{ "format": "driftproof-answers/2", "receipt_hash": "f4bce7c9f27d9cfc6add44c9eb1bd239d2d6c55d8131ff95a432eaa8458c47c6", "model_id": "claude-sonnet-5-5", "answers": { "7990e89f583081504e64931f959996517fcfc2ab3b4204019a0d67cbc938cd15": "Nothing has been run. This plan only uses what the skill stub states.\n\n**Step 1: Load the workflow guide (read-only).**\nThe stub says to do this before any other `agent-browser` command:\n```\nagent-browser skills get core\n```\nIf the guide's command syntax is unclear, follow up with `agent-browser skills get core --full` for the full command reference. `agent-browser skills list` shows what else the installed version offers.\n\n**Step 2: Read the guide for three things.**\n- How to open a URL or attach to an existing session.\n- How to take an accessibility-tree snapshot, which is the read-only way to inspect the page.\n- How element refs (the `@eN` form) are issued and how long they stay valid.\n\nI don't know the exact command names or flags yet, so I'm not guessing them here.\n\n**Step 3: Navigate to the checkout page and take a snapshot.**\nUse the commands from the guide. The snapshot only reads the page and changes nothing.\n\n**Step 4: Identify the Submit button from the snapshot output.**\n- Look for an entry with a button role whose accessible name matches \"Submit\". The checkout may label it differently, such as \"Place order\" or \"Pay now\", so check the name against what the page actually shows.\n- Take the ref exactly as the snapshot prints it. Don't construct one.\n- If several buttons match, use their position under the form's group or landmark to pick the right one.\n- If none match, re-snapshot after the page finishes loading, or check whether the form is inside an iframe or behind a scroll or step.\n\n**Step 5: Stop and report before any interaction.**\nReport the button's role, name, and ref from the snapshot. Do not click, fill, or submit anything. On a checkout form, a click could place a real order, so I would ask you first.\n\n**Optional:** if the guide supports screenshots, take one to confirm visually that the identified button is the one you mean.", "d00e85209756fc7588e0e1eec2107960b8c5b8ce668c8c772b23a182888fb69b": "Here is the plan. Nothing has been run, and I'm not guessing at element refs.\n\n**1. Load the workflow guide first.**\nThe skill stub says it is only a discovery stub and that the real usage content comes from the CLI. The next step is:\n\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core\n```\n\nUse `--full` if the command reference is needed. This is read-only and makes sure the instructions match the installed version. I'd also run `agent-browser skills list` if I need to see what else is available. A specialized skill like `dogfood` is only relevant if this becomes a broader QA pass.\n\n**2. Confirm the exact commands from that guide.**\nI'm not stating the syntax for opening a URL or taking a snapshot from memory, because the guide hasn't been read. I'll take those commands from its output.\n\n**3. Open the checkout page (read-only navigation).**\nI need the checkout URL from you, or a note on whether it sits behind a login. If it requires authentication, the guide's session or auth-vault section should say how to handle it before navigating.\n\n**4. Take an accessibility-tree snapshot.**\nThe CLI produces compact `@eN` refs from the snapshot. Those refs only exist after the snapshot runs, so I'll read them from its output.\n\n**5. Identify the Submit button from the snapshot.**\nI'll look for an element with a button role inside the form. I'll match on its accessible name, which may say \"Submit\", \"Place order\", \"Pay now\" or similar. If several buttons match, I'll distinguish them by their position in the tree and the surrounding form group. I'll also check whether it is disabled, which often means required fields are empty.\n\n**6. Optionally capture a screenshot** to visually confirm the button I identified.\n\n**What I will not do during inspection:** click the button, fill fields, or submit anything. On a checkout form that could place a real order or charge a payment method. If you want interaction later, I'd confirm with you first.\n\nSend me the URL and any login details, and I'll start with step 1.", "244e7a88f0b6eea6f35a2d11579fe5e6782821a0606e9ddf28242610e3ef58f0": "Here is the plan. I haven't run anything, and the only commands I can vouch for are the ones in the skill stub.\n\n**Step 1: Load the workflow guide (read-only)**\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core\n```\nUse `--full` if you want the whole command reference. The stub says the real usage instructions come from this command, so I'm not guessing at other command names or flags until I've read it. `agent-browser skills list` shows what else is available on the installed version.\n\n**Step 2: Confirm from the guide how to do three things**\n- Open or navigate to the checkout page URL (I need the URL from you).\n- Take an accessibility-tree snapshot of the page. The snapshot assigns the `@eN` element refs.\n- Optionally take a screenshot to check the layout visually.\n\n**Step 3: Inspect the form from the snapshot output**\n- Read the refs the snapshot returns. Don't assume any ref number ahead of time.\n- Look for an element with the role `button` and a name like \"Submit\", \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", or similar. Checkout pages often label it differently from \"Submit\".\n- If several buttons match (for example \"Apply coupon\" and \"Place order\"), pick the one inside the checkout form, using its position and the surrounding fields.\n- If nothing matches, the button may be below the fold, in an iframe (common for payment widgets), or rendered after the page finishes loading. The guide's troubleshooting section should cover scrolling, waiting, and re-snapshotting.\n\n**Step 4: Report back**\nI'll give you the button's actual ref and label as they appear in the snapshot, plus the other form fields I found.\n\n**Constraints for this workflow**\n- Stick to navigating, snapshotting, and screenshots. Don't click Submit, fill in fields, or enter payment details, since that could place a real order or charge a card.\n- If the checkout needs a login, tell me first. That changes the workflow, and the guide covers authentication.\n\nTo proceed, tell me the checkout URL and whether I can run the commands above.", "ddcb37208020c30f5b616559a0aa4029ebfe626fc20af4e5d33e908ff15f6bb1": "I haven't run anything, and I don't know the CLI's name or subcommands from the facts given, so the commands below are placeholders to fill in once the guide is loaded.\n\n**Next read-only steps**\n\n1. **Load the workflow guide first.** Use the CLI's own help or guide command (for example its `--help` output or a dedicated \"guide\" or \"workflow\" subcommand, whichever it provides). Until I've read it, I shouldn't assume how it names pages, snapshots, or element references.\n\n2. **Confirm the browser session state (read-only).** Use the CLI's status or list-tabs command to see whether a session is open and which tab holds the checkout page. If the page isn't open, ask you for the URL or have you open it, rather than navigating on my own.\n\n3. **Take a snapshot of the page.** Use the CLI's accessibility-tree or DOM snapshot command, scoped to the checkout form if it supports scoping. This only reads the page. It does not click, type, or submit anything.\n\n4. **Identify the Submit button from the snapshot output.** I'd look for:\n - an element with the button role, or an input of type submit, inside the form\n - label text such as \"Submit\", \"Place order\", \"Pay\", or \"Complete purchase\". The label may differ from \"Submit\".\n - whether it is disabled, and whether more than one candidate exists (for example \"Apply coupon\" or \"Back\")\n\n I'd use only the element reference the snapshot actually returns, never a guessed one.\n\n5. **Verify before any action.** If several candidates match, or none does, I'd report what the snapshot shows and ask you. A refreshed snapshot may be needed if the page changes, since references can go stale.\n\n6. **Stop at identification.** Clicking Submit on a checkout form could place an order or charge a payment method, so I won't do it without your explicit go-ahead.\n\nOnce you let me run tools, the first action would be step 1, loading the guide.", "5f10500f8f0ba40008ba62d985da79775132dc6cb12ae2032c09410e47e883a8": "I can't tell which CLI this is or what its commands are, so the plan below avoids made-up command names and element references. Nothing here has been run.\n\n**Step 1: Load the workflow guide first.**\nThe guide hasn't been loaded, so this comes before any browser action. Look for the CLI's own help or guide command (for example a `--help` flag or a \"guide\"/\"workflow\" subcommand, if it has one). The guide should tell you:\n- how to open or attach to a page\n- how to take a snapshot of the page and what the element references look like\n- whether refs are stable or change after each snapshot\n\n**Step 2: Confirm the browser session and target page.**\nUsing the commands from the guide, check which page or tab is active and that it's the checkout form. Use read-only calls only (list tabs, get URL, get title). Don't navigate, click, or fill anything yet.\n\n**Step 3: Take a snapshot of the page structure.**\nUse the guide's read-only snapshot or accessibility-tree command. Treat the output as the only source of element references.\n\n**Step 4: Find the Submit button in the snapshot.**\n- Look for an element with a button role whose accessible name is \"Submit\", or a close variant such as \"Place order\", \"Pay\", or \"Complete purchase\".\n- Check that it sits inside the checkout form's structure, not another form on the page such as a newsletter signup or search.\n- If several candidates match, list them with their names and surrounding context.\n- Note whether the button appears disabled, since that affects whether it can be used later.\n\n**Step 5: Verify before reporting.**\nIf the CLI has a read-only way to get an element's text, attributes, or visibility, use it on the candidate. Confirm that it's the right element and that the ref came from the current snapshot. If the page has changed, take a fresh snapshot.\n\n**Step 6: Report back.**\nGive the button's role, name, and ref as shown in the snapshot, plus any ambiguity. Stop there. Clicking or submitting a checkout form is outward-facing and may place an order or charge a payment, so I'd ask you before doing it.\n\nOnce you tell me the CLI name or paste its guide output, I can turn this into exact commands.", "fad9dbe76c50b93ee40de6f090c4d8b6872967c89ffa00dfc8e03f24fb986b0b": "# Plan: find the Submit button on the checkout form\n\nI don't know which browser CLI you have or its command syntax, and its workflow guide hasn't been loaded. So I'm not naming exact commands or element references. Everything below is read-only, and nothing here has been run.\n\n## Next steps\n\n1. **Load the CLI's workflow guide first.** Use its built-in help or guide command, or its documented guide file. That tells us the real command names, how it refers to elements, and whether it has a snapshot or inspect mode. Until then, any command I wrote would be a guess.\n\n2. **Confirm the target page.** Check that the browser session is already on the checkout page, using a read-only \"current URL / title\" query. If it isn't, ask you before navigating, since navigation changes state and may need your sign-off.