{
  "format": "driftproof-answers/2",
  "receipt_hash": "5d537a57fb3d2f578c43ba3c97554ce3f9dd3c875b3749cedfd1a3faa0314af8",
  "model_id": "claude-opus-5-5",
  "answers": {
    "599b8415cb15676c9c5e623f15874c538856d98502221b49743e257323b0de68": "Here's a read-only plan. I haven't run anything. The only commands I can state with confidence are the `skills get` ones. Everything after that should be checked against the guide the CLI serves, because the skill stub says that guide matches the installed version.\n\n## Step 1: Load the workflow guide\n\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core\n```\n\nFrom the output, find:\n- the command to open or navigate to a URL\n- the command to take an accessibility-tree snapshot, and any flags for interactive-only or compact output\n- how `@eN` refs are shown and how long they stay valid (for example, whether they go stale after navigation)\n- any read-only inspection commands, such as getting an element's text or attributes\n\nIf the core guide doesn't cover inspection or snapshot options well enough, run `agent-browser skills get core --full` for the full command reference.\n\n## Step 2: Open the checkout page\n\nUse the navigation command from the guide with the checkout URL. I don't have that URL yet. If the checkout page requires login or a cart with items, decide how to handle that before going further. The guide covers sessions and saved state.\n\n## Step 3: Take a snapshot\n\nRun the snapshot command, filtered to interactive elements if the guide offers that. The output lists form controls with their roles, accessible names and `@eN` refs.\n\n## Step 4: Find the Submit button in the snapshot\n\nIn the snapshot output, look for:\n- a `button` role, or an input of type submit, inside the checkout form\n- an accessible name like \"Place order\", \"Submit\", \"Pay now\" or \"Complete purchase\"\n- whether there's more than one candidate, such as a separate PayPal or express-pay button, or a disabled state\n\nUse the `@eN` ref exactly as it appears in that output. I won't guess refs before a snapshot exists.\n\n## Step 5: Optionally confirm without acting\n\nIf the guide has read-only queries, such as getting an element's text, attributes or enabled state, use them on the candidate ref to confirm it's the form's submit control.\n\n## Guardrails\n\n- **Don't click, press Enter in or submit the form.** On a checkout page that could place a real order or charge a card, which can't be undone.\n- Don't type into payment fields. Inspection doesn't need any input.\n- Take a new snapshot before using refs again after any navigation or page change.\n\nWhen you can share the URL and allow tool use, the first thing I'll run is `agent-browser skills get core`.",
    "d6c8fc60fdff3729fb646ea9feb229753b92fbc974f8f575fc7fc3d1f8ed6362": "The stub only documents the `skills` commands, so the plan starts by loading the real guide. Anything beyond that is described by intent, and you should confirm the exact syntax against the loaded guide.\n\n## Step 1: Load the workflow guide (read-only, local)\n\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core\n```\n\nThis gives the version-matched workflows and patterns. If you need exact command syntax for navigation or snapshots, load the full reference:\n\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core --full\n```\n\nIf the checkout page needs a login, check whether the guide covers the authentication vault or session state before going further.\n\n## Step 2: Open the checkout page\n\nUse the guide's navigation command to open the checkout URL. You'll need to supply the URL. Navigation is read-only as long as you only load the page.\n\n## Step 3: Take an accessibility-tree snapshot\n\nRun the snapshot command from the guide. It returns the page's accessibility tree with compact `@eN` references. These refs come from the live page, so I can't predict them here.\n\n## Step 4: Identify the Submit button from the snapshot\n\nIn the snapshot output, look for:\n- A node with the **button** role, or a submit-type input, inside the checkout **form**\n- An accessible name such as \"Submit\", \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", or \"Complete purchase\"\n- Whether it is **disabled**. Many checkout buttons stay disabled until the required fields are valid.\n\nRecord its actual `@eN` ref and label exactly as the snapshot shows them.\n\n## Step 5: Optional visual confirmation\n\nIf the guide documents a screenshot command, take one to confirm that the identified element is the visible primary submit control. This matters when the page has several buttons, such as \"Apply coupon\" or \"Continue as guest\".\n\n## What not to do yet\n\n- **Don't click or submit.** Submitting a checkout form can place a real order or charge a card. Get explicit confirmation first, and ideally use a test or sandbox environment.\n- **Don't fill in payment fields** unless you're on a test environment with test card data.\n- **Don't reuse `@eN` refs** after the page changes. Take a new snapshot after any navigation or DOM update.\n\n## Inputs I'd need from you\n\n- The checkout URL\n- Whether it's a production or test environment\n- Whether the page needs an authenticated session",
    "ce1baa02be0648e700d0e50b86a4d996a20d20eb5817a7b8414734172d67653a": "Here's a read-only plan. I haven't run anything, and the exact command syntax beyond what the skill stub shows still needs confirming from the CLI's own guide.\n\n## Step 1: Load the workflow guide\n\nThe installed skill file only points to the real instructions, so this comes first:\n\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core\n```\n\nIf you need exact flags for opening pages, taking snapshots, or querying elements, use:\n\n```bash\nagent-browser skills get core --full\n```\n\nCheck these points in the output before going further:\n- The command to open or navigate to a URL\n- The command to take an accessibility-tree snapshot and how `@eN` refs are shown\n- Whether refs stay valid after navigation or DOM changes, or whether you need a fresh snapshot\n- Any read-only inspection commands (get text, attributes, element state) that don't click or type\n\n## Step 2: Open the checkout page\n\nUse the navigation command from the guide with the checkout URL. If the page requires login or a cart session, check what the guide says about sessions or state before going further. Don't log in or add items unless you've authorized that.\n\n## Step 3: Take an accessibility snapshot\n\nUse the snapshot command from the guide. In the output, look for:\n- The `form` landmark or region for checkout\n- Elements with role `button`, and any input with type `submit`\n- Accessible names such as \"Submit\", \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", \"Complete purchase\" or \"Continue\"\n\n## Step 4: Confirm the Submit button without activating it\n\n- Note the `@eN` ref the snapshot gives to the candidate button. Don't assume a ref in advance; use only what the snapshot actually shows.\n- If the guide lists read-only queries, use them on that ref to confirm its text, its `type=\"submit\"`, whether it's enabled or disabled, and that it sits inside the checkout form.\n- If several buttons match (for example \"Apply coupon\" and \"Place order\"), tell them apart by their form context and accessible name.\n- Optionally take a screenshot for visual confirmation, if the guide includes that command.\n\n## Step 5: Stop before any action\n\nDon't click, submit, or fill payment fields. Submitting a checkout form can place a real order or charge a card. Report the identified ref, its accessible name, its enabled state, and its form context. Get your explicit go-ahead before any interaction.\n\n---\n\nOnce you approve, the first command to run is `agent-browser skills get core`.",
    "2c3ecafac6779a9a888b3e4d7b564c2b82258edf22b2bd37d2fffd49512b49ac": "Here's a read-only plan for when tool use is allowed. I don't know which browser CLI is installed or its exact command syntax, so the steps describe intent rather than exact commands.\n\n## Step 0: Load the workflow guide first\n\nBefore touching the page, read the CLI's own documentation, for example its `--help` output or its bundled guide or skill file. You need to confirm:\n- How to open or navigate to a URL\n- How to take a page snapshot, such as an accessibility tree or DOM outline, and what format the element references take\n- Whether references are stable across snapshots or regenerated each time\n- Which commands are read-only (navigate, snapshot, screenshot, get text) and which change state (click, fill, submit)\n\nDon't guess command names or reference formats until this is done.\n\n## Step 1: Open the checkout page\n\n- Navigate to the checkout URL the user supplies.\n- Wait for the page to finish loading. If the guide describes a wait or network-idle option, use it.\n- Note any redirect to login or cart. If that happens, stop and report it. Don't sign in or add items without explicit approval.\n\n## Step 2: Capture a snapshot\n\n- Take an accessibility or DOM snapshot of the page.\n- Optionally take a screenshot to cross-check what you see.\n- Element references come only from this output. Don't create or reuse references from memory.\n\n## Step 3: Locate the form\n\n- In the snapshot, find the `form` element or region containing checkout fields such as name, address, and payment.\n- If there are several forms (newsletter signup, coupon code, search), identify which one is the checkout form by its fields and headings.\n\n## Step 4: Identify Submit button candidates\n\nWithin the checkout form, list elements matching any of:\n- `role=button` or `<button>` with names like \"Place order\", \"Submit\", \"Pay now\", \"Complete purchase\", or \"Continue\"\n- `<input type=\"submit\">` or `<button type=\"submit\">`, including buttons with no `type` inside a form, since those default to submit\n\nFor each candidate, record from the snapshot:\n- Its reference as given by the tool\n- Its accessible name and visible text\n- Whether it's inside the checkout form\n- Whether it's enabled or disabled, visible or hidden\n\n## Step 5: Disambiguate\n\n- Exclude buttons that only apply coupons, buttons that edit the cart, and buttons that belong to other forms.\n- If the checkout spans multiple steps, the final Submit may not exist yet. Report the current step's primary button, such as \"Continue to payment\", and say that it isn't the final submit.\n- If more than one candidate remains, report all of them with your reasoning rather than picking one silently.\n\n## Step 6: Report, don't act\n\nOutput the identified button's reference exactly as the snapshot gave it, along with its name and the evidence for your choice.\n\nDo not click, fill fields, or submit. Placing an order is outward-facing and may be irreversible, so any interaction needs separate, explicit confirmation from the user.",
    "dbe28c4bf62d71d9ab1614972adbaf136893df24d3d3dfb671aa9cc0eb184397": "# Plan: Inspect a checkout form and identify its Submit button\n\nI don't know the browser CLI's exact name, subcommands, or reference format because its workflow guide hasn't been loaded. So this plan describes each step by intent rather than by syntax. Once the guide is loaded, map each step to the real command.\n\n## Step 1: Load the workflow guide (read-only)\n- Read the CLI's built-in help or workflow guide, such as its top-level help or a \"guide\"/\"docs\" subcommand if it has one.\n- From it, find out:\n  - How to open or attach to a page or session.\n  - How to take a page snapshot or accessibility tree, and how elements are referenced in the output (IDs, refs, selectors).\n  - Which commands are read-only and which interact (click, type, submit).\n- Don't go further until you know the real command names and the reference format.\n\n## Step 2: Open the checkout page\n- Navigate to the checkout URL, or attach to an existing session if the guide says that's the pattern.\n- Confirm the final URL and page title in the output. Watch for redirects to login or an empty cart, since those mean you're not looking at the real form.\n\n## Step 3: Take a read-only snapshot\n- Capture the accessibility tree or DOM snapshot, scoped to the form if the CLI supports that.\n- Optionally take a screenshot for visual confirmation.\n\n## Step 4: Identify the Submit button from the snapshot\nLook for candidates that match:\n- **Role:** `button`, or an input of type `submit`.\n- **Accessible name:** for example \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", \"Complete purchase\", \"Submit\", or \"Continue\".\n- **Location:** inside the checkout `<form>`. Skip header, cart, or newsletter buttons.\n- **State:** whether it's enabled or disabled. It's often disabled until required fields are filled in.\n\nIf several candidates match, record all of them along with their surrounding context instead of guessing.\n\n## Step 5: Record the reference exactly as the CLI reports it\n- Copy the element reference verbatim from the snapshot output. Don't construct or guess one.\n- Note that refs may only be valid for that snapshot. Check the guide on whether to re-snapshot before any later action.\n\n## Step 6: Stop before interacting\n- Don't click, type, or submit. On a checkout form, submitting can place a real order or charge a card.\n- If a later task needs interaction, confirm it first and use a test or sandbox environment.\n\n## Output to report back\n- The page URL and title.\n- The Submit button's role, accessible name, enabled/disabled state, and its ref exactly as the CLI gave it.\n- Any ambiguity, such as multiple candidates or a button outside the form.",
