{ "format": "driftproof-answers/2", "receipt_hash": "0aba83f8316912473981b79d945c81c443f47de415bdac61098b5dac642afdde", "model_id": "claude-sonnet-5-5", "answers": { "178ab5f3933a57bb2b1102b64a7ead99f1bd932fdc947d284476c38a8376d16c": "**Next workflow: none. Just make the edit directly.**\n\nRouting goes to the first matching row in the project-state table. A corrected title in an existing HyperFrames project is a \"specific edit to an existing project\", and that row comes before the `BRIEF.md` row. So the guidance is:\n\n- **Make the edit.** Change the title text in the composition. To find where the title lives without reading every file, `npx hyperframes timeline [--json]` shows what's on the timeline, but I'd only run that when I actually do the work, not now.\n- **No new discovery interview.** The intent layer is only for fresh creation. The approved `BRIEF.md` stays as the record and is not reopened or re-asked. Nothing in a title fix changes the workflow, so there's no routing question either.\n- **No workflow install or re-route.** There's no need to run `skills update` or re-select `/general-video`, `/product-launch-video`, or whatever the brief named. A title edit doesn't need the owning workflow's full pipeline.\n- **Domain skills only if needed.** `/hyperframes-core` covers the composition HTML if the edit touches timing attributes. If the title is animated, `/hyperframes-animation` or `/hyperframes-keyframes` may apply. A plain text fix usually needs neither.\n- **Project history.** The skill says to bracket edits to an existing project with project history (via `/hyperframes-cli`), so I'd do that around the change.\n- **CLI pin.** If the project's scripts pin a `hyperframes@`, I'd probe once with `npx hyperframes@latest upgrade --project . --check` before any render-affecting command, and report any version bump.\n\nIf you later ask for a render or want to preview the result, that's a separate operation, and I'd offer the Studio preview first only at a workflow's final look.", "608cae0c52887879a2830cb3faebb31e6becd796d6f99bfd31269ce6ae38d182": "**Next workflow:** Make the title edit directly. No workflow routing is needed.\n\n**Why:** In the state table, a specific edit to an existing HyperFrames project means you make the edit and skip the intent layer. The existing `BRIEF.md` is also not re-read for routing, because this is a targeted change, not a fresh creation or a resume.\n\n**Discovery interview:** Not needed. The interview exists only for fresh creation, and its sole output is `BRIEF.md`, which already exists and is approved. Re-running it would re-open a decision that's already made.\n\n**How I'd do it, when you want me to proceed:**\n1. To locate the title, I'd run `npx hyperframes timeline [--json]` rather than reading `index.html` and every sub-composition file.\n2. I'd correct the title text in the file that holds it, touching nothing else, and load `/hyperframes-core` first if the edit involves composition HTML.\n3. Because this edits an existing project, I'd bracket the edit with project history as the skill describes (via `/hyperframes-cli`).\n4. If the scripts pin an older `hyperframes@`, I'd run the read-only `npx hyperframes@latest upgrade --project . --check` before any render-affecting command.\n\nIf you also want a render or preview afterward, that's a separate operation I'd do on request.", "ded5656404906ccf79044a2bc76dd5cee602bbd5b83daf5c11d68e59bbca31e0": "**Next workflow: make the edit directly, no workflow routing.**\n\nThis is a specific edit to an existing HyperFrames project (changing a title), so the \"Specific edit to an existing project\" row of the project-state table applies. Two things follow from that:\n\n- **No new discovery interview.** The intent layer (`references/intent-interview.md`) runs only for fresh creation. Since an approved `BRIEF.md` already exists and this is just a corrected title, there are no brief questions to ask and no re-routing to do. The brief's recorded `workflow` and `flow` stay as they are.\n- **No workflow reinstall or re-selection.** Routing happens once, at brief time, so I wouldn't reopen the route table or run `skills update` just for a text fix.\n\n**How I'd proceed when allowed to use tools:**\n\n1. Locate the title with `npx hyperframes timeline [--json]` to see which clip or sub-composition holds it, rather than reading every file.\n2. Edit the title text in the owning composition HTML. If the title is also in `BRIEF.md` or `STORYBOARD.md`, correct it there too so the documents stay consistent.