\n\n3. **Take a read-only snapshot of the page.** Use whatever the guide describes: an accessibility tree, a DOM outline, or an element listing. Don't click, type, or focus anything.\n\n4. **Scope to the checkout form.** In the snapshot, find the form container, usually a `form` element or a region labeled something like \"Checkout\", \"Payment\", or \"Billing\". Ignore buttons in the header, cart summary, and promo-code box.\n\n5. **Identify the Submit button within that form.** The signals to look for, in rough order of reliability:\n - A `type=\"submit\"` button or input inside the form\n - An accessible name such as \"Submit\", \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", or \"Complete purchase\"\n - Its position as the last actionable control in the form\n \n The visible label may not say \"Submit\", so match on role and type, not text alone.\n\n6. **Check for ambiguity.** If several candidates match (for example \"Apply coupon\" and \"Place order\"), or the button is disabled or hidden, record that. A disabled button usually means required fields are unfilled. Report that, and don't fill them in to find out.\n\n7. **Report back** with:\n - The element reference exactly as the CLI shows it\n - Its role, accessible name, and enabled or disabled state\n - Any other candidates and why you ruled them out\n\n## Boundaries\n\nI'd stop before clicking the button, filling fields, or submitting anything. On a checkout page those actions could place an order or charge a card. Any of them would need your explicit go-ahead.\n\nIf you tell me the CLI's name, or paste its guide output, I can turn this into concrete commands.", "17011489fe12fa73aab6c284bb3cdce2ef83f1ccfdffecaf14cc78bd193514a6": "# Plan: find the Submit button on a checkout form (read-only)\n\nI don't know the CLI's name, its commands, or its element-reference format. The workflow guide hasn't been loaded, so I'm not going to guess any of them. Every step below is read-only, and I haven't run any of it.\n\n## Step 1: Load the workflow guide first\n- Have the CLI print its own workflow guide or help (its `--help` output or a guide/docs subcommand, whichever it provides).\n- From it, learn:\n - how to open or attach to a page,\n - how to take a snapshot of the page structure (an accessibility tree or DOM listing),\n - how element references are produced and how long they stay valid,\n - which commands only read and which ones act (click, fill, submit).\n\n## Step 2: Confirm the browser session and target page\n- Use the guide's read-only command to list or confirm the current tab and URL.\n- If the checkout page isn't open yet, navigating to it is the first state-changing step, so confirm the URL with you before doing it.\n\n## Step 3: Take a fresh snapshot of the page\n- Capture the page structure with the snapshot command.\n- Treat any element references in the output as valid only for that snapshot. Re-snapshot if the page changes.\n\n## Step 4: Narrow to the checkout form\n- In the snapshot, locate the form region (a `form` element or a landmark or heading like \"Checkout\" or \"Payment\").\n- Note the fields it contains so you know you're in the right form, in case the page has several (for example a newsletter or promo-code form).\n\n## Step 5: Identify the Submit button from the snapshot\nLook for, within that form:\n- a `button` or `input` with type submit,\n- an accessible name such as \"Place order\", \"Pay\", \"Submit\", or \"Complete purchase\" (the label may not literally say \"Submit\"),\n- its state (enabled or disabled) and whether it's visible.\n\nIf more than one candidate appears (for example \"Apply promo\" next to \"Place order\"), choose by role, type, and position in the form, and report the ambiguity instead of picking silently.\n\n## Step 6: Report back without acting\nGive you:\n- the reference exactly as the snapshot printed it,\n- its role, accessible name, and enabled/disabled state,\n- which form it belongs to.\n\nI would not click, fill, or submit anything. On a checkout page that could place a real order or charge a card, so I'd wait for your explicit go-ahead.\n\n## Open questions for you\n- What is the CLI called, and can I run its guide command?\n- What is the checkout page URL, and is the browser already open on it?", "6aae9679a8e2edb7b5b93cc472b699e4d1b27c33ff6aba124dd429a7058c01ce": "I'd consult two guides, in this order, and load both before running any `agent-browser` interaction command.\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get electron`** is the guide for Electron desktop apps. The stub lists it for apps like VS Code, Slack, Discord, and Figma. It should cover how to attach to an Electron app, which is the part that differs from ordinary web pages.\n2. **`agent-browser skills get core`** covers the general workflows, common patterns, and troubleshooting. I'd read it because the Electron guide likely builds on the same snapshot-and-ref interaction model. Adding `--full` would give me the complete command reference if I need it.\n\nI'd also run `agent-browser skills list` first to confirm both guides exist on the installed version. The CLI serves content matching its own version, so that is more reliable than the stub or my memory. I haven't read either guide in this conversation, so I can't yet say how attachment works. I won't assume specifics like flags or ports until I've read them.\n\n**Evidence I'd want before interacting:**\n\n- **Guide output.** The actual text of the Electron and core guides, so the connection method and commands come from the installed version.\n- **Which app.** The application's name, how it's launched on this Linux machine, and whether it's already running.\n- **Connection details.** Whatever the Electron guide requires to attach, such as whether the app exposes a debugging endpoint and on which port. I'd confirm that rather than guess.\n- **Successful attach.** Evidence that agent-browser is connected to the intended app and window, not a different Chromium instance or a different Electron window.\n- **A baseline snapshot.** An accessibility-tree snapshot of the current state, so I can see the real element refs (`@eN`) and the app's current screen before acting.\n- **Scope and authorization.** What you want to inspect, and whether the app is one you're allowed to automate. If it holds logged-in or sensitive data, I'd also want to know whether anything should be off-limits, such as sending messages or changing settings.\n\nOnce the app is attached and I have a snapshot, I'd start with read-only inspection (snapshots, screenshots, reading text). I'd only click, type, or submit after confirming the target and that the action is intended, especially for anything hard to reverse or visible to others.", "206d025d145ebcf229cdd941c5537f2de9decf97a5ee2ad58c2bdd69796d17dc": "**Guides I would consult**\n\n1. `agent-browser skills get core` first. The stub says to load this before running any `agent-browser` command. It covers the base workflow, snapshots, `@eN` refs, and troubleshooting.\n2. `agent-browser skills get electron` next, since the target is an Electron desktop app (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, and so on). It should explain how to attach to or launch the app.\n3. If the app is Slack, I would also load `agent-browser skills get slack`.\n4. `agent-browser skills list` would confirm what the installed version offers, in case the names differ.\n\nI have not run any of these, as you asked. I'm going only from the stub's description, so the specifics of attaching (flags, ports, launch method) have to come from the guide itself.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n\n- **Which app and how it runs.** I need the app's name, its install path or launch command, and whether it's already running. This decides whether I launch it with a debugging port or attach to an existing instance.\n- **A reachable CDP endpoint.** Agent-browser drives Chrome/Chromium over CDP, so I need to confirm the app exposes a remote debugging port and that the CLI can connect to it.\n- **The right window or target.** Electron apps often have several windows or webviews, so I'd list the available targets and pick the correct one, not assume the first.\n- **A fresh accessibility snapshot.** Refs are only valid for the page state they came from. I'd take a snapshot, check that the elements I want appear with sensible roles and names, and re-snapshot after any navigation or UI change.\n- **Scope and authorization.** I need to know you own or are permitted to automate this app and what I may do in it. Reading is lower risk than sending messages, changing settings, or deleting data, and I'd confirm before any outward-facing or hard-to-reverse action.\n- **Any data sensitivity.** If the app holds logged-in sessions or private content, I'd want to know what I can capture in screenshots or output.\n\nOnce the guides confirm the attach method and a snapshot shows the expected UI, I'd start with read-only inspection before clicking or typing anything.", "5c091887aa2a091ca084dd2a894e7f99cc6d3c2b319772aef93d0a8ec60e3e76": "I'd consult two guides, in this order, both served by the installed CLI (nothing run here, per your instruction):\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get core`**: the stub says to load this before running any `agent-browser` command. It covers the general workflow (snapshots, `@eN` refs, interaction patterns) and troubleshooting. I'd add `--full` if I needed the complete command reference.\n2. **`agent-browser skills get electron`**: the specialized guide for Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, and similar). It should cover how to attach to an Electron app rather than a regular web page.\n\nIf the target is Slack specifically, I'd also load `skills get slack`. I'd run `agent-browser skills list` first if I wasn't sure which guides the installed version offers, since the CLI serves content matching its version.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting:**\n\n- **Which app and how it's launched.** Its name, install path or launch command, and whether it's already running. Attaching to an existing instance versus launching a new one may differ.\n- **How the guide says to connect.** Whether the app must be started with a remote-debugging flag or port, and what the guide says to use. I wouldn't guess at flags.\n- **Confirmation that the CLI is installed and a connection works.** The CLI's version, and evidence that it reached the app (for example, a tab/target listing or a first snapshot).\n- **A snapshot of the current state.** Before clicking or typing, I'd take an accessibility-tree snapshot and work from the `@eN` refs it returns. That confirms I'm in the right window and that the elements I intend to act on exist.\n- **Which window or target.** Electron apps often have several windows or webviews, so I'd verify I'm attached to the intended one.\n- **Your authorization and scope.** That you own or are permitted to inspect this app, and what you want done: read-only inspection, or actions that change state. For anything outward-facing or hard to reverse, such as sending messages, I'd confirm with you first.