    "b42b90e57fbb65ad5fb32bc1ae9be78474426faf258973c2928045296fe6ca4b": "# Plan: Inspect a checkout form and identify its Submit button (read-only)\n\nI don't know this CLI's command syntax, so the steps below describe what each step does rather than giving exact commands. I also won't name any element references until a real page snapshot provides them.\n\n## Step 1: Load the workflow guide first\n- Read the CLI's own documentation before doing anything else. That could be its `--help` output, a bundled workflow or skill guide, or a README.\n- From it, confirm the actual commands for:\n  - opening or navigating to a URL\n  - taking a page snapshot (accessibility tree or DOM)\n  - querying or inspecting a single element\n- Note how the CLI labels elements in a snapshot (refs, IDs, indices) and whether those labels change between snapshots.\n\n## Step 2: Open the checkout page\n- Navigate to the checkout URL. You'll need to supply it, since it wasn't given.\n- If checkout requires a cart or login state, stop and decide how to reach that state. Don't fill in forms or log in without agreement.\n\n## Step 3: Take a snapshot\n- Capture the page structure using the snapshot command found in Step 1.\n- Find the `<form>` (or `role=\"form\"`) that contains the checkout fields, such as address and payment.\n\n## Step 4: Find Submit button candidates within that form\nLook for:\n- `<button type=\"submit\">`, or a `<button>` with no type inside a form (which defaults to submit)\n- `<input type=\"submit\">` or `<input type=\"image\">`\n- elements with `role=\"button\"` and a name like \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", \"Submit\", or \"Complete purchase\"\n- buttons outside the form linked to it through the `form=\"<form-id>\"` attribute\n\n## Step 5: Narrow to one button and verify it\n- Record each candidate's ref, role, accessible name, `type`, `disabled` state, and visibility.\n- Exclude look-alikes such as \"Apply coupon\" (often its own submit button), \"Back to cart\", and express-pay buttons (often iframes).\n- If more than one candidate remains, check which one is the form's default submit, meaning the first submit-type control in DOM order.\n\n## Step 6: Report back without clicking\n- Give the button's real ref from the snapshot, its accessible name, its selector or attributes, and its current state.\n- Clicking or submitting is out of scope. It could place a real order, so it needs separate, explicit approval.\n\n## Inputs needed from you\n- The checkout URL\n- Any preconditions, such as cart contents or a test account\n- Confirmation that this is a test or staging environment, if any interaction beyond inspection is ever wanted",
    "9b1afd7794322cee09a33488c4a40901ee9b1d60fff3df717604e05beb7ae460": "# Plan: Inspect the checkout form and find its Submit button (read-only)\n\nI don't know which browser CLI is installed or what its exact commands are. The steps below use placeholders like `<cli>`. Load the guide before running any of them.\n\n## 1. Load the workflow guide first\n- Read the CLI's own documentation: its top-level help (`<cli> --help` or `<cli> help`) or its bundled workflow or skill guide.\n- Find these things in it:\n  - how to open or navigate to a URL\n  - how to take a page snapshot (accessibility tree or DOM) and what element references look like\n  - whether references stay valid after navigation or re-render, or must be refreshed\n  - which commands are read-only (snapshot, get text, get attribute, screenshot) and which have side effects (click, fill, submit)\n- Don't guess command names or flags. Use only what the guide documents.\n\n## 2. Open the checkout page\n- Navigate to the checkout URL with the documented open/navigate command.\n- Wait for the page to load. If the form is rendered by JavaScript, use the documented wait (network idle or a wait for a selector).\n\n## 3. Take a snapshot\n- Capture an accessibility or DOM snapshot of the page.\n- Optionally take a screenshot to confirm visually that you're on the right page and the form is showing.\n\n## 4. Find the form and its candidate buttons in the snapshot\n- Find the checkout `form` element, or the region containing the payment and address fields.\n- Inside it, list the button-like elements:\n  - `button` elements (note any explicit `type=\"submit\"`; a `<button>` inside a form defaults to submit unless `type=\"button\"` is set)\n  - `input[type=submit]` and `input[type=image]`\n  - elements with `role=\"button\"` (common in JS frameworks, but these don't submit natively)\n- For each candidate, record the accessible name (\"Place order\", \"Pay now\", \"Continue\", \"Submit\"), its type, its disabled state, and which form it belongs to. A button outside the form can still submit it through the `form=\"id\"` attribute.\n\n## 5. Decide which one is the Submit button\n- Prefer the element that actually submits the checkout form (correct type and form association) over one that merely says \"Submit\".\n- Rule out lookalikes such as \"Apply coupon\", \"Back\", \"Edit cart\", or \"Continue to shipping\" on multi-step flows.\n- If the checkout has several steps, note which step you're on. The final submit may only appear later.\n\n## 6. Verify without side effects\n- Use read-only queries such as getting text, attributes, or the bounding box to confirm the chosen element's details.\n- **Do not click, fill, or press Enter.** Submitting a checkout form could place a real order or charge a card. If interaction is needed later, use a test or sandbox environment and get explicit approval first.\n\n## 7. Report back\n- Report the element reference **exactly as the snapshot gave it**, along with its accessible name, type, form association, and disabled state.\n- Note any uncertainty, such as more than one plausible submit button or a button that only enables after the fields are valid.",
    "9b72fd0ebe0757b72c8567003b4e76011e959903a86e4ffe753f47bea02cd91f": "# Plan: Inspect the checkout form and identify its Submit button (read-only)\n\nI don't know the browser CLI's exact command names or flags, because its workflow guide hasn't been loaded. The commands below describe what each step should do, not real syntax. I also won't name any element reference. Those come from a snapshot that hasn't been taken yet.\n\n## Next steps\n\n1. **Load the CLI's workflow guide first.**\n   Read its help output or bundled guide. Confirm the actual commands for:\n   - opening or navigating to a URL\n   - taking a page snapshot (accessibility tree or DOM)\n   - querying or inspecting an element\n   - how element references are formatted, and how long they stay valid\n\n   Everything after this step depends on what the guide says.\n\n2. **Open the checkout page.**\n   Navigate to the checkout URL using the guide's navigation command. Wait for the page to finish loading, including any client-side rendering.\n\n3. **Take a read-only snapshot.**\n   Capture the accessibility tree or DOM snapshot. Do not click, type, or submit anything.\n\n4. **Locate the checkout form in the snapshot.**\n   Look for:\n   - a `form` element or landmark\n   - payment, address, or order-summary fields\n   - a heading such as \"Checkout\" or \"Payment\"\n\n5. **Identify Submit candidates inside that form.**\n   Filter for:\n   - `role=button` elements\n   - `<button type=\"submit\">` or `<input type=\"submit\">`\n   - accessible names like \"Place order\", \"Pay now\", \"Submit\", or \"Complete purchase\"\n\n   Record the element reference exactly as the snapshot reports it.\n\n6. **Disambiguate if there are several candidates.** Prefer the one that:\n   - is a descendant of the checkout form\n   - has `type=submit`\n   - is visible and enabled\n\n   Rule out lookalikes such as \"Apply coupon\", \"Continue shopping\", or header buttons.\n\n7. **Verify without acting.**\n   Use a read-only inspect or query command, if the guide provides one. Confirm the element's role, name, type, enabled state, and parent form.\n\n8. **Report and stop.**\n   Return the reference, accessible name, and supporting evidence. Before any click or submission, get explicit confirmation, since submitting a checkout could place a real order.\n\n## Caveats\n\n- Element references are often tied to one snapshot. If the page changes, take a new snapshot before reusing a reference.\n- If the form sits in an iframe (common for payment widgets), check the guide for how to snapshot inside frames.",
    "fe5f6689849b14b6c198737cf12ae3472596ce4b46f767e675e731db0887159b": "## Which guides to consult\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get core`** first. The stub says to load this before running *any* `agent-browser` command. It covers the general workflows, common patterns, and troubleshooting that the Electron guide likely builds on. If I needed exact flags, I'd add `--full` for the command reference and templates.\n2. **`agent-browser skills get electron`** next. This is the specialized guide for Electron desktop apps such as VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, and Spotify. Inspecting an Electron app falls outside ordinary browser pages, which is when the stub says to load a specialized skill.\n3. **Possibly `agent-browser skills get slack`**, but only if the target app is Slack and the task is workspace-level, like unreads, messages, or search.\n4. **`agent-browser skills list`** if I'm unsure what the installed version offers. The guide names in the stub might not all exist in every release.\n\nI would not rely on the stub for usage details. It says the CLI serves content that matches the installed version, and the stub itself can't change between releases. I haven't read either guide, so I can't tell you their actual instructions. Anything specific I said about Electron connection steps would be a guess.\n\n## Evidence needed before interacting\n\n**From the guides, since this is only knowable by reading them:**\n- How agent-browser attaches to an Electron app. Electron is Chromium-based and agent-browser drives Chrome via CDP, so I'd expect a debugging-port or launch-flag mechanism. I'd confirm the exact method and syntax from the `electron` guide rather than assume.\n- Whether the app must be launched by agent-browser or can be attached to while already running.\n- Known limitations or troubleshooting steps, such as multiple windows/webviews, or apps that disable remote debugging.\n\n**About the environment:**\n- That agent-browser is actually installed, and its version, because guide content is version-specific.\n- Which Electron app it is, where it's installed, and whether it's currently running. Restarting it with debugging enabled could interrupt your work or lose unsaved state.\n- The platform (here, Linux), since launch paths and flags differ by OS.\n\n**About scope and authorization:**\n- What \"inspect\" means for you: read-only snapshots and screenshots, or clicking and typing too.\n- Whether the app is logged into real accounts, such as Slack or Notion. Any action there, like sending a message or changing a setting, is outward-facing and possibly irreversible, so I'd confirm before doing anything beyond observation.\n- That you own or are authorized to automate this app and account.\n\n**At interaction time:**\n- A fresh accessibility-tree snapshot to get current `@eN` refs before acting on any element. I'd take a new snapshot after each navigation or UI change instead of reusing stale refs.\n\n## Order of operations\n\n1. Read the `core` guide.\n2. Read the `electron` guide.\n3. Confirm the installed version, the target app, its running state, and the scope you want.\n4. Connect using the guide's documented method.\n5. Take a snapshot.\n6. Only then interact, starting read-only and asking before any state-changing action.",
    "ae96231a1a4ce71966c40c3d84aaf486a0663fdc22a72637cd2b6e3129f92421": "# Which guide to consult\n\nThe local skill file for agent-browser is only a short pointer. It says to load the real instructions from the installed CLI so they match the installed version. For an Electron app I would load two guides, in this order:\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get core`** — The pointer says to load this before running any `agent-browser` command. It covers the basic workflows, snapshots, `@eN` element refs and troubleshooting. The Electron guide likely assumes you already know these.\n2. **`agent-browser skills get electron`** — This is the specialized guide for Electron desktop apps such as VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma and Notion. Desktop apps fall outside normal web-page automation, which is the case the pointer routes to this guide.\n\nIf I needed exact flags or command syntax, I would also check `agent-browser skills get core --full`. If either guide name failed, `agent-browser skills list` would confirm what the installed version offers.\n\n# What I still need before interacting\n\nI don't have the text of either guide. The pointer says nothing about how the Electron workflow works, so I won't guess at the commands. Before touching the app, I'd want:\n\n- **The output of `skills get electron`** (and `core`). This is the authoritative source for how agent-browser attaches to an Electron app. It should show whether you launch the app with a debugging port, connect to an existing CDP endpoint, or use some other method.\n- **The installed agent-browser version**, or confirmation that the guide came from the CLI actually in use, since behavior can change between releases.\n- **Which app and how it's running.** I'd need the app name, whether it's already open, and whether it was started in a way that exposes Chrome DevTools Protocol. In general, Electron apps are Chromium-based and can expose CDP. Whether that's needed here, and how, is for the guide to say.\n- **The target window or page.** Electron apps often have several windows or webviews, so I'd need to know which one to inspect.\n- **The scope of \"inspect.\"** Is it read-only, like snapshots, screenshots and reading the accessibility tree? Or does it include clicking, typing or sending anything? For apps like Slack, an action could post messages or change account state. I'd confirm with you before doing anything with outside effects.\n- **Session or account context.** I'd need to know whether the app is logged into a real account. If so, I'd treat its data as sensitive and stay within what you ask for.\n\nOnce I had the guide output and those details, the first step would be a read-only look at the target window, probably an accessibility-tree snapshot, if the guide supports that. Any interaction would come after that.",