\n3. Load `/hyperframes-core` before touching the composition HTML, since it owns the authoring contract. Keep timing attributes (`data-start`, `data-duration`) untouched.\n4. Bracket the edit with project history per `/hyperframes-cli`, then verify with `npx hyperframes check` (and a snapshot if the title's layout could change, e.g. a longer string wrapping).\n5. If the project's scripts pin a `hyperframes` version, run the read-only `upgrade --project . --check` probe before any render-affecting command. Rendering is only needed if you ask for it.\n\nOne caveat: if the corrected title is noticeably longer or shorter, check for overflow or wrapping, since that is the one way a \"simple text fix\" can break the layout.", "7def87acb6df26b886df91e9df2ece98406eeec5409936d59d72ccbe2945b89d": "**Next workflow:** Make the title fix as a direct edit in the existing project. No workflow routing is needed, and you don't hand it to a workflow like `/general-video`.\n\n**Why no new discovery interview:**\n- A corrected title is a \"specific edit to an existing project\", so the entry-point rules say to make the edit and not run the intent layer.\n- An approved `BRIEF.md` already exists. When one is present, you read its `workflow` and `flow` fields and ask no brief questions. The brief stays as the routing record, and nothing re-opens the interview.\n\n**How I'd do it:**\n1. Run `npx hyperframes timeline --json` to find which clip or composition holds the title, rather than reading `index.html` and every sub-composition file.\n2. Change only the title text, and load `/hyperframes-core` first if the edit touches composition HTML.\n3. Bracket the edit with project history (`/hyperframes-cli`), since this is an edit to an existing project.\n4. If the project's `package.json` scripts pin a `hyperframes@`, run `npx hyperframes@latest upgrade --project . --check` once before the first render-affecting command. If it reports the pin as behind, upgrade, verify with `npx hyperframes check`, and name the old and new versions in the summary.\n5. Before any delivery render, open the Studio preview so you can look at the corrected title. If you then render, pass on the desktop-app line the render prints.\n\nI haven't run any of this, since you asked for a text-only answer.", "922bd024d22cccf3880d31b9dbe843f596b2c290c86efb87699e7a365f35f53a": "**Next workflow:** none to route. A corrected title is a specific edit to an existing HyperFrames project, so you make the edit directly and skip workflow selection.\n\n**Discovery interview:** not needed. The intent layer only runs for fresh creation. Because the approved `BRIEF.md` already exists, nothing gets re-asked or re-routed. The brief's `workflow` and `flow` fields remain the record of what the route required, and I wouldn't reopen them for a title fix.\n\n**How I'd proceed (when tools are allowed):**\n1. Find where the title lives. `npx hyperframes timeline [--json]` shows what is on the timeline without reading every composition file.\n2. Change only the title text. `/hyperframes-core` covers the composition HTML, and `/hyperframes-cli` covers any validation or preview.\n3. Bracket the edit with project history, as the entry skill says to do when editing an existing project.\n4. If the project's scripts pin a `hyperframes@`, run the read-only upgrade probe once before the first render-affecting command. If it reports the pin as behind, upgrade, verify with `npx hyperframes check`, and name the old and new versions in the summary.\n\nI haven't run any of this, since you asked for a text-only answer.", "f7d3ee81f616773b11de8f56453fdb9867d86d23461d3bf8a5f5d9d87c9aecc1": "**Next workflow: a direct edit, with no workflow routing.**\n\nA corrected title in an existing HyperFrames project is a specific edit to an existing project. In the project-state table, that row applies before the `BRIEF.md` row, so you don't hand off to a creation workflow such as `/general-video` or `/motion-graphics`. You just make the edit.\n\n**No new discovery interview is needed.** The intent interview only runs for fresh creation, and this is neither a fresh creation nor a new film. The approved `BRIEF.md` is already there and stays as the record of what was agreed. A typo fix doesn't change it, so no brief questions and no re-routing.\n\n**How the edit would go:**\n1. Find the title with `npx hyperframes timeline [--json]` rather than reading `index.html` and every sub-composition file.\n2. Change only the title text. Per the entry-point guidance, `/hyperframes-core` owns the composition authoring contract, so I'd read it before touching the HTML.