{ "format": "driftproof-answers/2", "receipt_hash": "65231f29050580d7e14324c7aff5bfc053844d5c11093958713393e98283c26c", "model_id": "claude-sonnet-5-5", "answers": { "ac1a2521482dbc223d11dab606fb581f3b00b82ccdfa58abf8171e50766200d4": "Here's the workflow I'd follow. Nothing below has been run, since you asked for text only.\n\n**1. Check fit before anything else.** The local candidate has the right license and duration, but that doesn't tell us whether it sounds right. Before resolving fresh, the skill says to list reusable candidates with `--candidates` and judge fit myself. That means checking whether it actually reads as a short chime (tone, attack, decay, no trailing noise or clipping) and whether it suits the project's mood and the moment it will play on.\n\n**2. Decide based on that judgment.**\n- **If it fits:** reuse or adopt it. The point is to bring the existing file into the project's ledger so it's a frozen local file with a record, rather than leaving it as a loose file. Flags for ingest (`--from`) and adopt are documented in `references/resolve.md`.\n- **If it doesn't fit:** resolve a fresh one with `resolve --type sfx --intent \"short chime\" --project `. A chime is a sound effect, so `sfx` is the right type, not `bgm`. It searches the bundled 19-file library first and then the HeyGen catalog (which needs the `heygen` CLI). If the host app provides its own sound-effect tools, those take priority. If `HEYGEN_API_BASE` is set, the call goes through the host with no CLI sign-in.\n\n**3. Expect a compact result.** Resolve returns one line, `resolved → (, )`, and the search noise stays on disk.\n\n**4. Where the chime goes.** If it's meant for a transition or hard cut, that's the grounded signal for a transition SFX. I'd mention it in the single consolidated media-opportunity ask, not add it silently.\n\nThe main point is that a matching license and duration only make the candidate eligible. The fit check decides whether it gets reused.", "7729984c7a431e1e14e253120f9132c0d4bdd6c1278e4d58dd2a88115086009d": "The next step is to judge the local candidate's fit yourself, before resolving anything fresh.\n\n1. **Check fit.** License and duration are fine, but those are only two of the criteria. Fit is a judgment call: does the chime's timbre, brightness, and tail suit the moment it will punctuate and the project's overall sound? Check the candidate's metadata and description, and listen to it if you can. The skill's rule is to list reusable candidates (`resolve --candidates`) and decide on fit rather than assuming a match.\n\n2. **If it fits, reuse it.** Adopt the existing local asset through the reuse/adopt path instead of generating or downloading a duplicate. The exact flags are documented in `references/resolve.md`, which I haven't read in this session, so I won't guess at the syntax.\n\n3. **If it doesn't fit, resolve fresh.** Run `resolve --type sfx --intent \"\" --project `. This searches the bundled 19-file SFX library first, and the HeyGen catalog too if the `heygen` CLI is available. It returns one line (`resolved → ...`) and freezes the file locally with a ledger record. If the host app provides its own sound-effect tools, use those instead.\n\n4. **Don't mutate silently.** If you add the chime to the composition, tell the person which asset you chose and why, rather than slipping it in unannounced.\n\nI haven't run any of this, per your instructions. It's the workflow I'd follow once tools are allowed.", "0c5919fae870624bb732e0d3f4953ed199d41c0c8f32a44866a8c5070b240c1a": "Since a short chime is a sound effect, the type is `sfx`. The next step is to judge the local candidate's fit, not to resolve something fresh.\n\n**1. Check fit on the candidate.** License and duration already pass, but fit is the part I have to judge myself. That means checking whether the timbre and character suit the project's tone, whether the attack and tail are clean, and whether it works at the moment it will play (for example, a transition or a confirmation). Fit is a judgment call, so I wouldn't treat a passing license and duration as approval.\n\n**2. If it fits, reuse it.** I'd adopt the existing candidate instead of resolving a new one. That gets it into the project's ledger as a frozen local file, so it is recorded and reproducible. The exact reuse and adopt flags live in `references/resolve.md`, which I'd read before running anything.\n\n**3. If it doesn't fit, resolve fresh.** I'd run:\n\n```bash\nnpx hyperframes media-use resolve --type sfx --intent \"short soft chime\" --project \n```\n\nThe `sfx` type searches the bundled 19-file library first. It also searches the HeyGen catalog, but that part needs the `heygen` CLI unless the host sets `HEYGEN_API_BASE`. If the host app provides its own sound-effect tools, I'd use those instead.