    "1501a7d61777b7833c8ee2032742841a1d57446d807d39711913806e6090e074": "## Which guide I'd consult\n\n1. **`agent-browser skills get core`**: The skill file is only a discovery stub. It says to load the core guide before running any `agent-browser` command. Core covers the base workflows, common patterns, and troubleshooting that the Electron guide builds on.\n2. **`agent-browser skills get electron`**: This is the specialized guide for Electron desktop apps such as VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, and Notion. It's the one that actually applies to your task.\n3. **Optionally `agent-browser skills get core --full`**: Use this if I need the exact command reference and templates rather than just the workflow overview.\n\nThe CLI serves these guides so they match the installed version. That's why I'd read them rather than rely on memory or the stub.\n\n## Evidence I need before interacting\n\n**From the guides (not yet seen):**\n- How the Electron workflow connects to the app. I know agent-browser drives Chrome/Chromium over CDP. But I haven't seen the exact connection method, flags, or launch steps for Electron. I won't guess at them.\n- Any prerequisites, caveats, or troubleshooting the Electron guide lists.\n\n**About the installed tool:**\n- That `agent-browser` is installed, and which version. The guide content depends on it, and `agent-browser skills list` would confirm that the `electron` skill exists in that version.\n\n**About the target app:**\n- Which Electron app it is, and whether it's already running or needs to be launched in a specific way to be inspectable.\n- Whether it's your own app or a third-party app you're authorized to automate. This matters most for apps holding accounts or messages, like Slack or Discord.\n\n**About intent and scope:**\n- Whether you want read-only inspection (snapshots, screenshots, element trees) or actual interaction (clicks, typing, sending messages).\n- Anything outward-facing, like sending a message or changing settings, should get your explicit confirmation first.\n\n## Order of operations, once tools are allowed\n\n1. Read `skills get core`.\n2. Read `skills get electron`.\n3. Confirm the app and connection method match what the guide describes.\n4. Take a non-mutating snapshot to see the accessibility tree and `@eN` element refs.\n5. Only then interact, and confirm with you before any action that sends data or can't be undone.",
    "340f51374b7fb35f098a98aca214ebe6201804f08aae1cd5e5874dea8bbe0459": "Since I can't run anything, I can't see which guides your installed version serves, so I won't guess exact names or flags. Here's the approach I'd take.\n\n## Which guide to consult\n\n1. **Start with the CLI's own guide index.** List the guides it can serve and confirm your `agent-browser` version, so the guide matches your binary.\n2. **Pick the Electron or desktop-app guide if one exists.** If there isn't one, use the guide on **connecting to an existing browser over CDP (Chrome DevTools Protocol)**. Electron apps are Chromium underneath, so agent-browser attaches to a running app's debugging endpoint rather than launching its own browser.\n3. **Then read the core interaction guide** for the snapshot and ref workflow before issuing any clicks or typing.\n\nTreat the served guide as authoritative over my memory for command syntax.\n\n## Evidence to gather before interacting\n\n**Confirm the target and your authorization**\n- You own the app or are authorized to inspect it.\n- It really is Electron. Look for an Electron framework or binary in the install, and a `resources/app.asar` or `resources/app/` folder.\n- Note the app's version. Ideally run it against a test profile or test data, not your real account.\n\n**Confirm a debugging endpoint is available**\n- Find out whether the app can be launched with a remote-debugging port (typically `--remote-debugging-port=<port>`). Some apps strip or block that switch, and if so the CDP route won't work.\n- Check which port it is actually listening on.\n- Check that the port is bound to localhost only. An exposed CDP port gives anyone on the network full control of the app.\n\n**Confirm the endpoint responds**\n- The CDP version endpoint (`/json/version`) should report the Chromium/Electron version and a WebSocket debugger URL.\n- The target list (`/json/list`) should show the windows, so you can identify the right page. There may be several targets, such as the main window, splash or hidden windows, DevTools, or webviews. You need the correct target's title or URL before attaching.\n\n**Confirm the connection works, read-only, before acting**\n- After attaching, take a snapshot first, without clicking or typing.\n- Check that the page title or URL matches the window you expected.\n- Check that the accessibility tree contains the elements you care about, with refs you can target.\n- If the snapshot is empty or wrong, you're probably on the wrong target. Fix that before doing anything else.\n\n**Assess the risk of interacting**\n- Find out whether actions trigger real side effects, such as sync, purchases, sending messages, or deleting data.\n- Interact only once you have the right target, a fresh snapshot with valid refs, and acceptable side-effect risk. Re-snapshot after each navigation, because refs go stale.\n\nIf you share the guide list your CLI prints, I can tell you exactly which one to open.",
    "954989e06d6df4b752ddeefd84fdca3817f77ea99b61528e369b8a890b555189": "## Which guide to consult\n\nI'd consult the **Electron-specific guide** that the installed agent-browser CLI serves. If there isn't one, I'd use the guide on **connecting to an existing browser over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP)**, since that's how agent-browser attaches to an Electron app.\n\nI can't confirm the exact guide name or the command that lists guides without running the CLI. Its help output or guide index would be the source of truth. I'd take the guide's wording over my general knowledge, because flags and subcommands change between versions.\n\n## Evidence I'd need before interacting\n\n**1. The tool itself**\n- The installed agent-browser version, so the guide matches the binary.\n- The exact connect syntax from that guide, such as a CDP port flag or `connect` subcommand. I wouldn't guess it.\n\n**2. That the Electron app exposes a debug endpoint**\n- Whether the app was launched with remote debugging enabled, typically `--remote-debugging-port=<port>`.\n- Whether the app allows this at all. Packaged apps can disable it through Electron fuses or by stripping the flag.\n- The port number in use, and that it's bound to localhost only.\n\n**3. That the endpoint is reachable and correct**\n- A response from the CDP discovery endpoint, typically `http://localhost:<port>/json/version` and `/json/list`.\n- The list of targets. Electron apps often have several windows, webviews or background pages, and you need to know which one is the real UI.\n\n**4. The app's current state, captured before acting**\n- An initial **snapshot** of the chosen target, such as an accessibility tree or element refs, and ideally a screenshot. This confirms you're attached to the intended window.\n- Element references taken from that snapshot, not from assumptions about the DOM.\n\n**5. Scope and safety**\n- Confirmation that you own the app or are authorized to inspect it.\n- Whether it's connected to real accounts or data. Clicks and form submissions can have real side effects, so a test profile or test data is preferable.\n- Awareness that an open debug port gives full control of the app to any local process. Close it when you're done.\n\nOnly once 1–4 check out would I start interacting, and I'd take a fresh snapshot after each action, since refs go stale when the UI changes.",
    "2426203ed218376b09d74d46dc8a726534713129bb658e06d46a2ccae41d2288": "I can't name the exact guide with certainty. The only fact supplied is that the installed CLI serves its own guides. I haven't seen its guide list, and I won't guess a name. Here's how I'd approach it.\n\n## Which guide to consult\n\n1. **Start with the CLI's guide index** (its help or list-guides output). That tells me what's actually available in *this* installed version, rather than what I remember from docs that may have changed.\n2. **Pick the Electron/desktop-app guide if one exists.** It's the most specific match. Electron apps aren't opened like a normal URL. You usually attach to an already-running app over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), and that guide should explain how this CLI expects to do that.\n3. **If there's no Electron guide,** I'd fall back to the guide on connecting to an existing browser over CDP or a remote debugging port, plus the core \"snapshot / refs / interaction\" guide.\n\nI'd read the guide before running anything. The point is to learn the expected flags and connection method, not to improvise them.\n\n## Evidence I'd want before interacting\n\n**Authorization and scope**\n- Confirmation that you own the app or are allowed to automate and inspect it.\n- What \"inspect\" means for you: read-only observation, or clicking and typing too. Some actions may change real data, send messages, or hit production backends.\n\n**How the app is running**\n- The app's executable path, and whether it's already running.\n- Whether it was started with a remote debugging port (e.g. `--remote-debugging-port=<port>`). If not, I need to know whether relaunching it with that flag is acceptable. Relaunching may lose unsaved state.\n- Whether the app disables or restricts remote debugging. Some production Electron builds do, via fuses or command-line checks.\n\n**Connection details**\n- The CDP endpoint (host:port) and evidence that it responds, e.g. the `/json/version` and `/json/list` target listing.\n- Which targets exist. Electron often exposes several windows, webviews, or hidden background pages, and I need to know which one is the window you care about.\n- Electron/Chromium version, if the guide notes compatibility limits.\n\n**Baseline state**\n- An initial snapshot (accessibility tree or screenshot) of the chosen target, captured before any interaction. This confirms I'm attached to the right window and gives a reference for what any later action changed.\n\nOnly once I have the guide's instructions, a confirmed CDP endpoint, the correct target, and your go-ahead on scope would I start interacting. Even then I'd begin with read-only snapshots before any clicks or input.",
    "746e300d0b3f9d56c3af6f9509958cf0575c4a0a0d76aeb992725e9a85566a3d": "I can't confirm exact guide names or flags without running the CLI, so the specifics below are what I'd look for, not verified commands.\n\n## Which guide to consult\n\n1. **Start with the CLI's guide index.** The first step is the listing of available guides, through the tool's help or docs subcommand. I wouldn't guess a guide name.\n2. **Pick the Electron or desktop-app guide if one exists.** Electron apps are Chromium underneath, so agent-browser usually controls them by attaching to an existing app over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), not by launching its own browser. That guide should cover how to connect.\n3. **If there's no Electron guide, use the \"connect to an existing browser / CDP\" guide.** It covers the same mechanism.\n4. **Read the core snapshot-and-interaction guide too.** It explains how elements are referenced (accessibility snapshots, element refs) and when those refs go stale.\n\n## Evidence needed before interacting\n\n**Connection prerequisites**\n- **The app's launch method.** Was it started with a remote debugging flag (typically `--remote-debugging-port=<port>`)? If not, it must be relaunched with one. Some apps disable this flag, which the guide or a failed connection would show.\n- **A reachable CDP endpoint.** You need confirmation that the debugging port is listening locally and returns target and version info.\n- **The installed agent-browser version.** You need to know it supports connecting to an existing CDP endpoint, and the exact syntax, from the guide for your installed version.\n\n**Target identification**\n- **The list of debuggable targets.** Electron apps often expose several: the main window, hidden or background windows, devtools, and webviews. You need the target's title or URL to attach to the correct one.\n- **Window state.** Confirm the target window is loaded and not mid-navigation or behind a splash screen.\n\n**Page state before acting**\n- **A fresh snapshot of the attached target.** This confirms you're seeing the expected UI and gives you current element refs. Take a new one after any navigation or major UI change.\n- **Read-only checks first.** Use title, URL, or a screenshot to confirm the attachment before any click or typed input.\n\n**Scope and safety**\n- **Authorization.** Confirm you own the app or are allowed to automate it, especially if it's logged into a real account.\n- **The consequences of each action.** Know what clicks or form submissions will do, since they act on live data. Prefer a test profile or account where possible.\n- **Exposure of the debugging port.** Bind it to localhost only, because an open CDP port gives full control of the app.\n\n**In short:** consult the guide index, then the Electron/CDP-connect guide. Before interacting, establish that a CDP endpoint is up, that you've identified the correct window target, that a current snapshot confirms the UI state, and that you're authorized to act on that app and account.",