\n3. Bracket the edit with project history (`/hyperframes-cli`) and re-validate with `npx hyperframes check`.\n4. Before the first render-affecting command, probe the pinned CLI with `npx hyperframes@latest upgrade --project . --check`. If it's behind, upgrade, verify, and name the old and new version in the summary.\n\nSince you asked for text only, I haven't run any of this. If you give me the old and corrected title, I can do it when you're ready for tools.", "25f766dbd6cbae1e059f5724e69312d768c8b59c85360aefa95bfec1857b93f7": "**Next workflow:** a direct edit. No workflow routing is needed.\n\n**Why:** The project state table applies the first matching row. A corrected title on an existing HyperFrames project is a \"specific edit to an existing project\", so the action is to make the edit. The presence of `BRIEF.md` matters less here, because the edit row comes earlier in the table than the `BRIEF.md` row, and the later row is never evaluated.\n\n**Is a new discovery interview needed?** No. The intent layer (`references/intent-interview.md`) only runs for fresh creation. A title fix isn't fresh creation, and the approved brief already exists, so I would ask no brief questions and leave the brief alone. I also wouldn't re-route through § 2's table or re-install a workflow.\n\n**What I'd do when you want me to proceed:**\n1. Run `npx hyperframes timeline [--json]` to locate the title clip, instead of reading `index.html` and every sub-composition.\n2. Bracket the edit with project history, as the entry point instructs for edits to existing projects.\n3. Change only the title text, loading `/hyperframes-core` first if I need to touch composition HTML.\n4. Check the result. Tell me if you also want a preview or render, since that would be a separate operation.\n\nOne more point: if the project's scripts pin an older `hyperframes@`, I'd probe with `npx hyperframes@latest upgrade --project . --check` before any render-affecting command, and say so in my summary if the pin changes.", "8be2af5e8360d24643be932ef38197ffe5206f30809e9200c0d3155669d57058": "**No new discovery interview is needed.** Discovery exists to establish scope, audience, tone, and content. Here the approved brief already settles all of that, and the only change is a corrected title, which doesn't alter any of those decisions.\n\n**Next workflow: a targeted edit of the existing project.**\n\n1. **Update the title where it appears.** That means the project's title field or metadata, any on-screen title text in the composition, and the brief itself if it records the title. Keeping the brief in sync means it doesn't contradict the project.\n2. **Leave everything else alone.** Don't regenerate the structure, script, or visuals, since the approved brief still governs them.\n3. **Check the result.** Preview or re-render only the parts that show the title, such as an opening card or lower third. Make sure a longer or shorter title doesn't break the layout, timing, or line wrapping.\n4. **Re-export or re-share** if a previous output already went out with the old title.\n\nI don't have the supplied facts naming HyperFrames' specific workflow commands, so I can't point to an exact one. If it has a \"revise\" or \"edit existing project\" path, that's the right one, not the new-project or discovery path.\n\nA fresh interview would only be warranted if the corrected title signals a change in angle, audience, or message, since that would mean the approved brief is no longer accurate.", "e9e7941e6ac144b2551ca87ec3626fc7efaffc1d0faff08f3a95a07c2cd2304e": "**No new discovery interview is needed.** Discovery exists to establish intent, audience, tone, and scope. Here the approved brief already settles those, and the change is a corrected title, not a change of direction. Re-interviewing would just reopen decisions that are already made.\n\n**Next workflow: a targeted edit of the existing project.**\n\n1. **Confirm the correction.** Get the exact corrected title text, including capitalization and punctuation, so there's no guessing.\n2. **Find every place the title appears.** That likely includes the main title element or composition, any metadata or project name field, and the brief itself if it quotes the old title.\n3. **Make the minimal change.** Edit only the title and leave layout, timing, styling, and other content alone.\n4. **Check the fit.** A corrected title may be longer or shorter than the old one, so look for wrapping, overflow, or timing issues in the title scene.\n5. **Re-preview or re-render** only as much as needed to verify the title displays correctly.\n6. **Record the change.