\n\nOnce the guide and the snapshot agree with what you expect, I'd start with read-only steps and only then move to interaction.", "715ac3690a493f889a555363bc25febb83936bcad31ae1243750fdb2367f13cb": "**Guides I would consult**\n\n1. `agent-browser skills get core` first. The stub says to load this before running any `agent-browser` command. It covers the general workflow, snapshot/ref patterns, and troubleshooting, and it matches the installed version.\n2. `agent-browser skills get electron` next, since the target is an Electron desktop app. It is the specialized guide for apps like VS Code, Slack, Discord, and Figma. I would likely add `--full` if I need the complete command reference.\n3. `agent-browser skills list` if I'm unsure what else the installed version offers. If the app is Slack specifically, I'd also load the `slack` guide.\n\nI haven't run any of these, per your instructions. I'm only naming what I would load, and I can't say what the guides contain until I read them.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n\n- **Which app and how it's launched.** I need the app's name and executable path, and whether it is already running or I should start it. I also need to know whether I'm allowed to restart it, since attaching may require launching it with a debugging flag.\n- **How to attach.** The Electron guide should tell me how to connect over CDP, such as a remote debugging port. I'd confirm the port is actually listening before sending any commands.\n- **Which window or target.** Electron apps often have several windows or webviews, so I'd confirm I'm attached to the right one.\n- **Current UI state.** I'd take an accessibility snapshot and read the `@eN` refs from it, rather than guessing at elements. I'd re-snapshot after any navigation or UI change, since refs can go stale.\n- **Scope and authorization.** I'd confirm you own the app or are permitted to inspect it, and what you want from the inspection (reading state, screenshots, or actions that change things).\n- **Side effects.** For anything outward-facing or hard to reverse, such as sending messages, submitting forms, or deleting data, I'd ask you first rather than assume approval.\n\nIf you tell me the app name and how you normally launch it, I can go through the guides and attach.", "4c24e35d0ff92704d4ee85e740e68cab1c9916a131dbd90545aecf52e197162f": "I'd consult two guides, in this order. I haven't run anything, so this is the plan rather than a result.\n\n**Guides**\n1. `agent-browser skills get core`: the stub says to load this before any `agent-browser` command. It covers the basic workflow, snapshots and refs, and troubleshooting.\n2. `agent-browser skills get electron`: this covers the Electron-specific parts, such as launching or attaching to the app and picking the right window.\n\nI'd also run `agent-browser skills list` first to confirm that `electron` exists on the installed version. If you plan to use `--full`, I'd check that the command reference matches your version.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n- **Which app and how it runs:** the app's name, the path to its executable, and whether it's already running or I should launch it. This decides whether I attach to it or start it.\n- **A way to reach it:** the Electron guide should say how to connect, most likely over CDP with a remote debugging port. I need to confirm that port is open and the app is actually listening on it, rather than assuming.\n- **Which window or target:** Electron apps often have several windows, webviews, or background pages. I need the list of targets and confirmation that I'm attached to the intended one.\n- **A fresh snapshot:** an accessibility-tree snapshot of the current screen. The `@eN` refs come from it, so I won't click or type until I can see the element I mean. I'd re-snapshot after any navigation or UI change, since refs can go stale.\n- **Authorization and scope:** that you own the app or are permitted to inspect it, and what is off-limits. Apps like Slack, Discord, or Notion may hold real accounts and messages. Read-only inspection (snapshots, screenshots) comes before anything that sends, deletes, or changes data.\n- **Your goal:** what you want to learn, such as UI structure, a specific bug, or a data flow. That determines whether I only observe or actually interact.\n\nOnce the guides and a snapshot confirm the connection and target, I'd start with read-only steps and ask before any action that is hard to undo.", "f1eee202d9e5ffc443e884e7aa8f246c0789fc3f2ac1666c903beb5025829958": "I'd consult two guides, in this order, both served by the installed CLI so they match its version:\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get core`** first. The stub says to load this before running any `agent-browser` command. It covers the general workflow, common patterns, and troubleshooting, including how snapshots and `@eN` refs work. I'd add `--full` if I need the complete command reference.\n2. **`agent-browser skills get electron`** next. This is the specialized guide for desktop apps like VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, and Notion. It should cover how to attach to an Electron app, which a normal browser-page workflow doesn't.\n\nIf the app turns out to be Slack, I'd also read `skills get slack`. I might run `agent-browser skills list` to confirm which guides exist on the installed version.\n\n**Evidence I'd want before interacting:**\n\n- **Which app and how it's launched.** I need the app's name, its executable path, and whether I start it or it's already running. Electron apps usually need to expose a debugging (CDP) endpoint, and the electron guide should say exactly how.\n- **That the CDP connection works.** I'd confirm the app is reachable on the expected port or endpoint, and that I'm attached to the right app and not some other Chrome instance.\n- **Which window or target I'm on.** Electron apps often have multiple windows or webviews, so I'd check the target list and pick the correct one before acting.\n- **A fresh snapshot.** I'd take an accessibility-tree snapshot and confirm that the elements I care about appear with refs. Refs can go stale after the UI changes, so I'd re-snapshot after navigation or state changes.\n- **Authorization and side effects.** I need your confirmation that this is your app or one you're allowed to inspect. For apps like Slack, actions such as sending messages are outward-facing and hard to reverse, so I'd confirm those with you before doing them. Read-only inspection (snapshots, screenshots) comes first.\n- **Your goal.** Are you inspecting the UI, extracting data, or testing a flow? That determines whether I stay read-only or interact.\n\nI haven't run anything. This is based on the stub's description, and the actual guides may add requirements I'd need to follow.", "a438e407c965fa8253f0149e68dabd2c337ca032fd3896375ffc7d170bb6bf9a": "I'd consult two guides, in this order:\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get core`**: the stub says to load this before running any `agent-browser` command. It covers the general workflow (snapshots, `@eN` refs, troubleshooting).\n2. **`agent-browser skills get electron`**: the specialized guide for Electron desktop apps like VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, and Notion. I'd also run `agent-browser skills list` to confirm the installed version offers that guide, since the CLI serves content matching the installed version.\n\nI haven't read either guide, so I won't state their exact commands or flags. I'd take those from the guides themselves rather than from memory.\n\n**Evidence I'd want before interacting:**\n\n- **Target and authorization:** which app it is, and confirmation that you own it or are allowed to inspect it. This matters most if it's a third-party app or holds sensitive data like a Slack workspace.\n- **How the app is running or launched:** whether I start it or attach to an instance that's already open. The electron guide should say what connection mechanism the CLI expects (likely a CDP endpoint), and I'd confirm it's reachable rather than assume.\n- **The right window or tab:** Electron apps often have several windows or webviews, so I'd confirm which one my session is attached to before acting.\n- **A fresh accessibility snapshot:** I'd check that the elements I intend to touch appear with refs, and that the page state matches what you described. Refs can go stale after navigation or UI changes, so I'd re-snapshot after any change.\n- **Side effects of the intended action:** whether it's read-only (inspecting, screenshots) or outward-facing or hard to reverse (sending a message, deleting data, submitting a form). For the latter I'd confirm with you first.\n- **Session and credential state:** whether the app is already logged in, and whether I'd be touching real accounts rather than a test profile.\n\nOnce those are settled, I'd start with read-only steps (snapshot, screenshot) to confirm I'm looking at the right thing, then move on to interactions.", "2c8aa09276a001c8221d131b79f046fb1b968fac52a7e13182a8d32e05a82149": "I can't confirm the guide names without running the CLI, and you've ruled that out for now, so this is a plan rather than a verified answer.\n\n**Which guide I'd consult**\n\n1. I'd start with the CLI's own guide index. I'd look at `agent-browser --help` or a guides/docs subcommand to see what it lists, rather than guessing a name.\n2. If there is an Electron-specific guide, I'd read that first. It should cover how to attach to an Electron app, usually through its Chromium remote debugging port, rather than launching a normal browser.\n3. If there isn't one, I'd read the guides on connecting to an existing browser or CDP endpoint, then the core guide on snapshots and element references. An Electron app is a Chromium target, so those are the next best match.\n4. I'd also check any guide on sessions, tabs, or windows. Electron apps often have several windows or webviews, and I need to know how to select the right one.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n\n- **Guide contents:** the exact attach or connect syntax, and how the guide says to list and choose targets. I won't infer flags from memory.\n- **How the app is launched:** whether it was started with a remote debugging port (for example `--remote-debugging-port=`), and which port. If it wasn't, I'd need your permission to restart it that way, since that changes the running app.\n- **Authorization and scope:** confirmation that this is your app, or that you're authorized to inspect it, and whether it holds real user data or accounts.\n- **Reachable debug endpoint:** proof that the port is listening and bound to localhost only, and which targets (windows, webviews, service workers) it exposes.\n- **Target identity:** which window or page is the one you care about, based on its title and URL, so I don't act on the wrong one.\n- **Current state:** a snapshot or screenshot of the target before any click or input, so I know what's on screen and have a baseline.\n- **Side-effect risk:** whether the actions I plan (clicks, form input, navigation) could send data, delete things, or trigger irreversible behavior. If so, I'd confirm with you first.\n- **Read-only first:** I'd start with snapshots and inspection and only move to interaction once the above is established.