\n\n**4. Check the result and ask once, if it applies.** The output is a single `resolved → ` line. I'd confirm the file is in the composition at the intended timing. If the project has other gaps, such as no music bed or silent cuts, I'd raise them in one consolidated question, not one per asset.\n\nI haven't run anything, so nothing above has been checked against the actual candidate.", "fc482c9d4cfcb1c09b22e2b8a86323ecc51da21aaf108485b1b2722ea35119f9": "The candidate has cleared two gates (license and duration), but fit is unverified, so it is a shortlisted candidate and not yet the chosen asset. The next step is a fit check.\n\n**1. Define fit criteria** (if not already written down)\n- Tone: does it match the product's feel (friendly, neutral, urgent, premium)?\n- Purpose: confirmation, notification, or completion. Each wants a different character.\n- Technical qualities: no clipping, clean attack and tail with no abrupt cutoff, no noise or artifacts, and a sample rate and format the project supports.\n- Loudness: consistent with the other sounds in the project and not jarring at typical volume.\n- Repetition: if it will play often, it should not become grating.\n\n**2. Audition the candidate**\n- Listen to it in isolation, then in context (in the app or build, alongside other audio, on the likely playback devices such as speakers and headphones).\n- Check that it is distinguishable from other sounds and doesn't clash with them.\n\n**3. Decide**\n- **Pass:** adopt it. Record the source, license, and attribution requirements next to the asset. Make any needed edits (trim, normalize, fade, convert format), keeping the original untouched. Then integrate it.\n- **Fail or marginal:** reject it, note why, and look for another candidate. Check the license and duration first so you don't waste time auditioning unusable options. Light editing, such as a fade or a pitch or volume change, may rescue a marginal one if the license permits modification.\n\n**4. Record the outcome**\nWhichever way it goes, note the decision and rationale so the choice isn't repeated or lost.\n\nUntil step 2 is done, I wouldn't describe the chime as selected or ready for use, only as licensed and correctly sized.", "c898af27b1f9b69a3d180f0b916661a2a6d69bbe0944d5169bcc039e4a630c9c": "**Next asset workflow: verify the local candidate before adopting it**\n\nThe candidate already clears the two hard gates (license and duration), so the open question is purely whether it fits. Here's the sequence I'd follow:\n\n1. **Audition it in context.** Play the chime where it will actually be used (the real trigger, the real UI or scene, at realistic volume), not in isolation. Judge:\n - Tone: does it match the project's feel (bright, soft, playful, serious)?\n - Attack and tail: does it start cleanly and decay without clicks, abrupt cutoffs, or lingering noise?\n - Repetition: if it fires often, does it stay pleasant or become grating?\n - Layering: does it clash with other sounds, music, or notification tones?\n\n2. **Check technical fit.** Confirm format, sample rate, bit depth, channel count (mono vs. stereo), and loudness relative to other project audio. Note any normalization, trimming, or fade needed, and whether the file size is acceptable.\n\n3. **Decide.** Three outcomes:\n - **Accept as-is** if it passes.\n - **Accept with minor edits** (trim silence, normalize, add a short fade) and keep the original alongside the edited version.\n - **Reject** if the tone or behavior is wrong, then move on to the next candidate or source a new one, applying the same license and duration filters first.\n\n4. **Record provenance once accepted.** Log the source, author, license name and link, any attribution requirements, the original filename, and any edits made. Doing this at adoption time avoids having to reconstruct it later.\n\n5. **Integrate and verify.** Add the final asset to the project in the right location and naming convention, wire it up, and re-test it in the running project to confirm it behaves correctly.\n\nThe key point is that license and duration only make the candidate *eligible*. It shouldn't count as chosen until the fit check is done and the decision is recorded.", "56f20e9915634518afb30204900dbdb8f3c25a8af2adacec7ff2b2002b881130": "The candidate already passes the two gating checks, license and duration, so the next step is to check fit before it goes into the project.\n\n**1. Define fit criteria (briefly, before listening).