** If the brief stores the title, update it so the brief and project stay consistent, and tell the user you did so.\n\n**When to reopen discovery:** only if the title correction implies a change in meaning, such as a different product name, audience, or message. Then other parts of the approved brief might also be affected.\n\nI haven't inspected the project, and I don't have HyperFrames' exact command or skill names in the facts supplied, so I've described the workflow in general terms. If you want, I can map these steps onto the project's actual files and commands once I'm allowed to look.", "1c4c6da8e4822817c5cc67f9776dd556c866a44bc97249873cb032c31ccba0cd": "**No new discovery interview is needed.** Discovery exists to establish scope, audience, message, and direction. Here the approved brief already settles all of that, and the only change is a corrected title, which doesn't alter any of those decisions.\n\n**Next workflow: a targeted edit of the existing project.**\n\n1. **Update the title where it appears.** Check the project's title field, any on-screen title text or title card, and the brief's own title line if it repeats it. That keeps everything consistent without reopening the brief's content.\n2. **Leave everything else alone.** Don't regenerate scenes, restructure the composition, or rewrite approved copy.\n3. **Re-render or preview only what the title touches**, then confirm the corrected title displays properly. Check for text overflow or line-wrapping if the new title is longer.\n4. **Get a quick sign-off on the title change alone**, not a re-approval of the whole brief.\n\n**When to reopen discovery:** only if the corrected title implies a change in framing, audience, or message. In that case it's no longer just a title fix, and a short, scoped check-in on that change would be warranted, not a full interview.\n\nI haven't looked at the project, so I'm not naming specific HyperFrames commands or file paths. If you want, I can find the exact places the title is defined once tools are allowed.", "69b85dc074c3297d883fee4f8797c7af6ad28439ca4ca38cf46b15e42b0bdd73": "I haven't run anything, per your instructions. Here is where things stand and what I'd do next.\n\n**Usage check**\nAt the start of creation I would run `npx hyperframes usage --json`. For this session, that check returns `status: unknown`, so I can't tell how much allowance is left or when it resets. I won't guess. I'll check again at milestones, after the draft and before any render. The scope and workflow choices stay with you.\n\n**What I need first**\nI don't yet know what the explainer is about, and that decides the workflow. Could you tell me:\n1. **Subject and source:** a topic, article, notes, a website URL, or a GitHub PR?\n2. **Length and narration:** roughly how long, and with voiceover or without? Under ~10s with no narration would be a motion graphic. A narrated explainer with invented visuals would be a faceless explainer.\n3. **Look and audience:** any brand, palette, or tone to match, and who it's for.\n\n**Next steps once you answer**\n1. Check for saved preferences or recipes, then run a short intent conversation and write `BRIEF.md`.\n2. Pick the matching workflow, install it with `npx hyperframes skills update `, and load the domain skills it needs.\n3. Draft the concept and a storyboard (or a script, if narrated) for your review.\n4. Re-check usage after the draft.\n5. **Render only when you approve.** Before the final render I'd open the Studio preview so you can inspect and edit the video there.\n\nNothing will be rendered until you say so. What's the video about?", "9f01177af8be0fa65c5d7fd0affa44904a445f89fe7176b89fe7e88ef7e01500": "Here's the draft reply and the plan.\n\n---\n\n**Draft response to the user**\n\nI'm ready to start on your explainer. Two things first:\n\n**Usage:** I ran the usage check at the start of creation and it returned `status: unknown`. I can't tell how much allowance you have left or when it resets, so I won't guess. I'll check again after drafting and before any render.\n\n**Rendering:** Nothing will be rendered until you approve it. I'll stop at a preview first so you can review the draft.\n\n**What I need from you:** What is the explainer about? Please give me one of these:\n- a topic, brief, or notes\n- an article or URL\n- a GitHub PR\n- a product or website\n\nAlso useful, but optional:\n- target length (a few seconds up to about 3 minutes)\n- audience and tone\n- whether you want narration, music, or captions\n- any brand colors, fonts, or reference footage\n\n---\n\n**Next steps once you answer**\n\n1. **Check for saved preferences and recipes.