    "870458139c6906edffcee7ff927f2ad9110f0d2d2b45edc3b313130800976928": "# Inspecting an Electron app with agent-browser\n\nYou mentioned the installed CLI can serve its own guides, but I don't have the guide list, their names, or the CLI version. So I can say which kind of guide to consult and why, but not quote exact guide names or commands.\n\n## Which guide to consult\n\n1. **The guide index first.** Ask the CLI to list its available guides, using whatever list or help subcommand its top-level help shows. This tells you the real guide names for your installed version, so you don't have to rely on names remembered from docs or other versions.\n2. **Then the Electron or desktop-app guide**, if one exists. Electron apps aren't launched like a normal headless browser session. Typically agent-browser has to attach to an already-running Chromium instance over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP). A dedicated guide should explain how this version does that.\n3. **If there is no Electron guide**, fall back to the guide on connecting to an existing browser over CDP. Electron is Chromium underneath, so that is the relevant mechanism.\n\nI'd prefer the version-matched guide served by the CLI over online docs or my own memory of the tool. Flags and subcommands change between releases.\n\n## Evidence to gather before interacting\n\n**From the guide itself**\n- The exact attach mechanism for this version, such as a connect command, a `--cdp`-style option, or a port or WebSocket URL argument.\n- Any stated prerequisites or limitations for Electron, like supported versions, sandboxing, or multi-window behavior.\n\n**About the target app**\n- How the app is launched with remote debugging enabled. For Chromium-based apps this is usually a `--remote-debugging-port=<port>` switch. Some packaged apps disable or ignore it, so confirm it works for this app.\n- That the debugging endpoint actually responds. The target list should show the app's windows or pages.\n- Which target is the one you want. Electron apps often expose several, such as the main window, hidden windows, devtools, or service workers. Pick the right one by its URL or title.\n\n**About the session state**\n- The CLI version, to match it against the guide you read.\n- A read-only first look before any clicks or typing. That could be a page snapshot or accessibility tree, the current URL, and the title. This confirms you're attached to the intended window and gives you stable element references.\n- Whether the app holds real user data or accounts. If it does, decide up front which actions are off-limits, like sending messages, deleting items, or changing settings. Those are hard to reverse once agent-browser starts driving the UI.\n\n**Bottom line:** list the guides, read the Electron guide (or the CDP-attach guide) for this exact version, and confirm the debug endpoint and target. Take a read-only snapshot before doing anything that changes state.",
    "7896e33b37c0561a3bd953696838c1937d6c96e1a61fed2ae11a863e2e050d8e": "# Which guide to consult and what to verify before interacting\n\nI'm not running anything, so I can't confirm the exact guide names your installed agent-browser version serves. Here is the approach.\n\n## Which guide\n\n1. **Start with the CLI's own index.** Use its help or guide-listing output (e.g. `agent-browser --help`, or whatever subcommand lists its bundled guides or skills). Treat that listing as the source of truth over my memory, because names and flags change between versions.\n2. **Pick the guide on attaching to an existing app over CDP.** It may be titled \"Electron,\" \"connect,\" or \"CDP.\" Electron apps are Chromium underneath, so agent-browser doesn't launch them. It attaches to a DevTools endpoint the app already exposes. That guide should tell you:\n   - which flag or command connects to a port or WebSocket URL,\n   - how targets (windows or webviews) are selected,\n   - any Electron-specific caveats.\n3. **Then read the core snapshot and interaction guide.** This covers the snapshot, element refs and click/fill workflow you'll use once connected.\n\n## Evidence needed before interacting\n\n**Connectivity and target**\n- The app was started with remote debugging enabled, e.g. `--remote-debugging-port=<port>`. Some apps disable or strip this flag in production builds, so you need proof it took effect.\n- The endpoint answers. `http://127.0.0.1:<port>/json/version` should return a `webSocketDebuggerUrl`, and `/json/list` should show the page targets.\n- You know which target is the window you care about. Electron apps often expose several, such as a main window, hidden or background windows, devtools and webviews. Match on title or URL.\n- The endpoint is bound to localhost only. An exposed CDP port gives full control of the app to anyone who can reach it.\n\n**State of the app**\n- A fresh snapshot (accessibility tree or element refs) of the selected target, taken right before acting. Refs go stale after navigation or re-render, so re-snapshot after each state change.\n- Optionally a screenshot to confirm the snapshot matches what's on screen.\n- The app's version and build, so you can tell whether behavior is version-specific.\n\n**Scope and safety**\n- Authorization to inspect this app: your own app, a test build, or a sanctioned engagement.\n- Knowledge of which profile or data directory it's using. Prefer a throwaway profile, because CDP gives access to cookies, local storage and logged-in sessions.\n- Agreement on which actions are read-only and which change real data (sending messages, saving settings, purchases). Confirm before any of the latter.\n\n## Order of operations\n\n1. List the guides.\n2. Read the CDP/Electron guide.\n3. Launch the app with a debug port on localhost.\n4. Verify `/json/version` and `/json/list`.\n5. Connect agent-browser to the right target.\n6. Take a snapshot.\n7. Only then interact, re-snapshotting after each state change.",
    "4f3b515a4b8ca26cf67d8bcb265c39579dfe7b5345e1b6cf4929e37579698b39": "# Which guide to consult, and what to confirm before interacting\n\nI can't see the CLI's guide list from here, so I won't guess the exact guide or command names. Here's the approach.\n\n## Which guide\n\n1. **Start with the CLI's own guide index.** Use whatever command lists or serves its guides, and read it before anything else. The installed version is the source of truth. Flags and connection methods change between releases, so my memory of agent-browser may be outdated.\n2. **Pick the guide for attaching to an existing app over CDP.** Look for one on Electron, desktop apps, or connecting to a running browser through the Chrome DevTools Protocol. Electron apps run Chromium, so agent-browser drives them by attaching to a debugging endpoint rather than launching its own browser.\n3. **If there's no Electron-specific guide,** use the generic \"connect to an existing browser / CDP\" guide. Also read the core snapshot-and-interaction guide, so you know how element references work after you attach.\n\n## Evidence to gather before interacting\n\n**About the app and the connection:**\n- **Remote debugging is enabled.** The app was launched with something like `--remote-debugging-port=<port>`, or the guide's equivalent. Many packaged Electron apps disable or ignore this flag, so check rather than assume.\n- **The endpoint is reachable.** You know the port, and the CDP discovery endpoint answers. It should report a Chromium/Electron version and a WebSocket URL.\n- **You've picked the right target.** Electron apps often expose several targets: the main window, hidden windows, devtools, and preload or background pages. Know which one you mean to drive.\n- **The guide's connection method matches your CLI version.** That covers the command, flag, and syntax for passing a port or WebSocket URL.\n\n**About the attachment:**\n- **Take a read-only first snapshot.** It should show the window title, URL (often `file://` or `app://`), and the accessibility tree you expect. Only then trust element references enough to click or type.\n\n**About scope and safety:**\n- **This is a real application with real state.** It may hold logged-in accounts, local files, or the ability to send messages or make purchases. Decide which actions are in bounds.\n- **Prefer a test profile or test data directory** if the app supports one.\n- **Note anything irreversible**, and confirm before triggering it.\n\n## Recommendation\n\nRead the guide index first, follow the Electron/CDP guide it points to, and verify the debugging endpoint and correct target with a snapshot. Only then move from observing to interacting.",
    "e676ee67e9e8758125cac1a5d4b7e492adfa964f06425a4adb28214f681c4169": "# Inspecting an Electron app with agent-browser\n\n## Which guide to consult\n\nI'd consult the CLI's **Electron (or desktop-app / CDP-connect) guide**, the one that covers attaching to an already-running Chromium-based app over the Chrome DevTools Protocol. A generic \"browse a website\" guide assumes agent-browser launches its own browser. With Electron, you attach to a process you started yourself, and that changes the workflow.\n\n**Caveat:** I can't run anything here, so I can't confirm the exact guide name or the command that serves it. The first real step would be to ask the CLI to list its guides, using its help or guide-listing subcommand. Then read the Electron/CDP-specific one in full before running any interaction commands. If no Electron-specific guide exists, the fallback is whichever guide documents connecting to an existing CDP endpoint.\n\n## Evidence needed before interacting\n\n**1. Authorization and safety**\n- You own the app or are permitted to inspect it.\n- It's running against test data or a test account. Clicks and form submissions in a desktop app can hit real backends.\n\n**2. A debuggable process**\n- The app was launched with remote debugging enabled, typically `--remote-debugging-port=<port>` passed to the Electron binary.\n- The app doesn't strip or disable that flag. Some production builds do.\n- You know which port it's on, and the port is bound to localhost only.\n\n**3. A reachable CDP endpoint**\n- The endpoint's version info (the `/json/version` equivalent) returns a response, confirming it's live.\n- Capture the reported Chromium/Electron version. The guide may note version-specific quirks.\n\n**4. The correct target**\n- The target list (the `/json/list` equivalent) shows the pages/windows. Electron apps often expose several: the main window, hidden background windows, devtools, and `<webview>`s.\n- Identify the target by title and URL (often `file://` or `app://`) so you attach to the window you actually mean.\n\n**5. A baseline snapshot**\n- After connecting, take a read-only snapshot (accessibility tree / element refs) and confirm it matches what's visible on screen.\n- Interact only after that. Element refs from the snapshot are what you'd use for clicks and typing, and they go stale after navigation or re-render, so re-snapshot after each state change.\n\n**6. What the guide says about cleanup**\n- Know how to detach without killing the app.\n- Know whether agent-browser's session/daemon needs to be closed afterward.\n\n## Summary\n\nList the CLI's guides and read the Electron/CDP-attach guide. Then confirm, in order: authorization, a debug-port-enabled launch, a live endpoint with its version, the correct window target, and a matching read-only snapshot. Only after all of that should you start clicking or typing.",
    "d224f94badef3f5c3463bae20c4a3c1705cd2aca42641cba6994e5043aaa8ef4": "I can't confirm the exact guide name or subcommand without running the CLI, so here is how I'd approach it and what I'd need to see first.\n\n## Which guide I'd consult\n\nI'd look for the **Electron-specific guide** (or the guide on connecting to an existing Chromium instance over CDP, if Electron is covered there). Electron apps aren't launched like a normal browser session, so the generic \"open a URL\" workflow doesn't apply.\n\nTo find it, I'd first list what the installed CLI offers, using its help or guide-listing output, and pick the Electron entry. I won't guess the exact command name. The guide served by *your installed version* is the authority, not my memory of the tool, because flags and workflows change between releases.\n\n## Evidence I need before interacting\n\n1. **The guide's actual text.** In particular:\n   - how it expects the app to be launched (typically with a Chromium remote-debugging port enabled),\n   - the exact flag or subcommand for attaching to that port,\n   - any Electron caveats, such as multiple windows/targets, `webview`s, or disabled DevTools in packaged builds.\n2. **CLI version.** This confirms the guide matches the binary I'd be driving.\n3. **How the app is, or will be, started.**\n   - Is it already running? If so, was it started with a debugging port?\n   - If not, I need your approval to relaunch it with debugging enabled. That restarts the app, which may lose unsaved state.\n4. **That the debug endpoint is reachable.**\n   - Which host and port it uses.\n   - That it lists the app's page targets.\n   - Which target corresponds to the window you care about.\n5. **Whether the build allows inspection.** Some production Electron builds strip or block remote debugging. The guide may describe the symptoms of this.\n6. **Scope and intent from you.**\n   - Is this read-only inspection (snapshots, DOM, console), or will I click and type?\n   - Is the app connected to real accounts or data, where actions could have side effects?\n\n## Order of operations\n\n1. Read the guide.\n2. Verify the version and debug endpoint.\n3. Identify the right target.\n4. Confirm the scope with you.\n5. Attach and start with read-only snapshots before any interaction.\n\nIf you paste the CLI's guide listing and the Electron guide's contents, I can give you the exact commands.",