**\nDecide what \"fits\" means for this chime: its purpose (notification, success, startup), the tone you want (bright, soft, neutral), and whether it should avoid sounding like a well-known branded sound. Writing the criteria first keeps the judgment from drifting to whatever the candidate happens to sound like.\n\n**2. Audition the candidate in context.**\nListen to it in the place it will be used, not in isolation. Check:\n- **Tone and mood:** does it match the product's character?\n- **Repetition:** is it still tolerable if it plays often?\n- **Mix:** does it clash with other UI sounds or music, and does it hold up at low volume and on small speakers?\n- **Technical quality:** no clipping, clicks, or abrupt tail cutoffs, and a clean start and end, since short sounds expose these.\n- **Format:** the sample rate, channels, and file type match what the project uses, or conversion is straightforward.\n\n**3. Decide.**\n- **Accept:** fit is good, so move on to integration.\n- **Accept with edits:** minor fixes such as trimming silence, normalizing loudness, or adding a fade-out. Keep the original file and note what was changed, since the license may govern modifications.\n- **Reject:** fit is poor, so search for another candidate and run the same license, duration, then fit checks.\n\n**4. Integrate and record (if accepted).**\n- Put the file where the project keeps its assets, with a clear name.\n- Record provenance next to it: source, author, license, and any edits made. Your license check is only useful later if it's written down.\n- Wire it in and verify it plays at the intended trigger point.\n\n**5. Re-check after integration.**\nListen once more in the running project, because fit problems often only show up once the chime plays alongside real UI behavior.\n\nOne caveat: since I haven't heard or inspected the file, I can't say whether it fits. Everything above is the process for finding out.", "75901616e95a2893f8483dcfc3f7dd8fc57f0cdc2a3ab858a7a752b483de6868": "The candidate has the right license and duration, but fit is unchecked, so the next step is to check fit before committing to it.\n\n**1. Define what \"fit\" means for this chime.**\nWrite down a few criteria for the project, such as the event it signals (success, notification, completion), the tone (bright, soft, playful, formal), and how it should sit with the rest of the audio. I don't have the project's specifics, so these are yours to set.\n\n**2. Audition the candidate in context.**\nListen to it in the place it will play, not in isolation. Check:\n- Whether the character matches the project's tone and the action it accompanies.\n- Whether it still works when repeated, since chimes tend to play often.\n- Whether the start and end are clean, with no clicks, abrupt cutoffs, or long tails.\n- Whether the loudness and frequency range fit alongside other sounds, on the speakers or devices your users are likely to have.\n- Whether the format and sample rate suit the project.\n\n**3. Decide.**\n- **Pass:** accept it and move to integration.\n- **Close but flawed:** if the license allows modification, consider small edits like trimming, fades, or level changes. Check the license terms before editing.\n- **Fail:** reject it and look for another candidate, applying the same license and duration filters first and the fit check second.\n\n**4. Integrate and record.**\nAdd the accepted file to the project's asset location and keep the license and source information alongside it, so the provenance is clear later. Note the fit decision too, in case someone asks why this chime was chosen.\n\n**5. Verify in the real build.**\nPlay it in the running project once it's wired in, since fit can differ from how it sounded in the audition.\n\nThe license and duration checks are already done, so the remaining work is the fit review, and that is the gate before the asset is adopted.", "8a98e524d031c88f8260ea0952622b0ef113b6ee4e9084dbc8ba8b700e11e957": "Here's the workflow from where you are now. The local candidate already clears the two hard constraints (license and duration), so the remaining question is purely whether it fits the project.\n\n**1. Audition the candidate in context**\nPlay it where it will actually be used, not in isolation. Check:\n- **Tone:** does it match the project's feel (bright, soft, playful, serious)?\n- **Timbre and pitch:** does it clash with other sounds or music playing nearby, or with the surrounding UI or scene?\n- **Attack and tail:** a chime should start cleanly and decay without clicks, abrupt cutoffs, or a long ring that overlaps repeated triggers.\n- **Loudness:** compare it against the other assets at the same output level, so it neither disappears nor jumps out.