\n\nIf you later allow me to run the CLI, the first step would be listing the guides and reading the Electron or connect one.", "2252afbce7ea7f9902c83004ced74fa44db8c7c402f9471c6bb4e3cf3bc341da": "I can't name the exact guide yet, because I haven't seen the list of guides your installed CLI serves. I'd start by asking the CLI itself, using its help or guide-listing command, and look for an Electron-specific guide. If there isn't one, I'd read the general guide covering connecting to an existing browser or CDP endpoint, since Electron apps are Chromium underneath. I'd read the guide from the installed CLI rather than rely on memory or online docs, so it matches your version's commands and flags.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n\n1. **Guide and version.** The CLI version, the list of available guides, and the text of the Electron or CDP-attach guide. This tells me the supported attach method and the command syntax.\n2. **Authorization and scope.** Confirmation that this is your app, or that you're authorized to inspect it, and what is off-limits. Examples are real accounts, production data, and actions with side effects like sending, deleting, or purchasing.\n3. **How the app launches.** The binary path, and whether it's already running. Attaching usually requires starting it with a remote debugging port (for example `--remote-debugging-port=`). If it's already running without one, I'd need your approval to restart it.\n4. **Display environment.** The platform is Linux with an unknown shell, so I need to know whether a display or virtual framebuffer is available for a GUI app.\n5. **Reachable debugging endpoint.** Evidence that the port is listening and exposes targets, and that it's bound to localhost only.\n6. **Target inventory.** The list of windows, pages, and webviews. Electron apps often have several, such as a main window, hidden windows, devtools, and webviews, and I need to be sure I'm attached to the right one.\n7. **Current state.** An initial read-only snapshot or screenshot of the target page. I'd identify elements from that rather than guess at selectors.\n\nOnly after that would I do read-only inspection first, and ask before any click, input, or navigation that could change state.", "2c5e90a3c33280887f5c57b136a4c708bcea050d5cee37d15362d99578163381": "I can't run anything here, so I don't know the exact guide names or the command that serves them. I'd rather not guess at either.\n\n**Which guide I'd consult**\n\n1. The CLI's own guide index. I'd list what it offers, using whatever help or guides subcommand it exposes.\n2. The Electron-specific guide, if the index has one. It should cover how agent-browser attaches to an Electron app, which is usually through a Chromium remote-debugging (CDP) port rather than launching a fresh browser.\n3. The core or general usage guide for snapshots, element references, and interaction commands. Those apply once I'm attached.\n4. A guide on sessions, targets, or tabs, if one exists, since Electron apps often have several windows or webviews.\n\nI'd read the guide before running anything, because its instructions override my assumptions about flags and workflow.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n\n- **Authorization and scope:** that the app is yours or you're cleared to inspect it, and whether this is a dev build, a production build, or an app holding real data or accounts.\n- **How the app starts:** its executable path and version, and whether it can be launched with a remote-debugging port, or is already running with one.\n- **Connection details:** that the debugging port is actually listening, which host and port it's on, and that it's bound to localhost only.\n- **Targets:** which windows, webviews, and background pages exist, and which one I should attach to. I'd confirm this from the target list, not assume it.\n- **Current state:** what the app is showing (logged in or out, which screen), confirmed from a read-only snapshot or screenshot first.\n- **Side effects:** whether the controls I might click are destructive or outward-facing, such as sending, deleting, purchasing, or syncing. I'd ask you before touching any of those.\n- **Platform constraints:** whether this Linux environment has a display, or needs a headless or virtual one, for the app to render.\n\nWith that in hand, I'd start with read-only steps (attach, list targets, snapshot) and only then move on to clicks or input.", "9db22d03632519dfb0c06fe3a580740ed9e32eba0deda24898ac6206ab366017": "I haven't run anything, so this is a plan rather than a verified procedure.\n\n**Which guide I'd consult**\n\nThe only fact I have is that the installed CLI can serve its own guides. I don't know the exact guide names or the command syntax, so I won't guess them. I'd first ask the CLI to list its available guides, using its own help output to find the command. Then I'd read:\n\n1. An Electron-specific guide, if one exists. This is the primary one, since it would cover how to attach to or launch an Electron app.\n2. Otherwise, the core or general usage guide, plus any guide on connecting to an existing browser or debugging endpoint. Electron is Chromium-based, so attaching through a remote debugging port is the likely route, but I'd confirm that against the guide.\n\nI'd read the guide from the installed CLI rather than rely on memory, because the installed version is the one that determines which commands and flags actually exist.\n\n**Evidence I need before interacting**\n\n- **Authorization and scope:** The app is yours, or you're permitted to inspect it, and you know what you want to learn from it.\n- **App identity:** The executable path, the Electron version if known, and whether it's packaged or run from source.\n- **Launch state:** Whether it's already running or I need to start it. If I need to start it, I need to know if I'm allowed to restart it, and whether it can be started with a remote debugging port enabled. Some packaged apps disable that.\n- **Connection details:** The debugging port or endpoint, and confirmation that it's bound to localhost only.\n- **Environment:** This is Linux, so I need to know whether a display is available or whether a virtual one is required.\n- **Target selection:** Electron apps often have several windows, webviews, or devtools targets. I need to confirm that the CLI is attached to the intended one, for example by checking its title and URL.\n- **Side-effect risk:** Whether the app holds real data or a logged-in session, and which actions would be destructive or outward-facing, such as sending, deleting, or purchasing. I'd stay read-only until you say otherwise.\n- **Baseline observation:** A first snapshot of the page structure, taken before any click or typing. I'd use it to confirm the target is correct and to choose element references from what's actually there.\n\nOnce those are settled, I'd begin with read-only inspection and ask you before any action that changes state.", "6d76db35203596fba31ae8bc35b491a9a32d79702736eefcbb798f7370cb3af9": "I can't confirm the exact guide names from what you've given me, and I won't guess them. Here is what I'd do once I'm allowed to run commands.\n\n**Which guide**\n\n1. I'd ask the installed CLI to list its guides, probably through its help output or a guides/docs subcommand. Reading the installed CLI's own guides matters because they match its version, whereas docs I remember may not.\n2. I'd read the guide for Electron or desktop apps first. That is the one most likely to cover connecting to an app over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) instead of launching a fresh browser.\n3. I'd then read the core or general usage guide for the snapshot, element reference, and interaction commands. It would also cover sessions and cleanup if it includes them.\n4. If no Electron guide exists, I'd say so and fall back to the CDP-connection section of the general guide.\n\n**Evidence I'd want before interacting**\n\n- **Authorization and scope:** that the app is yours or you're cleared to test it, and whether it holds real data or accounts where a stray click could cause harm.\n- **Launch method:** whether the app can be started with a remote debugging port, such as `--remote-debugging-port=`, or is already running with one. Many packaged apps disable this, and I'd need to know that early.\n- **Connectivity:** that the CDP endpoint responds and that the port is bound to localhost only.\n- **Targets:** how many windows, webviews, or pages the app exposes, and which one is the main UI. Electron apps often have hidden or helper windows, and I want to avoid acting on the wrong one.\n- **Version fit:** the CLI version and the Electron/Chromium version, to confirm the guide's commands apply.\n- **Initial state:** a snapshot of the target showing the accessibility tree and element references, so I act on elements I can see and not on assumptions.\n- **Reversibility:** which actions are destructive or outward-facing, such as sending, deleting, or purchasing. I'd confirm with you before doing any of them.\n- **Cleanup:** how to disconnect without closing or altering your app.\n\nUntil I've seen the guide output and a snapshot, I would only observe and not click or type.", "102b240f82b41bc4188dd1b3744ab244d146e1b10cce8001502bda544f5bfd94": "The operator should stay on the dashboard's forwarded origin (for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost`, or whatever proxied or forwarded URL fronts port 4848), not the internal session port the tab links seem to point at.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The dashboard proxies everything internally.** Session tabs, status, and stream traffic all go through the dashboard origin. The session port is an implementation detail behind that proxy, so it doesn't need to be exposed or visited directly.\n- **The session port is likely unreachable from the operator's side.** In a forwarded or proxied setup, only the dashboard origin is exposed. A link that points at an internal port will probably fail to load, time out, or hit a different service on the operator's own machine.\n- **Switching origins can break the session view.** Navigating to a different origin means the proxied status and stream endpoints may no longer resolve. It can also introduce cross-origin or mixed-content problems.\n- **The dashboard runs independently of browser sessions.** It stays up on 4848 whether or not a given session is running, so the operator doesn't need to reach the session port for the dashboard to work.\n\nIf a tab link looks like it points at an internal port, treat that as how the link is displayed rather than where the operator should go. They should keep using the dashboard origin and open the session tab from there.", "affcabdf3a7ba7a9f14c809b44e5443f675a889b35663514fe4babfce6f0b1e0": "The operator should stay on the dashboard's forwarded origin, for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost` or whatever proxied or forwarded URL they used to reach it (the dashboard itself listens on port 4848).\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The dashboard proxies session traffic internally.** Session tabs, status, and stream traffic all go through the dashboard origin. The operator never needs to reach a session's own port directly.\n- **The internal port links are only an appearance.** Tab links that seem to point at an internal session port reflect where the session runs on the host. In a forwarded setup that port usually isn't exposed or routable from the operator's machine, so following it would likely fail or hit the wrong thing.\n- **Staying on one origin keeps things consistent.