** I'll do this before asking anything more, so I don't repeat questions you've already answered.\n2. **Route the request** based on your subject:\n - a topic or notes with invented visuals goes to the faceless explainer workflow\n - a PR goes to the PR-to-video workflow\n - a website or product goes to the product launch workflow\n - an unnarrated clip under about 10 seconds goes to motion graphics\n - anything else goes to the general video workflow\n3. **Run the short intent interview** and write `BRIEF.md`. Every later step reads that file, so I won't re-ask you.\n4. **Install the chosen workflow** with `npx hyperframes skills update `, then load the composition, animation, and creative skills it needs.\n5. **Draft the video** (storyboard, design, composition), then re-check usage.\n6. **Open the Studio preview** for your review. You can edit directly there.\n7. **Render only after you approve.** I'll check usage once more first.\n\nOnce you tell me the subject, I'll move to step 1.", "899c4fca50461fa4f9c45827eea8e05138ddcecf8048f81e5f8eca34693b203d": "**Usage:** The creation-start usage check (`npx hyperframes usage --json`) returned `status: unknown`, so I can't tell you how much allowance remains or when it resets. I won't guess. I'll check again after drafting and before any render, and if it's still unknown I'll say so then.\n\n**Where we are:** This is a fresh creation in a clean repo with no `BRIEF.md`, `STORYBOARD.md` or `hyperframes.json`. I haven't started anything, and nothing will be rendered without your approval.\n\n**One thing I need first:** What is the explainer about? I can't pick a workflow without a subject or input. A topic, article, notes, a URL, a GitHub PR or existing footage would all do.\n\n**Likely route once I know:**\n- A topic, article or notes with invented visuals goes to `/faceless-explainer`, which is my default guess for \"short explainer\" and is strongest at about 30-90s.\n- A GitHub PR or code change goes to `/pr-to-video`.\n- A product or website goes to `/product-launch-video`.\n- An unnarrated clip under about 10s goes to `/motion-graphics`.\n\n**Next steps:**\n1. You tell me the subject, plus a target length, tone and audience if you have them.\n2. I run the short intent interview, checking saved preferences and recipes first, and write `BRIEF.md`.\n3. I install the chosen workflow with `npx hyperframes skills update ` and draft the script and storyboard for your review.\n4. I recheck usage after the draft.\n5. I open the Studio preview so you can review and edit. I'll mention the desktop app's \"Edit with Framey\" option only if the CLI shows it.\n6. You approve, and only then do I run the delivery render.", "01d54134b21ec59b4d54f657806a40f07e5f87fb516db8f663c0b9a174d7c11d": "**Usage:** The usage check at creation start returned `status: unknown`, so I can't tell you how much allowance is left, and I won't guess. I'll check again after drafting and before any render.\n\n**Rendering:** Nothing will be rendered until you approve it. I'll stop at a previewable draft and ask first.\n\n**What I need from you:** What is the explainer about? A topic, article, notes, URL, or GitHub PR all work. I can't pick a workflow without a subject.\n\n**Next steps once you answer:**\n1. **Check saved preferences and recipes**, so I don't ask what's already recorded.\n2. **Run a short intent conversation** covering length, tone, narration or no narration, and any must-haves. It ends with a `BRIEF.md`, which is the only thing the workflow reads from then on.\n3. **Route by what you give me:**\n - A topic or notes with invented visuals goes to the faceless explainer workflow.\n - A GitHub PR goes to the PR-to-video workflow.\n - A website or product goes to the product launch workflow.\n - A very short unnarrated piece (under about 10s) goes to the motion graphics workflow.\n - Anything else goes to the general video workflow.\n4. **Install the chosen workflow** with `npx hyperframes skills update `.\n5. **Draft the composition** and check the usage allowance again.\n6. **Open the Studio preview** so you can review and edit it.\n7. **Wait for your explicit go-ahead** before the delivery render.\n\nTwo quick questions that would speed this up: roughly how long should it be (for example 30–60s), and should it have voiceover?", "ba6146dc6c3e700be9e2d55dc8606c8a3f5db74b098ded4509ce61dd23941527": "**Usage:** The creation-start usage check returned `status: unknown`, so I can't tell you how much allowance is left. I won't guess. I'll check again after drafting and before any render.