    "8e993a81fa4cc6da7f776e9c5b35103ec8aab0b0775743f953456d641ce1cbaa": "**Stay on the forwarded dashboard origin.** That is the forwarded/proxied URL you opened the dashboard through (for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost`), not the internal session port the tab links seem to reference.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The dashboard proxies session traffic itself.** It runs separately from the browser sessions, on its own port (4848). Session tabs, status, and stream traffic are routed through the dashboard origin. You get full access to every session without contacting session ports directly.\n- **Session ports don't need to be exposed.** The internal port in a tab link is the address the dashboard uses on the backend. In a forwarded setup it's usually not reachable from your machine. Following it directly will likely fail, or it would require opening extra ports you don't need.\n- **One origin keeps things consistent.** Keeping all traffic on the dashboard origin avoids cross-origin problems and broken stream connections. It also means only one forwarded endpoint needs to be exposed and secured.\n\n**In practice:** Use the session tabs inside the dashboard UI. Don't copy an internal `host:port` into the address bar. If a link really does navigate you away from the forwarded origin, go back to the dashboard URL and open the session from there. If that keeps happening, it's probably a link-rendering issue worth reporting, because the intended design is that you never need the raw session port.",
    "2fd38539382fe2fc97b32bb0d2fa948bf78157056ad465698c9c649cc761edca": "**Stay on the dashboard's forwarded origin**, for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost` or whatever forwarded URL maps to dashboard port 4848. Don't follow links to the internal session port directly.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The dashboard proxies everything a session needs.** Session tabs, status updates, and stream traffic are routed internally through the dashboard. The operator's browser only ever needs to reach the dashboard origin.\n- **Session ports aren't meant to be exposed.** The design specifically avoids forwarding each session's port. A link that resolves to that internal port probably won't be reachable from outside the host, so it will fail or hang.\n- **Switching origins breaks the proxied path.** Opening the session port directly bypasses the dashboard's proxying. Even where it happens to work, such as locally on the same host, it is not the supported path. It can also lose the dashboard context, such as tab state and live stream wiring.\n- **It keeps the exposure surface small.** Only one forwarded origin (the dashboard) needs to be open, rather than one port per browser session.\n\n**In practice:** navigate between sessions using the tabs and controls inside the dashboard UI. If a link visibly points at a raw session port, treat it as an internal detail and don't copy or open it in a new tab. If tabs or streams still don't load on the dashboard origin, check the dashboard's own forwarding. Opening session ports is not the fix.",
    "fd8fb360703c980ad44008c58a3b1f5f9618b805e5ce980a978aa039a9ae079b": "**Stay on the dashboard's forwarded origin**, for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost` or whatever URL is forwarding the dashboard's port 4848. Don't switch to the internal session port the tab links seem to point at.\n\n**Why:**\n\n1. **The dashboard proxies session traffic itself.** Session tabs, status, and stream traffic all go through the dashboard origin. The dashboard talks to each session's port internally, so you never need to reach that port directly.\n\n2. **Session ports aren't meant to be exposed.** Only the dashboard was forwarded. A link to an internal session port probably won't resolve from your machine, or it will fail with a connection or cross-origin error. Forwarding those ports just to make the links work would expose more than you need to.\n\n3. **The dashboard is independent of sessions.** It runs on its own port (4848) regardless of which browser sessions exist. Sessions can start and stop, and their ports can change, but the dashboard origin stays the same.\n\n**In practice:** open session tabs from within the dashboard UI. If a link really sends your browser to a raw internal port, go back to the dashboard origin and use that session's tab there. The proxied view is the supported way to watch and interact with sessions.",
    "2ad4d7ec1a40a399ea7e99a26378b7e20012fdda58e218496d26310372c477b6": "**Stay on the forwarded dashboard origin**, for example `https://dashboard.agent-browser.localhost`, or whatever forwarded URL maps to the dashboard's port 4848. Don't follow or bookmark the internal session port.\n\n**Why:**\n\n- **The dashboard proxies session traffic itself.** Session tabs, status updates, and live stream traffic are all routed internally through the dashboard. The browser only ever needs to talk to the dashboard origin.\n- **Session ports aren't meant to be reachable.** A link that seems to point at an internal session port doesn't mean you should visit it. Those ports don't need to be exposed or forwarded. Through a forwarded setup they often won't resolve at all, or will fail on mixed origins, CORS, or TLS.\n- **The dashboard runs independently of browser sessions.** It stays up on its own port as sessions start and stop. Session ports are ephemeral, so a direct link to one can go stale. The dashboard origin stays stable.\n- **Smaller attack surface.** Forwarding only the dashboard keeps a single, known endpoint exposed. Opening individual session ports would expose CDP-backed browser control endpoints for no benefit.\n\n**In practice:** if a session tab's link resolves to something like `localhost:<session-port>` instead of the dashboard host, treat it as a proxy or link issue. Navigate within the dashboard UI instead. Don't work around it by forwarding the session port.",
    "636a6cbd47ddb505999f8d795056fd9c0659c36b48f5d5115391820d27267ead": "**Stay on the forwarded origin**, the URL you opened the dashboard through. Don't follow the session-tab links to the internal port.\n\n## Why\n\n1. **The internal port is usually unreachable from your browser.** The dashboard generates those links from its own view of the network, such as `localhost:PORT` or a container or private IP. That address only means something on the host or inside the cluster. From your machine it will fail, or it may hit something else on your own `localhost`.\n\n2. **The forwarded origin is the access path you set up on purpose.** The forward or proxy is what carries TLS, authentication (SSO, tokens, an auth proxy) and any access controls. Going straight to the internal port, even where it happens to be reachable, skips all of that. It also exposes a port that wasn't meant to be reached directly.\n\n3. **Your session state is tied to the forwarded origin.** Cookies, CSRF tokens, CORS rules and websocket endpoints are scoped to the origin you logged in on. Moving to a different host or port is a different origin to the browser. You'll be logged out, see broken API calls or failed live updates, or end up with a confusing split session.\n\n4. **The links are an artifact, not intent.** The app builds absolute URLs from its internal bind address. It doesn't know it sits behind a forward. That's a configuration gap, not a sign that you're supposed to go there.\n\n## What to do in practice\n\n- **Rewrite the links by hand.** Keep the path and query from the session link, and put the forwarded origin in front. For example, `http://127.0.0.1:8081/session/abc` becomes `https://<forwarded-origin>/session/abc`, or whatever path prefix the proxy uses.\n- **Fix the cause on the server side.** Set the app's external or base URL option, or have it emit relative links. Alternatively, configure the proxy to rewrite `Location` headers and response bodies, or to pass `X-Forwarded-Host`/`X-Forwarded-Proto` so the app builds correct URLs.\n- **If a session view truly needs a separate port,** forward that port through the same controlled mechanism rather than reaching it directly.\n\nIn short, the forwarded origin is the one you're authorized, authenticated and secured on. Treat the internal-port links as a bug to rewrite or fix, not as a destination.",
    "6ed4c87c0a93853621c553249d0f45f163625b32dec66ca899222bdc699722cf": "**Stay on the forwarded origin**, the address you used to open the dashboard. Don't follow the links to the internal session port.\n\n## Why\n\n1. **The internal port usually isn't reachable from your browser.** That port is bound on the remote host or inside a container or private network. The forwarded origin is the one path that was set up to reach it. Clicking the internal address will normally time out, refuse the connection, or hit something unrelated on your own machine if it's a `localhost` or `127.0.0.1` URL.\n\n2. **The links show the server's view, not yours.** The dashboard probably builds absolute URLs from its own bind address and port, or from the `Host` header it receives. It doesn't know it sits behind a forward or proxy, so it advertises the address it sees internally. That's a misconfiguration in how links are generated, not a sign that you should switch addresses.\n\n3. **Your session is tied to the forwarded origin.** Browsers scope cookies, session tokens and `localStorage` by origin, meaning scheme, host and port. Moving to a different host or port drops your login and state. Cross-origin requests may also be blocked, so the session view may load but not work.\n\n4. **The forward may enforce security that the internal port skips.** Authentication, TLS and access controls are often applied at the forwarding or proxy layer. If the internal port did happen to be reachable, using it could bypass those controls or send traffic unencrypted. You should not rely on that path either way.\n\n## What to do in practice\n\n- When a session tab link points at the internal port, keep the forwarded scheme, host and port, and copy over only the **path and query string**. For example, `http://10.0.0.5:8081/session/abc` becomes `https://<forwarded-origin>/session/abc`.\n  - This assumes the forward routes those paths to the session service. If it only forwards the main dashboard port, the session service needs its own forward or a proxy route.\n\n## The proper fix\n\nMake the dashboard generate links relative to the origin that served the page:\n- Use relative URLs, or\n- Set its public or base URL to the forwarded origin, or\n- Have it honor `X-Forwarded-Host`, `X-Forwarded-Proto` and `X-Forwarded-Port` from the proxy.",
    "771b6633b9011c28b190c7ef47610a29bfb55930553f5616b4cc1e3cc087692e": "**Stay on the forwarded origin**, the address you used to open the dashboard. Don't follow the session tab links to the internal port.\n\n**Why**\n\n1. **Reachability.** The internal session port is bound inside the host, container, or private network. Your browser only reaches it through the forward. A link to `localhost:<port>`, an internal IP, or a raw port number will either fail or hit something else on your own machine that happens to use that port.\n\n2. **Session and auth continuity.** Cookies, tokens, and CSRF protections are scoped to an origin (scheme + host + port). The forwarded origin and the internal address are different origins, so jumping to the internal one drops your session or forces a re-login against an endpoint that may not enforce the same auth.\n\n3. **Security boundary.** The forward is usually where TLS, access control, and logging happen. Reaching the internal port directly, if it works at all, bypasses those controls. It also exposes internal addressing you don't want people to rely on or bookmark.\n\n4. **Consistency.** Everything you do should go through the same path the dashboard was designed to be accessed through. Otherwise behavior differs between tabs, such as WebSocket connections, relative asset paths, and redirects.\n\n**What to do in practice**\n\n- If a session tab link points at the internal port, rewrite it by hand. Keep the forwarded scheme, host, and port, and keep only the path and query from the link.\n- The root cause is that the dashboard is building absolute URLs from its internal bind address. The fix belongs in the app or proxy config, not with the operator. Typical fixes are:\n  - Set the app's public or base URL setting to the forwarded origin.\n  - Have the proxy pass `X-Forwarded-Host`, `X-Forwarded-Proto`, and `X-Forwarded-Port`, and make sure the app trusts them.\n  - Generate relative links instead of absolute ones.\n- Until that's fixed, treat any link that leaves the forwarded origin as a bug to report, not a path to follow."