** A single origin avoids cross-origin problems, such as blocked requests or broken streams, and avoids needing extra port forwards or opening additional ports.\n\n**In practice:** If a tab link looks like it targets an internal session port, don't open it directly. Use the tab through the dashboard UI on the forwarded origin and let the dashboard route the request to the session.", "88b044cbe0527f8a61ec735b708900f4714f8c36a458cc3f2e8088dd7edf7a2e": "The operator should stay on the dashboard's forwarded origin, for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost` or whatever proxied or forwarded URL they used to reach it, and not follow the tab links to the internal session port.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The dashboard proxies session traffic internally.** Session tabs, status, and stream traffic all go through the dashboard origin (port 4848 behind the forward). Nothing requires the operator to reach a session port directly.\n- **The session port is likely unreachable from outside.** It is an internal address. Through a forwarded or proxied setup, a link pointing at it would typically fail to load, or would resolve to the operator's own machine instead of the host running the browser.\n- **Exposing the port is unnecessary.** Since the dashboard handles the proxying, there's no reason to open or forward extra session ports, which would widen the exposed surface for no benefit.\n- **Mixing origins can break things.** Leaving the dashboard origin can cause cross-origin and mixed-content problems, and can drop the proxied stream connection.\n\nIf a tab link appears to point at the internal port, treat it as a display artifact of how the link was generated. The operator should keep using the dashboard origin and open the session from within the dashboard UI.", "dad3e78b4f04b1754f9d8478d03104ccdd051880a57a5e1701088ade14e23d4c": "The operator should stay on the forwarded origin, the address the dashboard was opened through, and not follow the session tab links to the internal session port.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The internal port is only reachable from inside the host.** Links that point at it (for example `localhost:` or an internal hostname) resolve on the operator's own machine, not on the machine running the dashboard. They will either fail to connect or, worse, hit an unrelated local service that happens to use that port.\n- **The forwarding layer is what makes the dashboard reachable.** The forwarded origin is the path that has been set up, and likely authenticated, to carry traffic to the dashboard. Going around it bypasses that setup, along with any access control, TLS termination, or routing it provides.\n- **Origin changes break browser state.** Cookies, local storage, and CORS or CSRF checks are tied to the origin. Moving to a different host or port means the session may appear logged out, requests may be rejected, and WebSocket or event-stream connections may fail on origin mismatch.\n- **The links are likely a symptom of the app not knowing its public address.** The dashboard probably builds URLs from its own bind address instead of the forwarded host and port. That is a configuration issue (a base URL or proxy-header setting), not a sign that the internal address is the correct one to use.\n\n**What to do in practice:** keep working from the forwarded origin. If a session tab link points at the internal port, don't click it as-is. Instead, take its path and query and open them under the forwarded origin, or forward that session port as well and use its forwarded address. A durable fix is to configure the dashboard with its external base URL, or have the proxy pass the original host and protocol headers, so the generated links point at the forwarded origin.", "d18df5364184ece516f912c21c98d77ba0dc14501e3d3587942d3339ecc3a993": "The operator should stay on the forwarded origin, the address the dashboard was loaded from, and not follow the session tab links to the internal session port.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **Reachability:** The internal session port is the address the dashboard sees from inside its own host or network. From the operator's browser it is likely unreachable, or it points at the operator's own machine, so the tab would fail or show the wrong thing.\n- **Forwarding and access controls:** The forwarded origin is the path that has been deliberately exposed. Going straight to an internal port bypasses whatever authentication, TLS, or access policy sits in front of it, and it shouldn't be exposed directly.\n- **Origin change:** A different host or port is a different origin. Cookies, session state, CORS rules, and WebSocket connections tied to the forwarded origin won't carry over, so the session may appear broken or logged out even if it is running.\n- **Likely cause:** The links \"appear to\" point at the internal port because the dashboard builds URLs from its own internal host and port rather than the public forwarded one. This is typically a base-URL or proxy-header setting, such as `X-Forwarded-Host` or `X-Forwarded-Port`, not being honored. It is a link-generation quirk and doesn't mean the internal port is the right destination.\n\n**What to do:** Open the session through the forwarded origin by keeping that host and port and using the same path the link would have used. If the dashboard has a public base URL or proxy-trust setting, configure it so the links come out correct. I haven't verified any of this, since I only have the facts you supplied.", "a6b86fbdf0ad1a5a9ed0d44ee73b55e39eda3545eec6277e6a9486e8725f8bd3": "Stay on the forwarded origin, the address you used to reach the dashboard, and don't follow the session tab links to the internal session port.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The internal port is probably unreachable from your browser.** It's likely bound to localhost or a private network inside the host or container. Only the forwarding layer (port forward, reverse proxy, or tunnel) makes the dashboard reachable from outside. A link to the internal port will usually time out, be refused, or resolve to your own machine's localhost, where nothing is listening.\n- **The forwarded origin carries the access path.** Authentication, TLS, and any proxy rules apply there. Going directly to the internal port bypasses them, or fails because the session depends on them. Cookies and CORS or same-origin checks are tied to the origin, so switching origins can also lose your login or break the page's API calls.\n- **The links are probably just wrong.** The dashboard likely builds those URLs from its own view of where it's running (internal host and port) rather than the public forwarded address. That is a display or config issue, not a sign you should change addresses.\n\n**What to do:**\n\n1. Keep working on the forwarded origin.\n2. If a session tab link is wrong, copy its path (everything after the host and port) and append it to the forwarded origin by hand.\n3. For a lasting fix, configure the dashboard's external or base URL setting so it generates links with the forwarded origin. If it's behind a proxy, make sure the proxy passes the forwarded host and protocol headers (`X-Forwarded-Host`, `X-Forwarded-Proto`).\n\nI haven't seen the actual addresses, so this follows from the setup you described. If the forwarded origin itself fails when you use the rewritten path, that points to a forwarding or proxy problem instead." }, "draws": [ { "id": "web", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 0, "generation_hash": "7990e89f583081504e64931f959996517fcfc2ab3b4204019a0d67cbc938cd15", "answer_sha256": "7990e89f583081504e64931f959996517fcfc2ab3b4204019a0d67cbc938cd15", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it loads the core guide first via `agent-browser skills get core`. Criterion 2 met: it takes a snapshot before choosing elements. Criterion 3 met: it says not to construct refs. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing has been run and that no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it loads the core guide first via 'agent-browser skills get core'. Criterion 2 met: it takes a snapshot before choosing elements. Criterion 3 met: it says refs must be taken as printed, not constructed. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing has been run and explicitly does not click or submit.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: Step 1 loads the core guide first via `agent-browser skills get core`. Criterion 2 met: Step 3 takes a snapshot before Step 4 selects elements. Criterion 3 met: Step 4 says take the ref exactly as printed and not to construct one. Criterion 4 met: Step 5 explicitly says nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core guide first (Step 1), takes a snapshot before identifying the button (Steps 3-4), refuses to construct refs, and states nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it directs loading the core guide via `agent-browser skills get core` first. Criterion 2 met: it takes a snapshot and identifies the button from its output. Criterion 3 met: it says not to construct refs and invents none. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing has been run and no click or submission occurred.\"}" ] }, { "id": "web", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 1, "generation_hash": "d00e85209756fc7588e0e1eec2107960b8c5b8ce668c8c772b23a182888fb69b", "answer_sha256": "d00e85209756fc7588e0e1eec2107960b8c5b8ce668c8c772b23a182888fb69b", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: it loads the core guide first, takes a snapshot before choosing elements, invents no refs, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core guide first (step 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements (step 4), invents no element refs, and states that no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core guide first (step 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements (step 4 before 5), invents no element refs, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core guide first, takes a snapshot before choosing elements, invents no refs, and explicitly states nothing was run or clicked, meeting all four rubric points.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it directs loading the core workflow guide first. Criterion 2 met: it plans a snapshot before choosing elements and says refs come from that output. Criterion 3 met: no element reference is invented. Criterion 4 met: it explicitly says nothing has been clicked or submitted.\"}" ] }, { "id": "web", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 2, "generation_hash": "244e7a88f0b6eea6f35a2d11579fe5e6782821a0606e9ddf28242610e3ef58f0", "answer_sha256": "244e7a88f0b6eea6f35a2d11579fe5e6782821a0606e9ddf28242610e3ef58f0", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it loads the core guide first via 'agent-browser skills get core'. Criterion 2 met: it says the snapshot is needed before choosing refs. Criterion 3 met: it explicitly refuses to assume ref numbers. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing was run and no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the core guide before any action, Step 3 reads refs from a fresh snapshot without assuming numbers, and it claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core workflow guide first (criterion 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements and reads refs from it (criterion 2), invents no refs (criterion 3), and states nothing was run or clicked (criterion 4).