\n\n**Rendering:** Nothing will be rendered without your approval. The plan is to draft, show you a preview, and then ask before the delivery render.\n\nI can't pick a workflow yet because I don't know what the explainer is about. Could you tell me:\n\n1. **Subject:** What should the video explain? A topic, article, notes, a GitHub PR, or a product or site (with a URL)?\n2. **Length and voice:** Roughly how long, and should it have narration or be unnarrated motion? Under about 10 seconds with no narration is a motion graphic. Anything longer with narration is an explainer.\n3. **Look and feel:** Any brand colors, tone, or reference videos? Skip this if you'd rather I propose options.\n\n**Next steps once you answer:**\n- **Routing:**\n - A topic, article, or notes with invented visuals goes to the faceless explainer workflow.\n - A PR goes to the PR-to-video workflow.\n - A site or product goes to the product launch workflow.\n - A very short unnarrated piece goes to motion graphics.\n- **Brief and draft:** I'll check any saved preferences, write `BRIEF.md`, install the chosen workflow, and draft the video.\n- **Review:** I'll open the Studio preview so you can review and edit it. I'll re-check usage then.\n- **Render:** I'll render only after you approve.", "37bb000b861d4002331ededc7609af98aac792787a8d8d3c3c81c96f0bf35144": "## Draft explainer\n\n**Where things stand**\n- The usage check returned **status: unknown** when creation started. That means I can't say whether usage is within limits, so I'm not assuming it is.\n- You haven't approved **rendering**, so I'm not producing or triggering any rendered output. This reply is plain text only.\n- No tools, network access, file writes, commands, or installs were used.\n\n**What this means**\nThis is a text-only draft. Because the usage status is unconfirmed and rendering isn't approved, anything that consumes resources or publishes output is on hold.\n\n**Gap in the supplied facts**\nYou asked for a short explainer, but the facts don't say what it should explain. I've covered only the current state above and haven't invented a subject.\n\n## Next steps\n\n1. **Tell me the explainer's topic and audience** (for example, teammates or end users), and I'll rewrite the draft around it.\n2. **Re-run the usage check** when tools are allowed again. The status needs to move from unknown to a known value before any step that consumes resources.\n3. **Decide on rendering.** If you want a rendered version, give explicit approval. Until then I'll stay in text.\n4. **Review the draft.** Once the topic is set, I'll tighten it to the length you want.\n\nWhich topic should I write the explainer on?", "c92b77fd3dfdf0e264c114d3f1ddda96adb11feb442ba6409a3fd908fe55be8c": "I can't write the explainer's content yet, because the topic wasn't specified. Here is what the supplied facts do tell us, followed by a draft and next steps.\n\n## What we know\n- **Usage check:** it returned `unknown` at creation start. I can't say whether usage or quota is fine, so I'm not assuming it is.\n- **Rendering:** not approved, so nothing gets rendered, exported, or published. This draft is text only.\n- **Repo state:** a git repo on a detached `HEAD`, with a clean working tree and no recent commits. Nothing is in progress that the explainer would need to reflect.\n- **Constraints for this turn:** no tools, network, file writes, commands, or installs.\n\n## Draft explainer (placeholder, pending topic)\n\n> **[Topic] in brief**\n> [One-sentence definition of what it is and why it matters.]\n> - **How it works:** [two or three sentences on the core mechanism.]\n> - **When to use it:** [one concrete scenario.]\n> - **What to watch for:** [one main caveat or limitation.]\n>\n> *Status note: the usage check was inconclusive at start, so figures or availability claims here are unverified.*\n\n## Next steps\n1. **You:** tell me the topic and audience, and I'll fill in the draft at the same length.\n2. **You:** decide whether I may render the explainer. I'll treat it as not approved until you say so.\n3. **Usage check:** rerun it, or tell me how to interpret `unknown`, before anything depends on it. Once tools are allowed, I can rerun it myself.\n4. **Repo:** if the explainer should be saved, say where. The detached `HEAD` means I'd suggest creating a branch first so the work isn't orphaned. I won't write or commit anything without your go-ahead.", "9d6de8bc2b7c12bf06cfcb3f250b845d7f9eb30345da3cc309607ec82b47388d": "## Draft response\n\n**Short explainer**\n\nWhen the item is created, the usage check returns `unknown`. That means no usage information was available at that moment, which is different from \"no usage\" or \"in use\". Nothing should be inferred from it, and it shouldn't be treated as a pass or a fail. The status should be re-checked once the check can actually resolve.