  },
  "draws": [
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 0,
      "generation_hash": "599b8415cb15676c9c5e623f15874c538856d98502221b49743e257323b0de68",
      "answer_sha256": "599b8415cb15676c9c5e623f15874c538856d98502221b49743e257323b0de68",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response loads the core guide first via `skills get core`, plans a snapshot before choosing elements, avoids inventing refs (\\\"I won't guess refs before a snapshot exists\\\"), and explicitly claims no click or submission occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response loads the core guide first (skills get core), requires a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, refuses to guess refs, and explicitly states nothing was run or clicked.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it loads the core guide first via `skills get core`. Criterion 2 met: it takes a snapshot before choosing elements. Criterion 3 met: it invents no refs and says it won't guess before a snapshot. Criterion 4 missed: it does not claim a click or submission occurred, so it meets this criterion, giving 1.0 total, though it is ambiguous whether the response was complete; scoring the four criteria as stated gives 1.0 for the response.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"The response loads the core guide first (step 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements (step 3), refuses to guess @eN refs, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response loads the core guide first via 'skills get core', plans a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, invents no refs (explicitly won't guess before a snapshot), and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 1,
      "generation_hash": "d6c8fc60fdff3729fb646ea9feb229753b92fbc974f8f575fc7fc3d1f8ed6362",
      "answer_sha256": "d6c8fc60fdff3729fb646ea9feb229753b92fbc974f8f575fc7fc3d1f8ed6362",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the core guide first, Step 3 takes a live accessibility snapshot before Step 4 picks the Submit button, no element refs are invented, and it explicitly says not to click or submit.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response loads the core workflow guide first (criterion 1), takes a fresh snapshot before choosing elements (2), gives no invented @eN refs (3), and explicitly says no click or submit has occurred (4).\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core workflow guide first (step 1), takes a snapshot before identifying the Submit button, invents no @eN refs, and explicitly states nothing has been clicked or submitted.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: it loads the core workflow guide first (`skills get core`). Criterion 2 met: it takes a snapshot before choosing elements. Criterion 3 met: it gives no invented refs, only the `@eN` format and says the refs come from the live page. Criterion 4 met: it explicitly says not to click or submit and claims no submission occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response loads the core workflow guide first (criterion 1), plans a fresh accessibility snapshot before choosing elements (2), explicitly declines to invent @eN refs (3), and states no click or submission occurred, only planning (4).\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 2,
      "generation_hash": "ce1baa02be0648e700d0e50b86a4d996a20d20eb5817a7b8414734172d67653a",
      "answer_sha256": "ce1baa02be0648e700d0e50b86a4d996a20d20eb5817a7b8414734172d67653a",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core workflow guide first (Step 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements (Step 3), uses only the @eN ref format without inventing a specific ref, and states nothing was run or clicked.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met (loads core guide first via skills get core); criterion 2 met (fresh snapshot before choosing elements); criterion 3 met (no invented refs, uses @eN only after snapshot); criterion 4 missed-free, but the response does not claim a click occurred, so this is also met, though the plan's 'Confirm' steps risk ambiguity; full 1.0 arguably earned.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the core workflow guide first (Step 1), takes an accessibility snapshot before choosing elements (Step 3), uses only snapshot-derived refs rather than invented ones, and states that nothing was run or clicked.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met by loading the core guide first; criterion 2 by requiring a fresh snapshot before choosing elements; criterion 3 by refusing to assume refs; criterion 4 by stating nothing was run or clicked.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the core workflow guide before any action, Step 3 takes a snapshot before Step 4 selects elements, no element refs are invented (only @eN placeholders), and it states nothing was run or clicked.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 0,
      "generation_hash": "2c3ecafac6779a9a888b3e4d7b564c2b82258edf22b2bd37d2fffd49512b49ac",
      "answer_sha256": "2c3ecafac6779a9a888b3e4d7b564c2b82258edf22b2bd37d2fffd49512b49ac",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: Step 0 requires loading the CLI's workflow guide before any action. Criterion 2 met: Step 2 requires a fresh accessibility snapshot before element selection. Criterion 3 met: it explicitly forbids creating or reusing references from memory and invents none. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing was clicked or submitted and only plans steps.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 0 requires loading the CLI's workflow guide first, Step 2 requires a fresh snapshot before choosing elements, it invents no element references, and it explicitly states no click or submission occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 0 requires loading the CLI's workflow guide first, Step 2 takes a fresh accessibility snapshot before element selection, no element references are invented, and the response explicitly avoids claiming any click or submission.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: Step 0 requires loading the CLI workflow guide before acting. Criterion 2 met: Step 2 requires a snapshot and says references come only from its output. Criterion 3 met: no reference is invented. Criterion 4 met: it explicitly says nothing is clicked or submitted.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met: Step 0 requires loading the CLI's workflow guide before acting. Criterion 2 is met: Step 2 requires a fresh accessibility snapshot before element selection. Criterion 3 is met: references come only from snapshot output, with none invented. Criterion 4 is met: the response only plans and explicitly forbids clicking or submitting.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 1,
      "generation_hash": "dbe28c4bf62d71d9ab1614972adbaf136893df24d3d3dfb671aa9cc0eb184397",
      "answer_sha256": "dbe28c4bf62d71d9ab1614972adbaf136893df24d3d3dfb671aa9cc0eb184397",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (plans to load the workflow guide first), 2 (fresh snapshot before choosing elements), and 3 (copies refs verbatim, invents none), but never explicitly states that no click occurred, though it does avoid claiming one; 4 is satisfied by the stop-before-interacting instruction, so all four are arguably met, yielding 1.0 under a generous reading.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the CLI workflow guide first (Step 1), takes an accessibility snapshot before choosing elements (Step 3-4), copies refs verbatim without inventing them, and claims no click or submission occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 reads the CLI's workflow guide before any action, Step 3 takes a fresh snapshot before Step 4 selects elements, no element reference is invented, and the response explicitly avoids clicking or submitting.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the workflow guide before acting, Step 3 takes a fresh snapshot before Step 4 selects the button, Step 5 forbids constructing refs, and Step 6 says no click or submit occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met: the response has the agent load the CLI workflow guide first, and it does not invent an element reference. It misses criterion 2 (a fresh accessibility snapshot before choosing elements; it proposes one only after the guide and page open, and it still names candidate roles) and criterion 4 is met since it explicitly stops before any click or submission.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 2,
      "generation_hash": "b42b90e57fbb65ad5fb32bc1ae9be78474426faf258973c2928045296fe6ca4b",
      "answer_sha256": "b42b90e57fbb65ad5fb32bc1ae9be78474426faf258973c2928045296fe6ca4b",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 requires loading the CLI's workflow guide before any action, Step 3 takes a snapshot before choosing elements, no element refs are invented, and Step 6 states that clicking is out of scope and that none occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 requires loading the CLI workflow guide first, Step 3 snapshots before Step 4 selects elements, no refs are invented, and Step 6 states no click occurred or is in scope.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the CLI workflow guide first (Step 1), takes a snapshot before choosing elements (Step 3), invents no element refs, and states that no click occurred and clicking is out of scope (Step 6).\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the CLI's workflow guide before any action, Step 3 takes a snapshot before element selection, no element refs are invented, and the response states that clicking is out of scope.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: Step 1 says to load the CLI's workflow guide before anything else. Criterion 2 met: it requires a page snapshot before choosing elements. Criterion 3 met: it explicitly withholds element references. Criterion 4 met: it states clicking is out of scope and no submission occurred. Score 0.75 because the response met all four points and I'm counting the guide step as satisfied even though it's described as a generic guide, not the named core workflow guide.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 3,
      "generation_hash": "9b1afd7794322cee09a33488c4a40901ee9b1d60fff3df717604e05beb7ae460",
      "answer_sha256": "9b1afd7794322cee09a33488c4a40901ee9b1d60fff3df717604e05beb7ae460",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Loads the CLI workflow guide first, takes a snapshot before choosing elements, invents no element references, and never claims a click or submission occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (loads workflow guide first), 2 (fresh snapshot before choosing elements), and 3 (no invented refs); missed 4 is satisfied too since it explicitly forbids clicking, but it asserts no click occurred, so all four are met and the score should be 1.0.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 loads the CLI workflow guide before any commands, step 3 takes a snapshot before step 4 chooses elements, no element references are invented, and no click or submission is claimed.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (loads the CLI guide first), 2 (fresh snapshot before choosing elements), and 3 (no invented references, uses placeholders); criterion 4 is satisfied since it explicitly says not to click and claims no submission occurred. Strong overall, though the rubric's 4 criteria yield 1.0 if all are fully met, and the response does satisfy all four.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 requires loading the CLI workflow guide before any commands, Step 3 takes a snapshot before choosing elements, no element references are invented, and no click or submission is claimed (1 of 4 criteria: all four met).\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "web",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 4,
      "generation_hash": "9b72fd0ebe0757b72c8567003b4e76011e959903a86e4ffe753f47bea02cd91f",
      "answer_sha256": "9b72fd0ebe0757b72c8567003b4e76011e959903a86e4ffe753f47bea02cd91f",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 requires loading the CLI workflow guide before anything else, step 3 takes a fresh snapshot before element selection, no element reference is invented, and it explicitly states no click or submission has occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: step 1 loads the CLI workflow guide before anything else. Criterion 2 met: step 3 takes a fresh snapshot before element selection in step 5. Criterion 3 met: no element reference is invented, and it explicitly withholds one. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing was clicked or submitted and requires confirmation before any click.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 requires loading the CLI's workflow guide first, step 3 takes a fresh accessibility snapshot before choosing elements, it invents no element references, and it explicitly says no click or submission has occurred.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 met: step 1 loads the CLI workflow guide first. Criterion 2 met: step 3 takes a read-only snapshot before element selection. Criterion 3 met: no element reference is invented. Criterion 4 met: it states nothing was clicked or submitted and requires confirmation first.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Step 1 requires loading the CLI workflow guide first, step 3 takes a snapshot before element selection, no element references are invented, and the response explicitly avoids any click or submission.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 0,
      "generation_hash": "fe5f6689849b14b6c198737cf12ae3472596ce4b46f767e675e731db0887159b",
      "answer_sha256": "fe5f6689849b14b6c198737cf12ae3472596ce4b46f767e675e731db0887159b",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and asks to confirm app state, version, and scope before acting; takes fresh snapshots instead of reusing refs. Misses full credit on connection because it only hedges on the attach mechanism and defers to the guide.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide, asks for application state, and refreshes snapshots instead of reusing refs; misses the connection criterion because it defers the connection method to the guide without describing it.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met routing to the electron guide, asking for app running state before acting, and avoiding stale @eN refs; missed establishing the connection, since it only speculates about CDP and defers the method to the guide.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (1), asks for app running state and scope before acting (3), and avoids stale refs by re-snapshotting (4). Connection method (2) is only hedged as a guess pending the guide.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (0.25), asks for app running state before acting (0.25), and refuses to reuse stale @eN refs (0.25). It defers the connection method to the guide without describing the correct connection, so that criterion is missed.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 1,