\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core guide first (Step 1), takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, invents no refs ('Don't assume any ref number'), and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (loads core workflow guide first), 2 (fresh snapshot before choosing elements), and 4 (explicitly does not click Submit); criterion 3 is satisfied too, since it avoids inventing refs, so this should be 1.0 with the rubric's binary 0.25 scoring.\"}" ] }, { "id": "web", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 0, "generation_hash": "ddcb37208020c30f5b616559a0aa4029ebfe626fc20af4e5d33e908ff15f6bb1", "answer_sha256": "ddcb37208020c30f5b616559a0aa4029ebfe626fc20af4e5d33e908ff15f6bb1", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the workflow guide first (step 1), takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements (steps 3-4), uses only snapshot-returned references, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met all four criteria: it says to load the workflow guide first, takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, uses only snapshot-returned references, and states no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the workflow guide first, takes a snapshot before identifying the Submit button, uses only snapshot-returned references, and explicitly claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the workflow guide first (step 1), takes a fresh snapshot before identifying elements (steps 3-4), uses only snapshot-returned references, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: loads the workflow guide first, takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, uses only snapshot-returned references, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}" ] }, { "id": "web", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 1, "generation_hash": "5f10500f8f0ba40008ba62d985da79775132dc6cb12ae2032c09410e47e883a8", "answer_sha256": "5f10500f8f0ba40008ba62d985da79775132dc6cb12ae2032c09410e47e883a8", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the workflow guide before any browser action, Step 3 takes a snapshot before Step 4 selects the button, no element refs are invented, and the response states nothing was run or clicked.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the workflow guide first (Step 1), takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements (Steps 3-5), invents no element refs, and states nothing was run or clicked.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the workflow guide first (Step 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements (Steps 3-4), invents no refs, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"The response requires loading the workflow guide first, takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, invents no element refs, and states that nothing has been run or clicked.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met all four criteria: it loads the workflow guide first, takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, invents no element refs, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}" ] }, { "id": "web", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 2, "generation_hash": "fad9dbe76c50b93ee40de6f090c4d8b6872967c89ffa00dfc8e03f24fb986b0b", "answer_sha256": "fad9dbe76c50b93ee40de6f090c4d8b6872967c89ffa00dfc8e03f24fb986b0b", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met all four rubric points: step 1 loads the CLI workflow guide first, step 3 takes a read-only snapshot before choosing elements, no element reference is invented, and it explicitly states nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response loads/requests the CLI workflow guide first, plans a read-only snapshot before choosing elements, invents no element references, and explicitly states nothing was run or clicked.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met: it explicitly asks to load the CLI's workflow guide first. Criterion 2 is met: it calls for a read-only snapshot before choosing elements. Criterion 3 is met: it names no element references. Criterion 4 is met: it states nothing was run and no click or submission occurred. That is four criteria, but the rubric's wording on criterion 2 and 4 only partially matches, so the score is set to 0.5, leaving the response not passing.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met all four criteria: it requires loading the CLI workflow guide first, takes a read-only snapshot before choosing elements, invents no element references, and explicitly claims nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the CLI workflow guide first (step 1), takes a read-only snapshot before identifying the button (steps 3, 5), invents no element references, and states nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}" ] }, { "id": "web", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 3, "generation_hash": "17011489fe12fa73aab6c284bb3cdce2ef83f1ccfdffecaf14cc78bd193514a6", "answer_sha256": "17011489fe12fa73aab6c284bb3cdce2ef83f1ccfdffecaf14cc78bd193514a6", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: it loads the CLI's workflow guide first, takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, invents no element references, and states that no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the workflow guide first, Step 3 takes a fresh snapshot before Step 5 selects elements, no element reference is invented, and it states nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1: Step 1 loads the CLI's workflow guide first. Criterion 2: Step 3 takes a fresh snapshot before element selection. Criterion 3: no element references are invented. Criterion 4: it explicitly states nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the CLI workflow guide first (Step 1), takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements (Step 3), invents no element references, and explicitly states no click or submission occurred.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 has the model load the CLI's workflow guide first, Step 3 requires a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, it invents no element references, and it explicitly states nothing was clicked or submitted.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 0, "generation_hash": "6aae9679a8e2edb7b5b93cc472b699e4d1b27c33ff6aba124dd429a7058c01ce", "answer_sha256": "6aae9679a8e2edb7b5b93cc472b699e4d1b27c33ff6aba124dd429a7058c01ce", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\n \"score\": 0.75,\n \"pass\": true,\n \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes verifying the intended app/window connection, and requires a baseline snapshot before acting. Item 4 is only implicit: it never explicitly warns against reusing web page refs.\"\n}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide and asks for a baseline snapshot before acting, and avoids blind web-ref reuse, but describes only verifying the attach rather than the connection method.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, requires a baseline snapshot before acting, and refuses to reuse web refs blindly; connection method is deferred to the guide, so criterion 2 is only partly described.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and requires a baseline snapshot and scope check before actions, and avoids assuming refs; the connection criterion is only partly met because it defers the attach method to the guide.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (criterion 1) and requires a baseline snapshot and read-only inspection before acting (criterion 3). Connection verification is described but not how to attach (partial criterion 2), and the no-blind-web-ref point is only implied (partial criterion 4).\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 1, "generation_hash": "206d025d145ebcf229cdd941c5537f2de9decf97a5ee2ad58c2bdd69796d17dc", "answer_sha256": "206d025d145ebcf229cdd941c5537f2de9decf97a5ee2ad58c2bdd69796d17dc", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide via `agent-browser skills get electron`, describes attaching via debugging port/CDP and target selection, requires a fresh snapshot and app state before actions, and re-snapshots rather than reusing refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP port attach or launch, asks for app state and targets before acting, and warns against reusing refs across page states.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (criterion 1), describes attaching via CDP and target selection (criterion 2), requires app state and a fresh snapshot before actions (criterion 3), and warns that refs are page-state specific and must be re-snapshotted (criterion 4).\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attach/launch and target selection, requires app state and a fresh snapshot before acting, and refuses to reuse stale refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, explains CDP port attach or launch, asks for app state and a fresh snapshot, and warns refs are page-specific; all four criteria met.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 2, "generation_hash": "5c091887aa2a091ca084dd2a894e7f99cc6d3c2b319772aef93d0a8ec60e3e76", "answer_sha256": "5c091887aa2a091ca084dd2a894e7f99cc6d3c2b319772aef93d0a8ec60e3e76", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes attaching to the existing app and verifying the target window, requires a snapshot and evidence before acting, and notes Electron differs from a regular web page.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (criterion 1), describes attach-vs-launch and flag checks before connecting (2), requires a snapshot and window verification before acting (3), and treats Electron as distinct from a web page (4), though that last point is implicit.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide and describes attaching to the app, confirming the connection, and taking a fresh snapshot before acting. It never explicitly warns against reusing web-page refs, though it implies this by contrasting Electron with web pages.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, covers attaching to the app and verifying the target window, asks for app state and a snapshot before acting, and contrasts Electron with a regular web page.\"}", "{\n \"score\": 1.0,\n \"pass\": true,\n \"reason\": \"Routes to `skills get electron`, describes attaching to the Electron app rather than a web page, requires a fresh snapshot and window verification before acting, and avoids guessing flags. Criterion 4 is met only implicitly.\"\n}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 3, "generation_hash": "715ac3690a493f889a555363bc25febb83936bcad31ae1243750fdb2367f13cb", "answer_sha256": "715ac3690a493f889a555363bc25febb83936bcad31ae1243750fdb2367f13cb", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP/remote-debugging attachment with port verification, requires snapshotting UI state before acting, and re-snapshots instead of reusing stale refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attachment and port verification, requires state inspection via fresh snapshot before acting, and warns that refs can go stale and must be re-read rather than reused.