\n\nRendering has not been approved, so nothing has been produced or displayed beyond this text.\n\n**Caveat**\n\nYou didn't say what the explainer should cover. I've assumed it's about the `unknown` usage status at creation. If you meant a different subject, tell me and I'll rewrite it.\n\n## Next steps\n\n1. **Confirm the topic.** Check that the explainer should be about the `unknown` creation-time status.\n2. **Approve or decline rendering.** I won't render anything until you say so. Tell me the format you want (for example, markdown, HTML, or an image) when you approve.\n3. **Re-run the usage check.** This needs tools, so it's outside this text-only exchange. Once you allow it, I can run it and report the real status.\n4. **Decide how to treat `unknown`.** Choose whether it should block creation, show a warning, or be allowed with a follow-up check. I'd recommend allowing it with a follow-up check, since `unknown` means \"not yet determined\" and blocking on it would stall creation unnecessarily.", "74ab2c5a15df058b68b994804b817959d288803635c0a0fcd30c7faefc9ebf57": "**Route: `/remotion-to-hyperframes`, not the generic creation wizard.**\n\nThis is the first row of the project-state table: an explicit port of existing Remotion source to HyperFrames. It's also priority 1 in the fresh-creation routing table. Either way the destination is the same workflow.\n\n**What that means in practice**\n\n- **Skip the intent layer.** No `references/intent-interview.md` conversation, no pitch round, no `BRIEF.md` interview. A port has a defined input (the Remotion source) and output (an equivalent HyperFrames composition), so the creation wizard would only ask questions the source already answers.\n- **Read `references/routes/remotion-to-hyperframes.md` first.** It holds the canonical input/output/trigger contract for this route. I'd confirm the request satisfies it before committing, and fall through to normal routing only if it doesn't.\n- **Install the workflow before using it.** `npx hyperframes skills update remotion-to-hyperframes` (bare name, no slash). If that fails, I surface the error rather than reconstructing the workflow from memory.\n- **Load domain skills as the port needs them.** Almost certainly `/hyperframes-core` (timing attributes, tracks, determinism, which must be read before writing composition HTML), plus `/hyperframes-animation` or `/hyperframes-keyframes` for translating Remotion's frame-driven animation into seekable runtimes, and `/hyperframes-cli` for lint, check, preview, and render.\n\n**Context I need from you**\n\n1. **Where the Remotion source lives**: the project path or the specific composition(s) to port. This is the one thing the route can't infer.\n2. **Scope**: one composition or the whole project, if there are several.\n3. **Any assets or dependencies** the source references (media, fonts, data files) that live outside the repo.\n\nNothing else is needed up front. Per the workflow, I'd also check remaining usage with `npx hyperframes usage --json` at the start and before rendering, and open the Studio preview before the delivery render so you can review the port.\n\nI haven't run anything yet. Send the source location and I'll start with the route file.", "6ad2912acb276e512b7ab37e4b136f3018ffa5d4018a55dc02b275220d4852a0": "**Route: the Remotion port workflow (`/remotion-to-hyperframes`), not the generic creation wizard.**\n\n**Why:** The entry-point skill's project-state table is applied top-down, first match wins. An explicit port of existing Remotion source is the first row, so it takes precedence over \"Fresh creation\" (the intent interview). The routing table in § 2 agrees: priority 1 is \"Explicitly port an existing Remotion source\" and maps to `/remotion-to-hyperframes`.\n\n**What that means in practice:**\n\n- **Skip the intent layer.** No intent interview, no pitch round, no `BRIEF.md` authoring. The direct route replaces the wizard.\n- **Read the route contract first:** `references/routes/remotion-to-hyperframes.md`. It holds the canonical input/output/trigger contract for this workflow and confirms the request actually satisfies it.\n- **Install the workflow** before reading it, with `npx hyperframes skills update remotion-to-hyperframes` (bare name, no slash). If that fails, surface the error rather than reconstructing the workflow from memory.