\n- **Repetition:** if it fires often, listen to several back-to-back plays to see if it grates.\n\n**2. Decide: accept, adjust, or reject**\n- **Accept** if it passes as-is.\n- **Adjust** if the issues are minor: trim silence, add a short fade, normalize the level, or tweak pitch. Keep the original untouched and work on a copy.\n- **Reject** if the problem is the character of the sound itself, then move to the next candidate or widen the search, applying the same license and duration filters.\n\n**3. Record provenance once it's accepted**\nEven though the license is already confirmed, write down the source, license name, any attribution requirement, and the date. Note any edits made. This keeps the asset auditable later.\n\n**4. Integrate and verify**\nAdd it to the project's asset location following existing naming and format conventions, wire it up, and test it in the real build, since playback behavior can differ from your audition setup.\n\n**5. Commit**\nCommit the asset together with its provenance note, so the license record travels with the file.\n\nOne caveat: I haven't heard the file or seen the project, so I can't say whether it fits. That judgment comes from step 1.", "6304d45e14eaba022f8d4a65b8e9b755c36bb7722d22fad724d8dc24327cc67a": "**Sourcing plan for the company logo (nothing run yet, just the plan)**\n\n1. **Confirm the company.** I need the exact company name (and ideally its domain) before resolving anything. Nothing has been supplied, so I won't guess.\n\n2. **Use the `logo` resolver, not a redraw.** The media-use `resolve --type logo` path pulls official brand marks through a fixed cascade:\n - theSVG (official SVG marks) first\n - then the company's GitHub avatar\n - then the site favicon as a last resort\n\n The result is frozen as a local file with a ledger record, so the composition references a stable asset.\n\n3. **Check reuse first.** Before resolving fresh, list existing candidates with `--candidates` and reuse a logo already in the project or ledger if it fits.\n\n4. **Prefer a user-supplied file if one appears.** If you can send the official logo (SVG or high-res PNG), ingest it with `--from` instead. That beats any fallback.\n\n5. **Be honest about fidelity.** If only the favicon or GitHub avatar is found, I'll say so. Those are low-resolution and may not be the real brand mark, so you can decide whether to accept them or provide the official file.\n\n6. **Verify before use.** I'd view the resolved file to confirm it's the right company and is clean (transparent background where expected), then place it in the composition.\n\n**What not to fabricate**\n\n- **No redrawn or \"recreated\" logos.** I won't hand-draw an SVG, approximate it with CSS or text, or have an image model generate a lookalike mark.\n- **No invented brand details:** no guessed colors, typefaces, wordmarks, or taglines presented as official.\n- **No fake provenance.** I won't claim a file is the official logo if it came from a favicon or avatar fallback, and I won't make up a source URL or license.\n- **No silent substitution.** If the cascade finds nothing reliable, I'll report that and ask for the file rather than slotting in a placeholder that looks like a real logo. If a placeholder is needed for layout, it will be visibly labeled as one (e.g., a neutral box reading \"LOGO\").\n\n**Practical note:** the resolve step needs the company name and a run of the CLI, which I haven't done per your instructions. When you're ready, give me the company name (or the file) and I'll proceed.", "e07be2768c5215a50b2a158716ea496ee59bd91e72efb63432429791b03cf66d": "I haven't run anything. This is the plan I'd follow once you approve it.\n\n## Sourcing plan\n\n1. **Get the exact company name, and ideally its domain or GitHub org.** You haven't given me either. The lookup needs one of them, and a wrong guess could pull in a different brand's mark.\n\n2. **Check for a reusable logo first.** Run `npx hyperframes media-use resolve --type logo --candidates --project ` to see whether this project's ledger already has one, and judge the fit myself before resolving fresh.\n\n3. **Resolve it with the logo cascade.**\n ```bash\n npx hyperframes media-use resolve --type logo --intent \" official logo\" --project \n ```\n The cascade tries, in order:\n - **theSVG**, the best case since it gives a vector brand mark.\n - **The company's GitHub avatar**, a raster fallback that is often the real brand mark but may be cropped or low-res.\n - **The site favicon**, the last resort. It is usually tiny and should be flagged as low quality if it's the one that lands.\n\n4. **Report which tier it came from.