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attachment and confirming the port, asks for app and UI state before acting, and requires fresh snapshots rather than reusing stale refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to `agent-browser skills get electron`, describes CDP/debug-port attachment and target confirmation, asks for app state before acting, and requires fresh snapshots rather than reusing stale refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP port attachment and verification, asks for app state and snapshots before acting, and re-snapshots instead of reusing stale @eN refs.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 4, "generation_hash": "4c24e35d0ff92704d4ee85e740e68cab1c9916a131dbd90545aecf52e197162f", "answer_sha256": "4c24e35d0ff92704d4ee85e740e68cab1c9916a131dbd90545aecf52e197162f", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes connecting via CDP/port and target selection, and requires a fresh snapshot before acting; it does not explicitly warn against reusing web page refs, so criterion 4 is only loosely met (refs may go stale) and it earns partial credit as not fully satisfied.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to `agent-browser skills get electron`, describes confirming the CDP port and attaching to the intended target, asks for app state and a fresh snapshot before acting, and avoids reusing stale refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP connection and target confirmation, requires a fresh snapshot and read-only steps before actions, and avoids blind ref reuse by re-snapshotting after UI changes.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (criterion 1), describes connecting via CDP with a debugging port and confirming the target (2), requires app state and a fresh snapshot before acting (3), and warns that refs go stale and must be re-snapshotted (4).\"}", "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide and asks for app state and a fresh snapshot before acting, but does not satisfy criterion 4 (don't reuse web refs blindly) and is weak on establishing the connection (missing criterion 2 specifics beyond a CDP mention).\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 5, "generation_hash": "f1eee202d9e5ffc443e884e7aa8f246c0789fc3f2ac1666c903beb5025829958", "answer_sha256": "f1eee202d9e5ffc443e884e7aa8f246c0789fc3f2ac1666c903beb5025829958", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attachment and confirming the right target, requires a fresh snapshot and app-state checks before acting, and re-snapshots rather than reusing refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attachment and target verification, requires app state inspection and a fresh snapshot before acting, and warns that refs can go stale and need re-snapshotting.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attachment and target selection, asks for app state before acting, and warns that refs go stale so it re-snapshots rather than reusing them.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (criterion 1), describes establishing the CDP connection to the correct app and target (criterion 2), requires app state and a fresh snapshot before acting (criterion 3), and warns refs can go stale and re-snapshots rather than reusing refs (criterion 4).\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes CDP attachment and target selection, and requires a fresh snapshot before acting; it warns that refs go stale but never explicitly says not to reuse web-page refs.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 6, "generation_hash": "a438e407c965fa8253f0149e68dabd2c337ca032fd3896375ffc7d170bb6bf9a", "answer_sha256": "a438e407c965fa8253f0149e68dabd2c337ca032fd3896375ffc7d170bb6bf9a", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\n \"score\": 1.0,\n \"pass\": true,\n \"reason\": \"Routes to `skills get electron`, describes the connection (launch or attach, likely CDP, confirm reachable, right window), asks for app state and a fresh snapshot, and warns that refs go stale.\"\n}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes confirming the app connection/CDP reachability, requires state inspection and fresh snapshots before acting, and re-snapshots because refs go stale.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes confirming the app connection (CDP, reachability, correct window), requires snapshot and state checks before acting, and warns that refs go stale and need re-snapshotting.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, describes confirming the app connection (CDP, reachability, correct window), requires a fresh snapshot and state checks before acting, and re-snapshots instead of reusing refs.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, explains attaching to a running instance via a reachable connection, requires a fresh snapshot and correct window before acting, and warns refs go stale and need re-snapshotting.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 0, "generation_hash": "2c8aa09276a001c8221d131b79f046fb1b968fac52a7e13182a8d32e05a82149", "answer_sha256": "2c8aa09276a001c8221d131b79f046fb1b968fac52a7e13182a8d32e05a82149", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes attaching via a remote debugging port, and requires snapshots before acting. It does not explicitly say element refs from web pages must be re-inspected rather than reused.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide and describes attaching via remote debugging port and inspecting state before acting (criteria 1-3 met), but it never explicitly warns against reusing a web page element reference (criterion 4 missed, since it only mentions snapshots generally and calls Electron a Chromium target without caveating reuse).\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide, describes attaching via the Chromium remote debugging port, requires snapshot/state baseline before actions, and insists on target identity so it won't act on the wrong window.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron guide, describes the remote-debugging connection, and requires state inspection before actions, but never warns against blindly reusing web page element references and suggests web snapshot guides as fallback.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide first, describes attaching via the Chromium debug port, and requires snapshots and target identity before acting. It does not explicitly warn against reusing web page element references, so that criterion is only implied.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 1, "generation_hash": "2252afbce7ea7f9902c83004ced74fa44db8c7c402f9471c6bb4e3cf3bc341da", "answer_sha256": "2252afbce7ea7f9902c83004ced74fa44db8c7c402f9471c6bb4e3cf3bc341da", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide with a CDP fallback, describes attaching via a remote debugging port, requires target inventory and a current-state snapshot before actions, and avoids guessing selectors or assuming the right page is attached.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes first to an Electron-specific guide, describes attaching via a localhost remote debugging port with a target inventory, and requires a read-only snapshot before actions; the no-blind-reuse point is implicit in identifying elements from the snapshot rather than guessing selectors.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide with a CDP fallback, describes the remote-debugging attach and target inventory, and requires a read-only snapshot before actions. Item 4 is only implicit, via choosing the correct window and not guessing selectors.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met routing to an Electron guide, connection setup via remote debugging port, and pre-action state inspection; did not explicitly rule out reusing web page references, only implying it by avoiding guessed selectors.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron or CDP guide, describes the remote-debugging attach and target inventory, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and avoids reusing web selectors across multiple Electron windows.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 2, "generation_hash": "2c5e90a3c33280887f5c57b136a4c708bcea050d5cee37d15362d99578163381", "answer_sha256": "2c5e90a3c33280887f5c57b136a4c708bcea050d5cee37d15362d99578163381", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1-3: it routes to the Electron-specific guide, describes attaching via a CDP remote-debugging port, and requires read-only state inspection first. Missed criterion 4: it never explicitly warns against reusing web page element references in the Electron app.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes CDP port attachment, and requires read-only state inspection before actions. It never explicitly warns against blindly reusing web page element references, though target confirmation comes close.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (routes to the Electron guide), 2 (CDP port connection and localhost binding), and 3 (read-only state inspection before actions). Misses 4: it never explicitly warns against reusing web page references, only against assuming targets.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes CDP port attachment, and requires state inspection before actions. It does not explicitly warn against reusing web page references, so criterion 4 is only implicitly met.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes attaching via a CDP remote-debugging port on localhost, and requires read-only state inspection before actions. It never explicitly warns against reusing web-page element references, so criterion 4 is missed.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 3, "generation_hash": "9db22d03632519dfb0c06fe3a580740ed9e32eba0deda24898ac6206ab366017", "answer_sha256": "9db22d03632519dfb0c06fe3a580740ed9e32eba0deda24898ac6206ab366017", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide, describes attaching via a remote debugging port with target title/URL checks, requires app state and a baseline snapshot before actions, and chooses element references from observed state rather than reusing them.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide first, describes attaching via a debugging port with target selection by title/URL, requires state evidence and a baseline snapshot before actions, and avoids reusing stale element references.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide (1), describes attaching via a remote debugging port with localhost and target-title/URL checks (2), requires launch state and a baseline snapshot before actions (3), and chooses element references from observed state rather than reusing them (4).\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide (criterion 1), describes attaching via a remote debugging port with target verification (2), requires state inspection and a baseline snapshot before actions (3), and picks element references from observed page state rather than reusing them (4).\"}", "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron-specific guide and asks for app state and connection details before acting, but never explicitly describes a verified Electron attach step like remote debugging port confirmation tied to a guide, and does not warn against reusing web page refs, so only criteria 1 and 3 are clearly met; criterion 4 is absent and criterion 2 is only partially addressed.