\n- **Load domain skills only as needed.** Composition HTML must follow `/hyperframes-core`. Depending on what the Remotion source uses, likely candidates are `/hyperframes-animation` or `/hyperframes-keyframes` for motion, `/media-use` for assets, and `/hyperframes-cli` for check, preview, and render.\n\n**Context I need from you:**\n\n1. **The location of the Remotion source**: the project or composition files to port. This is what makes the request an explicit port, and it is the one input the workflow needs to begin.\n2. **Which composition(s)** to port, if the project contains several.\n3. **Any assets or dependencies** the source references (media, fonts, data) if they live outside the project.\n\nBeyond that, I'd also run `npx hyperframes usage --json` at the start and again before rendering, and at the final look I'd open the Studio preview before any delivery render. I haven't done any of that here, since you asked for text only.", "0dd86bec80c6539f483f18aaef779eef7c1e97362d13f208545632547177b57f": "**Route: the Remotion port workflow (`/remotion-to-hyperframes`), not the generic creation wizard.**\n\n**Why this route**\n\n- The entry-point skill's project-state table has a first row that matches an explicit port of existing Remotion source to HyperFrames. First matching row wins, so lower rows (including \"Fresh creation\") are never evaluated.\n- That row says to read `references/routes/remotion-to-hyperframes.md` and route directly to the workflow, skipping the intent layer. The intent interview, pitch round, and `BRIEF.md` authoring belong to fresh creation, so I would not run them.\n- The same priority applies in the fresh-creation routing table, where an explicit Remotion port is row 1, so the result is the same either way.\n\n**What I would do next (once tools are allowed)**\n\n1. Read `references/routes/remotion-to-hyperframes.md` for the input/output/trigger contract and confirm your request satisfies it.\n2. Install or refresh the workflow with `npx hyperframes skills update remotion-to-hyperframes`. If that fails, I'd surface the error rather than reconstruct the workflow from memory.\n3. Load domain skills only as the workflow needs them. Likely candidates are `/hyperframes-core` for the composition HTML contract (`data-*` timing, seekable runtime, media ownership), `/hyperframes-animation` and `/hyperframes-keyframes` for translating Remotion's frame-driven animation into seek-safe motion, and `/hyperframes-cli` for check, preview, and render.\n4. When the work reaches a final look, open the Studio preview before any delivery render.\n\n**Context I need from you**\n\n- **The Remotion source:** the path to the project or composition (entry file, `Root.tsx`/`Composition` definitions, and any components it imports).\n- **Which composition(s) to port**, if the project has several.\n- **Assets and inputs:** media files, fonts, and any props or data the composition takes. I'd also want to know if there are `staticFile`/`@remotion/*` dependencies in use.\n- **Output expectations:** target resolution, fps, and duration, and whether you want a visually matching result or are fine with idiomatic HyperFrames equivalents where Remotion features (e.g. React state or hooks) don't map directly.\n\nNo `BRIEF.md` is needed for this route. The repo is clean with no existing HyperFrames project, so this starts as a new port.", "c97cfa6d29ad41bae937175bec3844c1157d8eaf7c677160509d7b588d5119b7": "**Route: the port path, not the generic creation wizard.**\n\nYou're converting an existing Remotion composition, so the job is translation, not authoring from scratch. The creation wizard would ask you to re-specify things that already exist in your Remotion code (scenes, timing, assets, styling), and it would likely produce something that drifts from the original. Porting keeps the source composition as the ground truth.\n\n**Context needed to do the port well:**\n\n1. **The Remotion source.** The composition entry point (`Root.tsx` with the `` registration) and every component it renders. Without these I can't map the structure.\n2. **Composition parameters.** Width, height, fps, `durationInFrames`, and any `defaultProps` or input props/schema.\n3. **Timing logic.** Use of ``, ``, `useCurrentFrame`, `interpolate`, `spring`, and `Easing`. These are the parts that most need careful mapping to HyperFrames' timeline model, so I need to know whether frame-based values should be preserved exactly.\n4. **Assets.** Images, video, audio, fonts, and how they're referenced (`staticFile`, imports, remote URLs). Audio and video sync (`