** The one-line result gives the path and metadata. I'd tell you whether it's a vector, avatar, or favicon, since that decides whether it's good enough for a hero shot or only a small corner bug.\n\n5. **If the result is weak or wrong, ask you for the official file.** The best fix is a brand-kit SVG or PNG, which I'd ingest with `--from`. A press-kit or brand-guidelines page from the company is the right place to get one.\n\n## What not to fabricate\n\n- **Don't redraw, trace, or approximate the logo** in SVG, CSS, canvas, or text. The skill states brand marks are never redrawn.\n- **Don't substitute a lookalike**, such as a styled wordmark in a similar font, initials in a circle, or a generic icon from `--type icon`, and present it as the company's logo.\n- **Don't recolor, stretch, crop, or add effects** to a resolved mark. If a variant is needed (light or dark background), it should come from the source or from you.\n- **Don't guess the company's identity, domain, or GitHub org.** If the cascade finds nothing confident, I'll say so rather than pick the closest match.\n- **Don't silently fall back to a placeholder.** If no real logo resolves, I'll say that and leave the slot visibly empty or ask you, rather than shipping a made-up one.\n\nSend me the company name (and domain or GitHub org if you have them) and I'll run the resolve.", "f633e2211f36bf9a66d4ef7fa97c56dba081d6a5572980cb40d745f16fb16057": "# Logo sourcing plan (nothing run, plan only)\n\n**Short version:** use the `logo` resolver to fetch the official mark, and never draw one myself.\n\n## Plan\n\n1. **Get the exact company name.** I also need the domain or GitHub org if there is one. Without these the lookup can match the wrong brand.\n2. **Check for an official file first.** If you have a brand kit, press page, or an SVG from the design team, that wins. It can be brought in with the resolver's ingest option (`--from`), and the ledger then records it as supplied.\n3. **Otherwise, resolve it.** The command would be:\n `npx hyperframes media-use resolve --type logo --intent \" official logo\" --project `\n The resolver tries these sources in order:\n - **theSVG**, which has official brand marks as vector files.\n - **The company's GitHub avatar**, if theSVG has no match.\n - **The site favicon**, as a last resort.\n4. **Check reuse before fetching.** I'd run `--candidates` to see whether the project or memory already holds this logo, and reuse it if it fits.\n5. **Report which source won.** A favicon or GitHub avatar is a low-resolution fallback, so I'd tell you plainly if that's what we got. You can then decide whether to supply a better file.\n6. **Verify placement.** Once the file is frozen locally, I'd check it in the composition at its real size for blur, cropping, and contrast against the background.\n\n## What not to fabricate\n\n- **Don't redraw, trace, or approximate the logo** in SVG, CSS, or canvas, even if it looks simple.\n- **Don't substitute a lookalike**, such as a wordmark typed in a similar font, a generated image, or an emoji.\n- **Don't invent brand details:** colors, proportions, or a tagline lockup. A recolored or distorted mark counts as fabrication too.\n- **Don't guess the source.** If the resolver misses, or only the favicon is available, I'll say so rather than pass it off as the official asset.\n- **Don't label something \"official\"** unless it came from theSVG, the company's own GitHub, or a file you supplied.\n\nIf no genuine source turns up, the honest options are a clearly marked placeholder or a file from you, and I'd ask which you prefer.", "1f0c8836582ac03d74ddda7b5aeda5fe389959161bbf9e866bbbdd50a76058d8": "**Sourcing plan (nothing run yet, just the plan)**\n\n1. **Use the `logo` resolver, not a redraw.** The skill's one verb for this is `npx hyperframes media-use resolve --type logo --intent \"\" --project `. It looks for an official mark in a fixed cascade: theSVG first, then the company's GitHub avatar, then its favicon. The result is a frozen local file plus a ledger record.\n\n2. **Check for reuse first.** Before resolving fresh, I'd list candidates with `--candidates` and judge whether an already-resolved logo in the ledger fits.\n\n3. **Ask for the company name and domain.** The resolver needs to know which brand is meant. If the name is ambiguous (several companies share it), I'd confirm the right one rather than guess.\n\n4. **Prefer a user-supplied file if one turns up.** If you later have an official logo (brand kit, press page, designer export), it can be ingested with `--from`, which beats any fallback source.\n\n5. **Judge fit of the result.