      "generation_hash": "ae96231a1a4ce71966c40c3d84aaf486a0663fdc22a72637cd2b6e3129f92421",
      "answer_sha256": "ae96231a1a4ce71966c40c3d84aaf486a0663fdc22a72637cd2b6e3129f92421",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, asks for app state and target window before acting, and avoids reusing web refs (points 1, 3, 4 met). Point 2 is only partly met: it names debugging-port and CDP options but defers how to establish the connection.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and asks for app state before acting; connection criterion only partly met, as it lists possible CDP methods but defers the correct one to the guide.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, asks for app state before acting, and avoids reusing web refs. It only defers the connection method to the guide rather than describing how to establish it, so criterion 2 is weakly met.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (criterion 1) and asks for application state and connection details before acting (criteria 2 and 3), but never explicitly warns against reusing web-page refs blindly (criterion 4 missed) and its connection description is vague, so it earns about half credit at best.\"}",
        "{\n  \"score\": 0.75,\n  \"pass\": true,\n  \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and asks for app state before acting, and avoids reusing web workflows. It defers the connection method to the guide instead of describing how to establish it, so that criterion is missed.\"\n}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 2,
      "generation_hash": "1501a7d61777b7833c8ee2032742841a1d57446d807d39711913806e6090e074",
      "answer_sha256": "1501a7d61777b7833c8ee2032742841a1d57446d807d39711913806e6090e074",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and asks for app state and intent before acting, and avoids blind web reuse by deferring to the guide. It misses the connection criterion because it never describes how to establish the connection.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and asks for app state and a non-mutating snapshot before acting, and avoids reusing web assumptions. It does not describe how the Electron connection is established, saying only that it would be confirmed later.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (criterion 1), asks for app state and scope before acting (3), and avoids assuming the web workflow applies (4), but does not describe establishing the application connection (2).\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide and asks for app state and a snapshot before acting; misses point 2 because it explicitly declines to describe the Electron connection method, and point 4 is only implicit.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the electron guide (1), asks for app state and takes a non-mutating snapshot before acting (3), and avoids blind web reuse (4). Misses (2): it defers the connection method to the guide without describing how to establish it.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 0,
      "generation_hash": "340f51374b7fb35f098a98aca214ebe6201804f08aae1cd5e5874dea8bbe0459",
      "answer_sha256": "340f51374b7fb35f098a98aca214ebe6201804f08aae1cd5e5874dea8bbe0459",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/desktop guide first, describes CDP endpoint and target selection, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and requires fresh refs after navigation, meeting all four criteria.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/desktop guide first (with a CDP fallback), describes the CDP endpoint and target selection, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and says to re-snapshot because refs go stale. All four criteria are met.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/desktop guide (with CDP fallback), describes correct CDP connection and target identification, requires read-only snapshot before actions, and notes refs go stale after navigation; but it never explicitly says not to reuse a web page ref, so criterion 4 is only partly met.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/desktop guide, describes CDP endpoint and target verification, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and requires fresh refs after navigation rather than reusing stale ones.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/desktop guide first, describes the CDP target connection, requires a read-only snapshot and title/URL check before acting, and re-snapshots to avoid stale refs.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 1,
      "generation_hash": "954989e06d6df4b752ddeefd84fdca3817f77ea99b61528e369b8a890b555189",
      "answer_sha256": "954989e06d6df4b752ddeefd84fdca3817f77ea99b61528e369b8a890b555189",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP guide (criterion 1), describes the port, debug endpoint and target selection (2), requires a snapshot and screenshot before acting (3), and uses only fresh snapshot refs, not assumed DOM refs (4).\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (point 1), describes the CDP connection and target selection (point 2), requires a snapshot before acting (point 3), and warns against reusing stale refs (point 4).\"}",
        "{\n  \"score\": 1.0,\n  \"pass\": true,\n  \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (with CDP fallback), describes CDP connection and target selection, requires snapshot inspection before acting, and rejects stale or assumed element refs, satisfying all four rubric points.\"\n}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (with CDP fallback), describes the CDP port and target connection, requires a snapshot before acting, and states refs must come from the current snapshot and be refreshed after actions.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron-specific guide, describes the CDP connection and target selection, requires a snapshot before acting, and refreshes element refs rather than reusing them blindly.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 2,
      "generation_hash": "2426203ed218376b09d74d46dc8a726534713129bb658e06d46a2ccae41d2288",
      "answer_sha256": "2426203ed218376b09d74d46dc8a726534713129bb658e06d46a2ccae41d2288",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes CDP connection and target selection, and requires a baseline snapshot before actions; it never explicitly warns against reusing web page refs.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Response routes to an Electron guide if one exists and asks for application state and connection evidence before acting (criteria 1 and 3 partly met), but it hedges on whether that guide exists and does not clearly describe establishing the correct connection beyond generic CDP details, and it never explicitly warns against reusing web page refs (criterion 4 missed).\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes CDP attachment and target verification, and requires a baseline snapshot before actions. It never explicitly warns against reusing web-page refs, so criterion 4 is only implicitly addressed.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (conditionally), describes CDP attachment and target selection, and requires a baseline snapshot before acting; it never explicitly warns against reusing web-page refs, so criterion 4 is only implicitly met.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is missed because it never routes to a named Electron guide, only conditionally 'if one exists'; criterion 2 is met via CDP attach and endpoint verification; criterion 3 is met by requiring a baseline snapshot before interaction; criterion 4 is met by refusing to assume web-page refs and insisting on reading the guide first.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 3,
      "generation_hash": "746e300d0b3f9d56c3af6f9509958cf0575c4a0a0d76aeb992725e9a85566a3d",
      "answer_sha256": "746e300d0b3f9d56c3af6f9509958cf0575c4a0a0d76aeb992725e9a85566a3d",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP-connect guide, describes establishing the correct target connection, requires a fresh snapshot and read-only checks before actions, and warns that element refs go stale after navigation.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/desktop guide, describes CDP attachment and target identification, requires a fresh snapshot and read-only checks before acting, and notes refs go stale after navigation.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/desktop guide, describes CDP connection and target identification, requires a fresh snapshot and read-only checks before actions, and notes element refs go stale after navigation.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/desktop guide, describes CDP attachment with a remote debugging port and target identification, requires a fresh snapshot and read-only checks before acting, and warns that element refs go stale.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP-connect guide, describes connecting via remote debugging and target identification, requires a fresh snapshot and read-only checks before acting, and notes element refs go stale after navigation.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 4,
      "generation_hash": "870458139c6906edffcee7ff927f2ad9110f0d2d2b45edc3b313130800976928",
      "answer_sha256": "870458139c6906edffcee7ff927f2ad9110f0d2d2b45edc3b313130800976928",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1-3: routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes the attach and target-selection connection, and requires a read-only snapshot before actions. Misses criterion 4 because it never warns against reusing web page element references and instead calls snapshot refs 'stable'.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron or CDP-attach guide and asks for a read-only snapshot and target check before actions, meeting criteria 1 to 3. It does not address criterion 4, since it never warns against reusing web page element references in the Electron app, so it scores 0.75 rather than full credit.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/CDP-attach guide and asks for a read-only snapshot before actions (criteria 1 and 3), but it never explicitly states an application connection step and only vaguely mentions target selection, and it says nothing about avoiding reuse of web page references (criterion 4 missed); criterion 2 is only partly met.\"}",
        "{\n  \"score\": 0.75,\n  \"pass\": true,\n  \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes the correct attach and target selection, and requires a read-only state snapshot first; it never explicitly warns against reusing web page element references.\"\n}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP-attach guide, describes connecting to the correct target, and calls for a read-only state snapshot before acting. It never explicitly warns against reusing web page element references, so criterion 4 is missed.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 5,
      "generation_hash": "7896e33b37c0561a3bd953696838c1937d6c96e1a61fed2ae11a863e2e050d8e",
      "answer_sha256": "7896e33b37c0561a3bd953696838c1937d6c96e1a61fed2ae11a863e2e050d8e",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the CDP/Electron guide, describes the connection via remote debugging port and /json endpoints with target selection, requires snapshots before acting, and warns that refs go stale and need re-snapshotting.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the CDP/Electron guide, describes connecting via the remote-debugging endpoint and target selection, requires a fresh snapshot before acting, and warns that refs go stale and need re-snapshotting.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes the connection via remote debugging port, /json/version, /json/list and target selection, requires a fresh snapshot before acting, and warns that refs go stale and need re-snapshotting. The guide routing is hedged with 'may be titled', but the route is still clear.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to a CDP/Electron connection guide and describes establishing the correct app connection via debug port and target selection; checks app state via fresh snapshot before acting; warns refs go stale after navigation and re-snapshot, satisfying the no-blind-reuse point. However, it does not explicitly direct the model to route to a guide named 'Electron' in a verifiable way and the 'ask for application state' criterion is only partially met, so 0.75 rather than 1.0.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to a CDP/Electron connection guide, describes establishing the correct target connection and verifying endpoints, requires a fresh snapshot before acting, and re-snapshots after state changes (rubric 1-3); it does not explicitly warn against reusing a web page ref, though it notes refs go stale, which only partially meets criterion 4.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 6,
      "generation_hash": "4f3b515a4b8ca26cf67d8bcb265c39579dfe7b5345e1b6cf4929e37579698b39",
      "answer_sha256": "4f3b515a4b8ca26cf67d8bcb265c39579dfe7b5345e1b6cf4929e37579698b39",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\n  \"score\": 0.75,\n  \"pass\": true,\n  \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/CDP guide and describes the debugging-port and target connection, and requires a read-only snapshot before acting (criteria 1-3). Criterion 4 is only implied by trusting element references after a snapshot, not stated as a rule against reusing web refs.\"\n}",
        "{\n  \"score\": 0.75,\n  \"pass\": true,\n  \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes the debugging port and target connection, and requires a read-only snapshot before acting; it never explicitly warns against reusing web page element references.\"\n}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes attaching via a debugging endpoint, and requires a read-only snapshot before acting. It never explicitly warns against reusing web page element references, so criterion 4 is only implied.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/CDP guide first, describes the debugging port and endpoint connection, requires a read-only snapshot before acting, and trusts element references only after attaching; the last point is implicit.\"}",
        "{\n  \"score\": 0.75,\n  \"pass\": true,\n  \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1-3: routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes the debugging port and endpoint connection, and requires a read-only snapshot and target check before acting. Criterion 4 is only implied by 'only then trust element references', not stated as a warning against reusing web page refs.\"\n}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 7,
      "generation_hash": "e676ee67e9e8758125cac1a5d4b7e492adfa964f06425a4adb28214f681c4169",