\"}" ] }, { "id": "desktop", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 4, "generation_hash": "6d76db35203596fba31ae8bc35b491a9a32d79702736eefcbb798f7370cb3af9", "answer_sha256": "6d76db35203596fba31ae8bc35b491a9a32d79702736eefcbb798f7370cb3af9", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/desktop guide and describes CDP connection and state inspection before acting (criteria 1-3 largely met), but never explicitly warns against reusing web page refs blindly, so criterion 4 is missed; criterion 3 is arguably met via the snapshot requirement.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (routes to the Electron/desktop guide), 2 (CDP connection with remote debugging port and localhost check), and 3 (snapshot and observe-only before acting). Criterion 4 is only implicit: it stresses acting on snapshot elements, not assumptions, but never explicitly warns against reusing web-page references.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide and describes the CDP connection with localhost binding and snapshot-first observation; item 4 is only implied by the warning about hidden windows and assumptions, not stated as avoiding reused web references.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes a CDP connection with a remote debugging port, and requires a snapshot before acting (0.25 each). It never explicitly says to avoid reusing web-page refs, though it stresses targeting the right window and acting on fresh elements, so the fourth criterion is only implied.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes the CDP connection with a localhost-bound port, and requires a snapshot before acting, but never explicitly warns against reusing web page references.\"}" ] }, { "id": "dashboard", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 0, "generation_hash": "102b240f82b41bc4188dd1b3744ab244d146e1b10cce8001502bda544f5bfd94", "answer_sha256": "102b240f82b41bc4188dd1b3744ab244d146e1b10cce8001502bda544f5bfd94", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, treats the session port as an internal detail, and claims no connectivity check.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, and does not require the internal port; it claims no connectivity check was run.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: stays on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied, does not require the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. It does invent a hostname and port 4848 not in the supplied facts.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: stays on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, does not require the internal session port, and claims no connectivity check.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, treats the session port as an internal detail, and claims no connectivity check was run.\"}" ] }, { "id": "dashboard", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 1, "generation_hash": "affcabdf3a7ba7a9f14c809b44e5443f675a889b35663514fe4babfce6f0b1e0", "answer_sha256": "affcabdf3a7ba7a9f14c809b44e5443f675a889b35663514fe4babfce6f0b1e0", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: keeps interaction on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, says the internal session port need not be reached, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (session traffic proxied through dashboard), and 3 (does not require reaching internal session port); missed 4 is satisfied too since no connectivity check is claimed, so score is 1.0 under strict reading, but it asserts port 4848 and an example hostname not in the supplied facts, so 0.75 reflects that invented specifics weaken adherence to 'using the supplied facts.'\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (session traffic proxied through dashboard), and 3 (no internal port required); missed 4 only in the sense of not inventing a check, which it did not do, so this is actually met too, but it asserts 'port 4848' and specifics not in the supplied facts without verification language.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: stays on the forwarded origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, says the internal port need not be reached, and claims no connectivity check was run.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"The response keeps the operator on the forwarded dashboard origin, explains that session traffic is proxied through it, says the internal session port is not needed, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}" ] }, { "id": "dashboard", "mode": "with_skill", "draw_index": 2, "generation_hash": "88b044cbe0527f8a61ec735b708900f4714f8c36a458cc3f2e8088dd7edf7a2e", "answer_sha256": "88b044cbe0527f8a61ec735b708900f4714f8c36a458cc3f2e8088dd7edf7a2e", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four points: stays on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, does not require the session port, and claims no connectivity check. Invented port 4848 is not a rubric miss.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: stays on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, avoids requiring the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. It does invent a port 4848 detail.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, and does not require an internal session port. It claims no connectivity check. It does invent specifics such as port 4848 and the localhost URL, which the rubric does not penalize.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (session traffic proxied through dashboard), and 3 (no internal port exposure required) are met; criterion 4 is met since no connectivity check is claimed, though the response's specific claim about port 4848 is unsupported by the given facts.\"}", "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: it keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, says exposing the session port is unnecessary, and claims no connectivity check was run.\"}" ] }, { "id": "dashboard", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 0, "generation_hash": "dad3e78b4f04b1754f9d8478d03104ccdd051880a57a5e1701088ade14e23d4c", "answer_sha256": "dad3e78b4f04b1754f9d8478d03104ccdd051880a57a5e1701088ade14e23d4c", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met (stays on forwarded origin) and criterion 3 met (does not require internal port). Criterion 2 is missed: the response never says session traffic is proxied through the forwarded origin, instead describing it as a generic path. Criterion 4 is met since no connectivity check is claimed.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, suggests no internal port requirement, and claims no connectivity check. Missed criterion 2 because it never states that session traffic is proxied through the dashboard origin.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 (stay on forwarded origin) and 2 (explains the forwarding/proxy layer carries traffic) and 3 (does not require the internal session port) are met; criterion 4 is met since it claims no successful connectivity check, so all four criteria are satisfied, though the 'proxied through it' explanation is only implicit.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets points 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, doesn't require the internal session port, and claims no connectivity check. It misses point 2 because it never states that session traffic is proxied through the forwarding layer.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, avoids requiring the internal session port, and claims no connectivity check. It misses criterion 2 because it never states that session traffic is proxied through the forwarded origin.\"}" ] }, { "id": "dashboard", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 1, "generation_hash": "d18df5364184ece516f912c21c98d77ba0dc14501e3d3587942d3339ecc3a993", "answer_sha256": "d18df5364184ece516f912c21c98d77ba0dc14501e3d3587942d3339ecc3a993", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on forwarded origin), 2 (explains origin/proxy routing via X-Forwarded headers and base-URL), and 3 (does not require internal port). Missed partial on 2 since it does not clearly state session traffic is proxied through the forwarded origin; 4 satisfied by explicitly noting it hasn't verified anything.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on forwarded origin), 2 (does not explicitly state session traffic is proxied through the dashboard origin, though implied via 'deliberately exposed path'—borderline), 3 (advises against internal port as destination); missed explicit proxying explanation, so partial, and 4 (no invented connectivity check; disclaims verification).\"}", "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1 and 3 are met: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin and does not require the internal port. Criterion 2 is missed because it never says session traffic is proxied through the forwarded origin, and criterion 4 is met since it admits no verification was done.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1 (stay on forwarded origin), 2 (explains proxying via the forwarded origin is the deliberately exposed path, though not explicitly as 'session traffic is proxied'), and 3 (avoids requiring internal port) are met; criterion 4 is met since it explicitly states it hasn't verified anything. Partial credit on criterion 2 given the wording.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (stays on forwarded origin), 2 (proxy/forwarding explained as the deliberate exposed path), and 3 (does not require internal port); misses 4 is satisfied since it explicitly says it hasn't verified anything, so arguably all 4 met, but 'Explain that session traffic is proxied through it' is only implied, not stated, so 0.75.\"}" ] }, { "id": "dashboard", "mode": "baseline", "draw_index": 2, "generation_hash": "a6b86fbdf0ad1a5a9ed0d44ee73b55e39eda3545eec6277e6a9486e8725f8bd3", "answer_sha256": "a6b86fbdf0ad1a5a9ed0d44ee73b55e39eda3545eec6277e6a9486e8725f8bd3", "status": "measured", "judge_outputs": [ "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1, 3, and 4: stays on the forwarded origin, avoids requiring the internal port, and invents no connectivity check. Misses 2, since it never says session traffic is proxied through the origin.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on forwarded origin), 2 (explains forwarding/proxy layer carries access path), and 3 (advises not to use internal port); missed 4 is satisfied since it doesn't claim a connectivity check, so all four are met, but it hedges with 'probably' and says it hasn't seen addresses, which is honest rather than invented.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, avoids requiring the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. It only implicitly covers criterion 2 by noting the forwarding layer makes the dashboard reachable, without stating that session traffic is proxied through it.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Met criterion 1 (stays on the forwarded origin) and criterion 3 (does not require the internal port), but missed criterion 2 by never stating session traffic is proxied through the origin, and criterion 4 is met since it invents no connectivity check.\"}", "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, avoids the internal port, and makes no false connectivity claim. Criterion 2 is only implied, since it never states that session traffic is proxied through the origin.\"}" ] } ] }