** The cascade degrades in quality: a theSVG vector is best, a GitHub avatar is often a square crop, and a favicon is small and low-resolution. If only the favicon comes back, I'd tell you it's low-res and suggest you supply a proper file rather than upscaling it and presenting it as final.\n\n6. **Setup caveat.** Without `HEYGEN_API_BASE` set, the skill suggests verifying the environment with `resolve --doctor` first. I haven't run that, so I can't say whether the resolver is ready.\n\n**What not to fabricate**\n\n- **Don't draw, trace, or recreate the logo** in SVG, CSS, or text, and don't approximate it with a styled wordmark or initials in a brand-like font.\n- **Don't generate one with an image model** and pass it off as the company's mark.\n- **Don't invent brand details**: colors, typeface, proportions, taglines, or a domain/handle I haven't confirmed.\n- **Don't claim a match.** If the cascade finds nothing or a wrong-company result, I'd report that plainly instead of substituting something plausible.\n- **Don't silently use a placeholder.** If one is needed so layout work can continue, I'd label it clearly as a placeholder and flag it for replacement.\n- **Don't misreport provenance.** The ledger should show which source (theSVG, GitHub, favicon, or user-supplied) the file came from.\n\nIf the resolver can't find an official mark, the next step is for you to provide the file or point me to the company's official brand page.", "ce7cd9417830ba29d96468b6abd6ade967f2b5ad22c9838786ced7914ceb4c2d": "# Logo sourcing plan\n\n**Current state:** No official logo file has been supplied, and I don't have the company name, brand guidelines, or any asset location in the facts given. So there is nothing I can legitimately place in the project yet.\n\n## Sourcing plan\n\n1. **Ask the owner.** Identify who owns brand assets (marketing, design, founder, or the client's contact) and request the official logo directly.\n2. **Request the right formats.**\n - Vector: SVG (preferred), plus PDF or EPS as a master.\n - Raster fallbacks: PNG with transparency at 1x/2x/3x, and a favicon-size version (or a square mark).\n - Variants: full-color, one-color/mono, light-on-dark and dark-on-light, horizontal and stacked lockups, icon-only mark.\n3. **Request usage rules.** Brand guidelines or a press kit covering clear space, minimum size, approved colors, and any restrictions. Also confirm licensing/permission for the intended use.\n4. **Check official channels if the owner is slow.** The company's own press/media page, brand portal, or a design-system repo. Only use assets the company itself publishes for that purpose.\n5. **Record provenance.** Once received, store it in a dedicated location (e.g. `assets/brand/`), and note the source, date, who supplied it, and version in a README or commit message.\n6. **Use a clearly marked placeholder in the meantime.** A neutral box labeled \"Logo placeholder\" with the intended dimensions, so layout work isn't blocked and nobody mistakes it for the real thing.\n\n## What not to fabricate\n\n- **Do not invent or draw a logo**, including a stylized wordmark made from the company name in a chosen font, and present it as the brand's logo.\n- **Do not guess at brand details**: colors, typeface, proportions, or iconography.\n- **Do not scrape or substitute** a logo from a search result, social profile, third-party site, or a similarly named company. It may be outdated, low quality, wrongly licensed, or belong to someone else.\n- **Do not recreate or \"clean up\"** a low-resolution copy by tracing or redrawing it.\n- **Do not assume permissions** or claim the asset is approved when it isn't.\n- **Do not invent provenance**, such as stating a file came from the brand team when it didn't.\n- **Do not alter** the official logo once received (recolor, stretch, crop, add effects) beyond what the guidelines allow.\n\n## Suggested message to the owner\n\n> We need the official company logo for the project. Could you send the SVG (and PNG fallbacks), light/dark variants, and any brand guidelines or usage restrictions? Until then we're using a labeled placeholder.\n\nIf you tell me the company name and where the assets might live, I can help plan the integration once the file is available.", "f7d4e9fe473abcc13dc398eb122547d9f9fa9994649580e9f0fe2fefd5f8a17b": "# Logo Sourcing Plan\n\n**Status:** No official logo file has been supplied, so the project has nothing authoritative to use yet. The plan is to get the real asset from its owner rather than make a stand-in.\n\n## Sourcing steps\n\n1. **Ask the owner.** Request the logo from whoever controls the brand: marketing, design, or the founder/company contact. Ask for:\n - Vector formats (SVG, plus PDF or EPS if available)\n - A high-resolution PNG with transparent background\n - Light-background and dark-background variants\n - Icon-only and full wordmark versions\n - Any brand guidelines (clear space, minimum size, color values, usage restrictions)\n2. **Check existing company-controlled sources.