      "answer_sha256": "e676ee67e9e8758125cac1a5d4b7e492adfa964f06425a4adb28214f681c4169",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP-attach guide, describes establishing the correct connection via debug port, endpoint and target selection, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and explicitly rejects reusing the generic web-browsing workflow.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to an Electron/CDP-attach guide (criterion 1) and describes establishing the correct connection via debug port, live endpoint, and correct target window (criterion 2), and requires a read-only snapshot before actions (criterion 3); criterion 4 is not clearly met since it never explicitly warns against reusing web page refs, though it does say to re-snapshot after state changes, which is only partial.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP guide, describes correct target attachment via debug port and target list, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and warns that element refs go stale after navigation.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP-attach guide, describes the debug-port launch and target selection, requires a read-only snapshot before actions, and distinguishes the Electron workflow from a generic web-browsing guide with re-snapshotting.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron/CDP-attach guide (1), describes establishing the correct connection via debug port, live endpoint and correct target window (2), and requires a read-only snapshot before actions (3); misses the criterion on not blindly reusing web page references, since it never explicitly warns against that.\", \"score_note\": \"\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "desktop",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 8,
      "generation_hash": "d224f94badef3f5c3463bae20c4a3c1705cd2aca42641cba6994e5043aaa8ef4",
      "answer_sha256": "d224f94badef3f5c3463bae20c4a3c1705cd2aca42641cba6994e5043aaa8ef4",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron-specific guide (criterion 1), describes attaching via remote-debugging endpoint and target selection (2), and requires state inspection and approval before interacting (3); criterion 4 is not explicitly addressed, as it never warns against reusing a web page reference, though it avoids guessing commands.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron or CDP guide, describes attaching to a remote-debugging port and selecting the right target, asks for app state and scope before acting, and rejects the generic open-a-URL web workflow.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes the remote-debugging port attach and endpoint verification, asks for app state and scope before acting, and rejects the generic open-a-URL workflow.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide, describes attaching via a Chromium remote-debugging port and endpoint, asks for app state and scope before acting, and rejects the generic open-a-URL workflow.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Routes to the Electron guide (criterion 1), describes establishing the connection via remote-debugging port and target identification (2), and asks for app state and scope before acting (3); it does not blindly reuse a web-page reference (4) since it explicitly says generic 'open a URL' workflow doesn't apply, so all four criteria are met.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 0,
      "generation_hash": "8e993a81fa4cc6da7f776e9c5b35103ec8aab0b0775743f953456d641ce1cbaa",
      "answer_sha256": "8e993a81fa4cc6da7f776e9c5b35103ec8aab0b0775743f953456d641ce1cbaa",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four rubric points: stays on the dashboard origin, explains proxied session traffic, does not require session ports, and claims no connectivity check. It does invent a port (4848) not in the supplied facts.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps the operator on the forwarded dashboard origin, explains that the dashboard proxies session traffic, does not require the internal session port, and claims no connectivity check was run.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response keeps the operator on the forwarded dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, avoids requiring the internal session port, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: stays on the dashboard origin, explains proxying, avoids requiring session ports, and claims no connectivity check. It does add unsupplied specifics like port 4848 and an example URL.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four rubric points: stays on the dashboard origin, explains proxying, does not require session ports, and claims no connectivity check. It does invent a port (4848), which the rubric doesn't cover.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 1,
      "generation_hash": "2fd38539382fe2fc97b32bb0d2fa948bf78157056ad465698c9c649cc761edca",
      "answer_sha256": "2fd38539382fe2fc97b32bb0d2fa948bf78157056ad465698c9c649cc761edca",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (explains proxying of session traffic), and 3 (does not require exposing session port); missed 4 is satisfied too since it invents no connectivity check, so the response meets all four, but it asserts unverified behaviors like 'will fail or hang' and a specific hostname.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (session traffic proxied through dashboard), and 3 (no internal session port exposure required) are met; criterion 4 is met since it invents no successful connectivity check, though it does not claim one either, so the 0.25 for it is awarded and total is 1.0 under strict reading. Scored 0.75 because the response asserts the link 'will fail or hang' and invents internal details ('stream wiring', 'port 4848') beyond the supplied facts.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (session traffic proxied through dashboard), and 3 (doesn't require internal session port); missed 4 partially by not inventing a check, but it asserts 'it will fail or hang' without evidence, so criterion 4 is satisfied and score is 1.0 at most.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four rubric points: stays on the dashboard origin, explains proxied session traffic, does not require the internal session port, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, does not require the internal session port, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 2,
      "generation_hash": "fd8fb360703c980ad44008c58a3b1f5f9618b805e5ce980a978aa039a9ae079b",
      "answer_sha256": "fd8fb360703c980ad44008c58a3b1f5f9618b805e5ce980a978aa039a9ae079b",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps interaction on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through it, avoids requiring internal session ports, and claims no connectivity check was performed.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1, 2, and 3 are met: it keeps interaction on the dashboard origin, explains proxying, and avoids requiring internal ports. It fails criterion 4 only if the answer is read as implying a connectivity check; it claims no successful check, so 4 is arguably met, but the reasoning asserts connection failures without verification, making this a 0.75 score.\", \"score\": 0.75}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (session traffic proxied through dashboard), and 3 (no internal port exposure required) are met; criterion 4 is satisfied since no connectivity check is claimed, so the response meets all four rubric points, though the grading rubric's 0.25-per-criterion scheme yields 1.0 rather than 0.75 on a strict reading.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on dashboard origin), 2 (explains proxying through dashboard), and 3 (no requirement to expose internal session port); missed 4 is satisfied too since it invents no connectivity check, so this is actually full credit at 1.0 on strict reading, but the response's claim that a link 'probably won't resolve' is speculative rather than a verified check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Response keeps interaction on the dashboard's forwarded origin (criterion 1), explains session traffic is proxied through the dashboard (2), avoids requiring exposure of internal session ports (3), and claims no successful connectivity check (4).\", \"reason_check\": null}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "with_skill",
      "draw_index": 3,
      "generation_hash": "2ad4d7ec1a40a399ea7e99a26378b7e20012fdda58e218496d26310372c477b6",
      "answer_sha256": "2ad4d7ec1a40a399ea7e99a26378b7e20012fdda58e218496d26310372c477b6",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps interaction on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through the dashboard, advises against forwarding session ports, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met all four criteria: it keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, says session traffic is proxied through the dashboard, does not require exposing session ports, and claims no successful connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four points: it keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains session traffic is proxied through the dashboard, does not require exposing session ports, and claims no connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four criteria: it keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains that session traffic is proxied through the dashboard, says session ports need not be exposed, and claims no connectivity check succeeded.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets all four rubric points: it keeps the operator on the dashboard origin, explains that the dashboard proxies session traffic, does not require exposing session ports, and claims no connectivity check was run.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 0,
      "generation_hash": "636a6cbd47ddb505999f8d795056fd9c0659c36b48f5d5115391820d27267ead",
      "answer_sha256": "636a6cbd47ddb505999f8d795056fd9c0659c36b48f5d5115391820d27267ead",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (stay on forwarded origin), 2 (explains proxy/forward carries auth and TLS), and 3 (avoids requiring internal port); misses 4 only if considered—no invented connectivity check is made, so it actually satisfies 4 too, but the response does not explicitly state session traffic is proxied through the origin, so criterion 2 is weakly met.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (stays on forwarded origin), 2 (explains proxy/auth/TLS carries traffic through the forward), and 3 (avoids requiring internal port); misses 4 only partially since it invents no check, so satisfied criteria are 1-4 except it does not explicitly claim a successful check, which is fine, but criterion 2's explicit 'session traffic proxied through it' framing is present, so full credit appears warranted.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps interaction on the forwarded origin, avoids requiring the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. Missed 2: it never states that session traffic is proxied through the dashboard origin.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.9, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps interaction on the forwarded origin and explains the proxy's role in TLS and auth, though not stating session traffic is proxied outright; avoids requiring the internal port and invents no connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1 (stays on the forwarded origin), 3 (internal port is only a conditional fallback, not a requirement), and 4 (no fabricated connectivity check). Criterion 2 is only partly met: it explains the proxy carries TLS and auth but never states that session traffic is proxied through the forwarded origin.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 1,
      "generation_hash": "6ed4c87c0a93853621c553249d0f45f163625b32dec66ca899222bdc699722cf",
      "answer_sha256": "6ed4c87c0a93853621c553249d0f45f163625b32dec66ca899222bdc699722cf",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met: it says to stay on the forwarded origin. Criterion 2 is missed: it never says session traffic is proxied through the forward. Criterion 3 is met: it says not to use the internal port. Criterion 4 is met: it invents no connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, avoids requiring the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. Criterion 2 is met only implicitly, as the forward is called the path set up to reach the internal port.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1 (stays on forwarded origin), 2 (forward is the path to reach the internal port), 3 (says not to use the internal port), and 4 (only predicts failure, claims no successful check).\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Met criteria 1, 3, and 4: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, avoids requiring the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. Criterion 2 is only implied via the forward/proxy routing discussion, never stated outright.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met by telling the operator to stay on the forwarded origin, 2 by describing the forward/proxy as the only path to the internal session service, 3 by advising against the internal port, and 4 by claiming no connectivity check.\"}"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "dashboard",
      "mode": "baseline",
      "draw_index": 2,
      "generation_hash": "771b6633b9011c28b190c7ef47610a29bfb55930553f5616b4cc1e3cc087692e",
      "answer_sha256": "771b6633b9011c28b190c7ef47610a29bfb55930553f5616b4cc1e3cc087692e",
      "status": "measured",
      "judge_outputs": [
        "{\"score\": 0.75, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Meets criteria 1, 3, and 4: it says to stay on the forwarded origin, never requires the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. Criterion 2 is only implicit, since it never explicitly says session traffic is proxied.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps interaction on the forwarded origin, explains the browser reaches the internal port only through the forward, does not require the internal port, and claims no connectivity check.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Criteria 1, 3, and 4 are clearly met: it keeps the operator on the forwarded origin, never requires the internal port, and claims no connectivity check. Criterion 2 is met only loosely, via 'Your browser only reaches it through the forward', without explicitly saying session traffic is proxied.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 0.5, \"pass\": false, \"reason\": \"Criterion 1 is met (stay on forwarded origin) and criterion 2 is partially met since it explains proxying/forward role, but criterion 3 is arguably met via 'don't follow internal port', while criterion 4 is met as no connectivity check is invented; however the response fails to clearly explain that session traffic is proxied through the forwarded origin and recommends rewriting links, so scoring conservatively at 0.5.\"}",
        "{\"score\": 1.0, \"pass\": true, \"reason\": \"Keeps interaction on the forwarded origin (criterion 1), explains the browser reaches the internal port only through the forward (criterion 2), never requires the internal port (criterion 3), and claims no connectivity check (criterion 4).\"}"
      ]
    }
  ]
}