** Look in the brand/press kit, the company website's media page, shared design drives (Figma, Google Drive), or prior approved materials such as slide decks. Use only files the company published or provided as its own.\n3. **Confirm usage rights.** Get written confirmation (even an email) that the file may be used in this project and in what contexts.\n4. **Record provenance.** Note where the file came from, who supplied it, the date, and the version, ideally in the repo's README or an assets note.\n5. **Use a clearly marked placeholder in the meantime.** A plain, neutral box labeled \"Logo placeholder\" (or just the company name in text) keeps layouts working without implying a real logo exists.\n\n## What not to fabricate\n\n- **Do not invent a logo.** No generated mark, monogram, or stylized wordmark presented as the company's logo.\n- **Do not recreate or approximate it from memory or description.** Look-alikes risk misrepresenting the brand.\n- **Do not scrape or substitute a logo from a third-party source** (search results, social avatars, unrelated sites) without confirming it's the current official version and that rights allow use.\n- **Do not make up brand details:** colors, fonts, taglines, or usage rules. Leave these as open questions until the guidelines arrive.\n- **Do not invent a provenance.** Don't claim the placeholder is \"official\" or \"approved,\" and don't cite a source or approval that didn't happen.\n- **Do not hide the gap.** Flag the missing asset in the project notes or PR description so the placeholder gets replaced before release.\n\n## Open item\n\nThe one blocker is a contact who can supply the official file. Once you identify them, the request in step 1 can go out as-is.", "8448d979ca24bc68c697f3984fc08d6b400a58003a307c615de614a4c43a934f": "# Logo sourcing plan\n\n**Current state:** No official logo file has been supplied, and I haven't looked in the repo or anywhere else (per your instruction, no tools). So I can't say whether one already exists in the project.\n\n## Plan\n\n1. **Ask the owner first.** Request the official logo from whoever owns the brand: marketing, design, or the founder/company contact. Ask for vector formats (SVG, or PDF/AI/EPS) plus a PNG fallback.\n2. **Request the variants the project will need:**\n - Full-color, one-color, and reversed (for dark backgrounds)\n - Horizontal and stacked/icon-only lockups\n - A square version for favicons and app icons\n3. **Get usage rules.** Ask for the brand guidelines or a press/media kit covering clear space, minimum size, color values, and permitted modifications.\n4. **Check usage rights.** Confirm the project is allowed to use the logo, especially if it's public-facing or open source, since a logo is typically trademarked and not covered by the code license.\n5. **Use a clearly marked placeholder in the meantime.** A plain text wordmark or a neutral box labeled \"Logo placeholder\" in the layout, with a TODO noting the logo is pending from the owner.\n6. **Once received,** store it in one agreed location (e.g. an `assets/` or `brand/` directory), record its source and date, and reference it from there rather than copying variants around.\n\n## What not to fabricate\n\n- **The logo itself.** Don't draw, generate, or approximate one, including recreating it from memory or a description, or typesetting the company name in a font and presenting it as the logo.\n- **Brand details.** Don't guess colors, typefaces, taglines, or proportions, or invent hex codes.\n- **Provenance.** Don't claim a file is \"official\" or \"approved\" when it isn't, and don't pull an image from a website or search result and label it as the supplied asset.\n- **Permissions.** Don't assume or state that usage is licensed or cleared.\n- **Completion.** Don't mark the logo task as done while a placeholder is in use. Report it as pending.\n\n## What I need from you\n\nThe name of the company contact, or the logo file itself. Once I have it, I can help place it and wire it into the project.", "6e46b0a92f0d842e432edd009e4239af991d5f100da605874fed963367948c82": "Here is the workflow I'd follow. Nothing has been run, since you asked for text only.\n\n**1. Read the treatment guide first**\nI'd read `references/media-treatments.md` before touching anything. Broad feedback like \"too dark\" counts as media intent, so it goes through the treatment path, not a one-off hack.\n\n**2. Inspect the real media**\n- I'd look at the actual ``/`